PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Jie Liu
AU  - Ruolei Gu
AU  - Chong Liao
AU  - Juanzhi Lu
AU  - Yuxing Fang
AU  - Pengfei Xu
AU  - Yue-jia Luo
AU  - Fang Cui
TI  - The Neural Mechanism of the Social Framing Effect: Evidence from fMRI and tDCS Studies
AID  - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1385-19.2020
DP  - 2020 Apr 29
TA  - The Journal of Neuroscience
PG  - 3646--3656
VI  - 40
IP  - 18
4099  - http://www.jneurosci.org/content/40/18/3646.short
4100  - http://www.jneurosci.org/content/40/18/3646.full
SO  - J. Neurosci.2020 Apr 29; 40
AB  - As an important cognitive bias, the framing effect shows that our decision preferences are sensitive to the verbal description (i.e., frame) of options. This study focuses on the neural underpinnings of the social framing effect, which is based on decision-making regarding other people. A novel paradigm was used in which participants made a trade-off between economic benefits and the feelings of others. This decision was described as either a “harm” to, or “not helping,” other persons in two conditions (Harm frame vs Help frame). Both human males and females were recruited. Participants behaved more prosocially for Harm frame compared with Help frame, resulting in a significant social framing effect. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, Experiment 1 showed that the social framing effect was associated with stronger activation in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), especially its right part. The functional connectivity between the right TPJ (rTPJ) and medial prefrontal cortex predicted the social framing effect on the group level. In Experiment 2, we used transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate the activity of the rTPJ and found that the social framing effect became more prominent under anodal (excitatory) stimulation, while the nonsocial framing effect elicited by the economic gain/loss gambling frame remained unaffected. The rTPJ results might be associated with moral conflicts modulated by the social consequences of an action or different levels of mentalizing with others under different frame conditions, but alternative interpretations are also worth noting. These findings could help elucidate the psychological mechanisms of the social framing effect.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Previous studies have suggested that the framing effect is generated from an interaction between the amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex. This opinion, however, is based on findings from nonsocial framing tasks. Recent research has highlighted the importance of distinguishing between the social and nonsocial framing effects. The current study focuses on the social framing effect and finds out that the temporoparietal junction and its functional connectivity with the medial prefrontal cortex play a significant role. Additionally, modulating the activity of this region leads to changes in social (but not nonsocial) framing effect. Broadly speaking, these findings help understand the difference in neural mechanisms between social and nonsocial decision-making. Meanwhile, they might be illuminating to promote helping behavior in society.