Table 1.

Effect of synthetic cannabinoids, endocannabinoids, and analogs on forskolin-stimulated accumulation of cAMP in BV-2 cells

Agents Concentration cAMP accumulation (% of forskolin response)
WIN55212-2 m 53 ± 8**
WIN55212-3 m 111 ± 13
AEA 100 nM 100 ± 7
2-AG 100 nM 58 ± 8**
PEA (16:0) 300 nM 60 ± 5**
Palmitic acid 300 nM 103 ± 13
Acyl-EA (14:0) 300 nM 97 ± 11
Acyl-EA (15:0) 300 nM 93 ± 8
Acyl-EA (16:1) 300 nM 104 ± 10
Acyl-EA (17:0) 300 nM 81 ± 10
Acyl-EA (18:0) 300 nM 96 ± 17
Iso-PEA 300 nM 122 ± 17
1-Meth-PEA 300 nM 116 ± 20
2-Meth-PEA 300 nM 118 ± 21
abn-CBD m 128 ± 11
Capsaicin m 91 ± 5
  • cAMP accumulation was measured as described in Figure 2. Agents were as follows: WIN55212-2, WIN55212-3, anandamide, 2-AG, PEA (16:0), palmitic acid, myristylethanolamide [acyl-EA (14:0)], pentadecanoylethanolamide [acyl-EA (15:0)], palmitoleylethanolamide [acyl-EA (16:1)], margaroylethanolamide [acyl-EA (17:0)], stearoylethanolamide [acyl-EA (18:0)], palmitoylisopropylamide (iso-PEA), R-palmitoyl-(1-methyl)ethanolamide (1-meth-PEA), R-palmitoyl-(2-methyl)ethanolamide (2-meth-PEA), abn-CBD, and capsaicin. Results are expressed as percentage of the forskolin response measured within individual experiments. Values are means ± SEMs of 9-36 independent quantifications of cAMP (i.e., 3-12 separate experiments performed in triplicate).

  • ** p < 0.01, significantly different from forskolin response (ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post-test).