Table 1.

Effects of NGF and receptor blocking on motoneuronal sensitivities and recruitment threshold

Treatment	N	k (sp/s/deg)	r (sp/s/deg/s)	Th (deg)
Control	70	6.40 ± 0.26	0.73 ± 0.04	−7.10 ± 0.86
Axotomy	53	3.54 ± 0.25^*	0.47 ± 0.03^*	−6.62 ± 1.00
NGF	134	9.37 ± 0.30^*^{^†}	0.93 ± 0.03^*^{^†}	−2.22 ± 0.31^*^{^†}
NGF+k252a	46	5.31 ± 0.34^{^†^‡}	0.65 ± 0.04^{^†^‡}	−1.59 ± 1.51^*^{^†}
NGF+k252a+REX	39	4.34 ± 0.27^*^{^‡}	0.53 ± 0.04^*^{^‡}	−5.28 ± 0.73

↵Values are means ± SEM. Symbols indicate significant differences between control (*), axotomy (^†), and NGF (^‡) groups (one-way ANOVA, Holm–Sidak method for post hoc comparisons, p < 0.05). Th, Threshold.