Table 1.

Statistical analysis of synaptic maturation of HVc and lMAN inputs to RA

ParameterMean ± SDOne-way ANOVA Newman–Keuls tests (pvalues)
Nest.FledgeJuv.AdultN vs FN vs JN vs AF vs JF vs AJ vs A
A. HVc–RA EPSCsn = 21-an = 71-an = 81-an = 61-a
 NMDA:AMPA0.731-b2.2  ± 1.11-c2.3  ± 1.11-d0.87  ± 0.271-eF(2,15)= 3.75; p < 0.05NSNSNS
 Late:Early2.2  ± 1.11-f1.6  ± .641-g0.90  ± 0.611-hF(2,32) = 6.61; p < 0.005NS<0.01<0.05
 e-fold decay (msec)270  ± 1666  ± 3059  ± 1764  ± 24F(3,19)= 50.69; p < 0.0001<0.001<0.001<0.001NSNSNS
 Decay τf (msec)120  ± 10029  ± 3231  ± 2120  ± 7.8F(3,19)= 5.30; p < 0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01NSNSNS
 Decay τs (msec)360  ± 47110  ± 49110  ± 59100  ± 56F(3,19) = 13.00; p < 0.0001<0.001<0.001<0.001NSNSNS
 % slow49  ± 2769  ± 2060  ± 2468  ± 11F(3,19) = 0.68; NS
 Rise time (msec)13  ± 1.17.0  ± 2.97.8  ± 2.55.7  ± 1.5F(3,19) = 4.97; p < 0.02<0.05<0.05<0.01NSNSNS
B. lMAN–RA EPSCs n = 10n = 9n = 12n = 4
 e-fold decay (msec)220  ± 6394  ± 3172  ± 2077  ± 23F(3,31) = 30.04;p < 0.0001<0.001<0.001<0.001NSNSNS
 Decay τf (msec)52  ± 2335  ± 1526  ± 1730  ± 8.6F(3,31) = 4.20; p < 0.02NS<0.01NSNSNSNS
 Decay τs (msec)300  ± 76180  ± 47120  ± 47140  ± 55F(3,31) = 19.00; p < 0.0001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.05NSNS
 % slow74  ± 9.054  ± 2270  ± 1359  ± 4.9F(3,31) = 3.70; p < 0.03<0.05NSNSNSNSNS
 Rise time (msec)8.5  ± 2.96.1  ± 2.56.5  ± 1.95.6  ± 0.6F(3,31) = 2.52; NS
  • F1-a Except where noted.

  • F1-b n = 1.

  • F1-c n = 6.

  • F1-d n = 7.

  • F1-e n = 5.

  • F1-f n = 8.

  • F1-g n = 17.

  • F1-h n = 10.

  • N, nestling; F, fledgling; J, juvenile; A, adult; NS, not significant.