Table 1.

Comparison of structural properties and capsaicin sensitivity among mechanosensitive colon afferent fibers in control (C57BL/6), TRPV1 knock-out, and ASIC3 knock-out mice

Muscular Mucosal Muscular/mucosal Serosal
Strain rf (mm2) cv (m/s) cap + rf (mm2) cv (m/s) cap + rf (mm2) cv (m/s) cap + rf (mm2) cv (m/s) cap +
Control 3.0 ± 0.3 0.70 ± 0.05 4.0 ± 0.3 0.74 ± 0.04 3.4 ± 0.3 0.76 ± 0.04 2.7 ± 0.8 0.69 ± 0.09
(n) (10) (9) 6/10 (11) (11) 3/6 (12) (10) 8/11 (10) (9) 2/9
TRPV1 3.3 ± 0.4 0.73 ± 0.05 1.6* ± 0.4 0.60 ± 0.06 3.4 ± 0.3 0.70 ± 0.04 1.4 ± 0.4 0.58 ± 0.04
(n) (14) (8) 0/8 (9) (8) 0/8 (21) (11) 0/9 (12) (8) 0/6
ASIC3 2.5 ± 0.4 0.37 ± 0.12 2.6* ± 0.4 0.71 ± 0.05 3.0 ± 0.4 0.75 ± 0.07 1.7 ± 0.4 0.55 ± 0.06
(n) (11) (3) 3/8 (15) (8) 4/10 (14) (5) 1/8 (12) (4) 2/8
  • All afferent fibers were determined to be C-fibers, with conduction velocities (cv) < 2 m/s. Receptive field area (rf) varied significantly based on fiber type and mouse strain (two-way ANOVA; afferent type, p = 0.007; strain, p = 0.018). Post hoc testing revealed that receptive fields of muscular/mucosal afferents were significantly larger than those of serosal afferents (p = 0.003) and that mucosal afferent receptive fields in TRPV1 knock-out and ASIC3 knock-out mice were significantly smaller than those in control mice (*p < 0.05 for both analyses). The capsaicin (cap) sensitivity of pelvic nerve colon afferent fibers was tested by application of capsaicin (3 μm, 2 min) to receptive fields at the end of the experiment to avoid potential desensitizing effects of the drug. A proportion of all four afferent fiber types in control and ASIC3 knock-out mice responded to capsaicin, although it did not activate any afferent fiber tested in TRPV1 knock-out mice. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.