Summary of the effect of a second conditioning high-frequency stimulus (HFS) on EPSP amplitudes
| Bath solution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIC/STRY | d-APV | |||
| Conditioning stimulation | 1. LFS | 2. HFS | 1. LFS | 2. HFS |
| EPSP amplitude (% control) | 47 ± 10* | 103 ± 12 | 86 ± 13 | 97 ± 16 |
| Number of neurons tested | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
Slices were superfused with a solution that contained either bicuculline (5 μm) and strychnine (2 μm) (BIC/STRY) or d-APV (50 μm). Responses recorded 30 min after the first conditioning low-frequency stimulus (1. LFS) and 15 min after the second conditioning stimulus (2. HFS) are expressed as percent of control responses.
↵* Significantly different from control (p ≤ 0.05).