Table 1.

Summary of results from intracellular recordings during light and no-light epochs

Up-state latency (ms)Early depolarization amplitude (mV)
No lightLightNo lightLight
No treatment (n = 14)Baseline394 ± 23319 ± 271.8 ± 0.33.8 ± 0.7
BIC into SC (n = 7)Baseline531 ± 59475 ± 531.5 ± 0.64.0 ± 0.5
5 min after SC BIC358 ± 71115 ± 144.2 ± 1.313.3 ± 1.8
AMPT/BIC into SC (n = 7)Baseline375 ± 23359 ± 190.5 ± 0.21.9 ± 0.3b
5 min after SC BIC338 ± 39125 ± 83.3 ± 0.813.7 ± 2.1
BIC into Cx (n = 4)Baseline491 ± 54480 ± 551.9 ± 0.83.6 ± 0.7
5 min after Cx BIC490 ± 62505 ± 80a1.7 ± 0.62.6 ± 0.8a
MUS onto Cx (n = 4)Baseline after MUS699 ± 204652 ± 2500.7 ± 0.31.6 ± 0.3b
5 min after SC BIC411 ± 68136 ± 171.7 ± 0.613.4 ± 3.0
MUS/BAC into thalamus (n = 5)Baseline after MUS/BAC725 ± 93768 ± 1290.7 ± 0.20.7 ± 0.3b
5 min after SC BIC463 ± 77215 ± 39a1.1 ± 0.33.2 ± 0.7a
  • BIC ejection into the SC induced visual responses characterized by short up-state latencies and large early depolarization amplitudes measured from the down state (highlighted).

  • aA significantly weaker visual response after BIC compared with the BIC into SC group (Wilcoxon's rank sum test, p < 0.05). Note that (1) BIC ejection into the cortex (Cx) failed to induce increased visual responsiveness and that (2) only MUS/BAC ejection into the thalamus significantly diminished visual response strength after BIC into the SC.

  • bSignificantly decreased membrane potential fluctuations at baseline induced by AMPT or MUS pretreatment (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon's rank sum test).