Table 4.

Accuracy (percent correct) and response latency (milliseconds) of correct trials for experiments 2 through 4

Object ensemblesTextures
IdenticalSharedDifferentIdenticalSharedDifferent
Accuracy (% correct)
    Experiment 295.96 ± 1.5793.70 ± 2.6297.39 ± 0.6390.37 ± 3.1788.20 ± 2.3295.97 ± 1.30
    Experiment 396.77 ± 0.6591.46 ± 2.1897.77 ± 1.2489.60 ± 3.1086.79 ± 2.4297.39 ± 0.63
    Experiment 495.46 ± 1.0693.18 ± 2.1097.73 ± 0.85
Response latency (ms)
    Experiment 2786 ± 45891 ± 49836 ± 50808 ± 39938 ± 63858 ± 59
    Experiment 3812 ± 45930 ± 58821 ± 46858 ± 49954 ± 65827 ± 55
    Experiment 4915 ± 381021 ± 43885 ± 28
  • All values represent mean ± SE. Significant pairwise comparisons (all two tailed and Bonferroni corrected) for accuracy are as follows: textures in experiment 2, shared vs different, t(13) = 3.83, p = 0.006; textures in experiment 3, shared vs different, t(13) = 4.53, p = 0.002. Significant pairwise comparisons for response latency are as follows: object ensembles in experiment 2, shared vs identical, t(13) = 5.05, p = 0.001; textures in experiment 2, shared vs identical, t(13) = 4.06, p = 0.004; shared vs different, t(13) = 2.86, p = 0.036; object ensembles in experiment 3, shared vs identical, t(13) = 5.36, p = 0.001; shared vs different, t(13) = 3.52, p = 0.011; textures in experiment 3, shared vs identical, t(13) = 3.01, p = 0.03; shared vs different, t(13) = 3.34, p = 0.017; object ensembles in experiment 4, shared vs identical, t(10) = 3.89, p = 0.01; shared vs different, t(10) = 3.49, p = 0.017.