RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses
JF The Journal of Neuroscience
JO J. Neurosci.
FD Society for Neuroscience
SP 1708
OP 1718
DO 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-04-01708.1993
VO 13
IS 4
A1 SP Perrett
A1 BP Ruiz
A1 MD Mauk
YR 1993
UL http://www.jneurosci.org/content/13/4/1708.abstract
AB Among the many issues surrounding the involvement of the cerebellum in motor learning, the relative roles of the cerebellar cortex and cerebellar nuclei in Pavlovian conditioning have been particularly difficult to assess. While previous studies have investigated the effects of cerebellar cortex lesions on the acquisition and retention of conditioned movements, we have examined the effects of these lesions on the timing of Pavlovian eyelid responses. The rationale for this approach arises from previous studies indicating that this timing is a component of Pavlovian eyelid responses that is learned and that involves temporal discrimination. To permit within-animal comparisons, rabbits were trained to produce differently timed responses to high- and low-frequency auditory conditioned stimuli (CSs). Before the lesion the conditioned responses to both CSs were appropriately timed--each peaked near the time at which the unconditioned stimulus was presented for that CS. However, after the lesion both CSs could elicit similarly timed conditioned responses that peaked inappropriately at very short latencies. The changes in responses timing were sensitive to the size of the lesion, particularly its rostral-caudal extent. Similar results were obtained in animals trained with one CS, indicating that the disruption of response timing is not related to impaired auditory discrimination. Because response timing is learned and therefore requires synaptic plasticity, these data suggest that there are at least two sites of plasticity involved in the motor expression of Pavlovian eyelid responses. Plasticity at one site is necessary for the learned timing of conditioned responses, while plasticity at another site is revealed by the inappropriately timed responses observed following removal of the cerebellar cortex. This lesion-induced dissociation of the expression of motor responses and their learned timing supports a synthesis of competing views by suggesting that motor learning involves both the cerebellar cortex and cerebellar nuclei. We hypothesize that motor learning involves a decrease in strength of the granule cell-Purkinje cell synapses (e.g., Ito and Kano, 1982) in the cerebellar cortex and an increase in strength of the mossy fiber- cerebellar nuclei synapses (e.g., Racine et al., 1986). Finally, these data suggest that the cerebellar cortex may mediate the temporal discriminations that are necessary for the learned timing of conditioned responses.