PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Deborah Talmi AU - Ryan Atkinson AU - Wael El-Deredy TI - The Feedback-Related Negativity Signals Salience Prediction Errors, Not Reward Prediction Errors AID - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5695-12.2013 DP - 2013 May 08 TA - The Journal of Neuroscience PG - 8264--8269 VI - 33 IP - 19 4099 - http://www.jneurosci.org/content/33/19/8264.short 4100 - http://www.jneurosci.org/content/33/19/8264.full SO - J. Neurosci.2013 May 08; 33 AB - Modulations of the feedback-related negativity (FRN) event-related potential (ERP) have been suggested as a potential biomarker in psychopathology. A dominant theory about this signal contends that it reflects the operation of the neural system underlying reinforcement learning in humans. The theory suggests that this frontocentral negative deflection in the ERP 230–270 ms after the delivery of a probabilistic reward expresses a prediction error signal derived from midbrain dopaminergic projections to the anterior cingulate cortex. We tested this theory by investigating whether FRN will also be observed for an inherently aversive outcome: physical pain. In another session, the outcome was monetary reward instead of pain. As predicted, unexpected reward omissions (a negative reward prediction error) yielded a more negative deflection relative to unexpected reward delivery. Surprisingly, unexpected pain omission (a positive reward prediction error) also yielded a negative deflection relative to unexpected pain delivery. Our data challenge the theory by showing that the FRN expresses aversive prediction errors with the same sign as reward prediction errors. Both FRNs were spatiotemporally and functionally equivalent. We suggest that FRN expresses salience prediction errors rather than reward prediction errors.