DA | DOPAC | HVA | DOPAC/DA | HVA/DA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 15.63 ± 0.45 | 0.77 ± 0.05 | 1.12 ± 0.08 | 5.32 ± 0.21 | 7.72 ± 0.32 |
Haloperidol | 12.80 ± 0.89 | 2.90 ± 0.20** | 2.94 ± 0.24** | 22.67 ± 0.52** | 22.93 ± 0.62** |
Rolipram | 18.22 ± 1.33 | 1.05 ± 0.04 | 1.25 ± 0.10 | 5.85 ± 0.29 | 6.86 ± 0.24 |
Papaverine | 15.31 ± 1.38 | 1.05 ± 0.13 | 1.38 ± 0.12 | 6.80 ± 0.36 | 9.01 ± 0.18 |
Haloperidol plus rolipram | 12.72 ± 0.37 | 4.06 ± 0.16**,††,¶¶ | 2.81 ± 0.14**,†† | 31.96 ± 1.14**,††,¶¶ | 22.02 ± 0.60**,†† |
Haloperidol plus papaverine | 11.69 ± 1.20 | 2.82 ± 0.23**,§§ | 2.27 ± 0.24**,§§,¶ | 24.52 ± 1.04**,§§ | 19.65 ± 1.18**,§§,¶¶ |
Mice were treated with vehicle, rolipram (10 mg/kg) alone, papaverine (30 mg/kg) alone, or in combination with haloperidol (0.3 mg/kg) and killed 30 min later by focused microwave irradiation. Striatum was dissected and analyzed for dopamine (DA) and its metabolites, DOPAC and HVA. Data represent means ± SEM for 4–5 experiments. **p < 0.01 compared with control; †† p < 0.01 compared with rolipram alone; §§ p < 0.01 compared with papaverine alone; ¶ p < 0.05, ¶¶ p < 0.01 compared with haloperidol alone; one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls test.