Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Research Articles, Behavioral/Cognitive

Common neural mechanisms control attention and working memory

Ying Zhou, Clayton E. Curtis, Kartik Sreenivasan and Daryl Fougnie
Journal of Neuroscience 4 August 2022, JN-RM-0443-22; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0443-22.2022
Ying Zhou
1Program in Psychology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
2Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clayton E. Curtis
2Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003
3Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kartik Sreenivasan
1Program in Psychology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
2Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003
4Program in Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daryl Fougnie
1Program in Psychology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
2Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Although previous studies point to qualitative similarities between working memory (WM) and attention, the degree to which these two constructs rely on shared neural mechanisms remains unknown. Focusing on one such potentially shared mechanism, we tested the hypothesis that selecting an item within WM utilizes similar neural mechanisms as selecting a visible item via a shift of attention. We used fMRI and machine learning to decode both the selection among items visually available and the selection among items stored in WM in human subjects (both sexes). Patterns of activity in visual, parietal, and to a lesser extent frontal cortex predicted the locations of the selected items. Critically, these patterns were strikingly interchangeable; classifiers trained on data during attentional selection predicted selection from WM, and classifiers trained on data during selection from memory predicted attentional selection. Using models of voxel receptive fields, we visualized topographic population activity that revealed gain enhancements at the locations of the externally and internally selected items. Our results suggest that selecting among perceived items and selecting among items in WM share a common mechanism. This common mechanism, analogous to a shift of spatial attention, controls the relative gains of neural populations that encode behaviorally relevant information.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

How we allocate our attention to external stimuli that we see and to internal representations of stimuli stored in memory might rely on a common mechanism. Supporting this hypothesis, we demonstrated that not only could patterns of human brain activity predict which items were selected during perception and memory, but that these patterns were interchangeable during external and internal selection. Additionally, this generalized selection mechanism operates by changes in the gains of the neural populations both encoding attended sensory representations and storing relevant memory representations.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • We thank New York University’s Center for Brain Imaging for technical support. This research was supported by the United States National Eye Institute (NEI) (R01 EY-016407 to C.E.C. and R01 EY-027925 to C.E.C.), the Abu Dhabi Department of Education and Knowledge (ADEK) Abu Dhabi Award for Research Excellence (AARE) (AARE19-230) to K.K.S, and the Research Enhancement Fund (RE177) from New York University Abu Dhabi to D.F.

SfN exclusive license.

Back to top
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Common neural mechanisms control attention and working memory
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Common neural mechanisms control attention and working memory
Ying Zhou, Clayton E. Curtis, Kartik Sreenivasan, Daryl Fougnie
Journal of Neuroscience 4 August 2022, JN-RM-0443-22; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0443-22.2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Common neural mechanisms control attention and working memory
Ying Zhou, Clayton E. Curtis, Kartik Sreenivasan, Daryl Fougnie
Journal of Neuroscience 4 August 2022, JN-RM-0443-22; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0443-22.2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Articles

  • Irrelevant Threats Linger and Affect Behavior in High Anxiety
  • Spatiotemporal Developmental Gradient of Thalamic Morphology, Microstructure, and Connectivity fromthe Third Trimester to Early Infancy
  • Expression of a Form of Cerebellar Motor Memory Requires Learned Alterations to the Activity of Inhibitory Molecular Layer Interneurons
Show more Research Articles

Behavioral/Cognitive

  • Disentangling Object Category Representations Driven by Dynamic and Static Visual Input
  • Irrelevant Threats Linger and Affect Behavior in High Anxiety
  • Multisession Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Context Discrimination in Mice
Show more Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.