Abstract
The human brain has inherent limitations in consciously processing visual information. When individuals monitor a rapid sequence of images for detecting two targets, they often miss the second target (T2) if it appears within a short time frame of 200-500ms after the first target (T1), a phenomenon known as the attentional blink (AB). The neural mechanism behind the attentional blink (AB) remains unclear, largely due to the use of simplistic visual items such as letters and digits in conventional AB experiments, which differ significantly from naturalistic vision. This study employs advanced multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) of human EEG data (including 17 females and 18 males) to explore the neural representations associated with target processing within a naturalistic paradigm under conditions where AB does or does not occur. Our MVPA analysis successfully decoded the identity of target images from EEG data. Moreover, in the AB condition, characterized by a limited time between targets, Tl processing coincided with T2 processing, resulting in the suppression of late representational markers of both Tl and T2. Conversely, in the condition with longer inter-target interval, neural representations endured for a longer duration. These findings suggest that the attentional blink can be attributed to the suppression of neural representations in the later stages of target processing.
Significance Statement Within a naturalistic paradigm, we investigated the phenomenon known as attentional blink, where individuals struggle to identify a second target in a rapid sequence when the first target precedes it too closely. Attentional blink is purported to reflect an apparent bottleneck in the attention system’s ability to rapidly redirect attentional resources; however, the mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains hotly debated. Our findings reveal that during a rapid presentation of natural images, a short temporal gap between targets results in reduced neural representations of targets and the occurrence of attentional blink. Conversely, when a greater temporal gap exists between targets, neural representations are preserved. This study provides valuable insights into how the human brain perceives the ever-changing visual world around us.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This study was supported by the Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF) through a BrainsCAN grant to Y.M., a Vector Institute Research Grant to Y.M., and anNSERC Dicovery Grant to Y.M. Also, M.J. received a graduate student scholarship from CFREF BrainsCAN. The authors would like to thank Diana Dima and Mehrdad Kashefi for helpful comments on the manuscript and Ali Tafakkor and Saba Charmi Motlagh for helpful discussions.