Table 2.

Effects of object ensemble and surface texture adaptation in RSC, TOS, and pFs for all four experiments

	Main effect		Planned comparisons
	Main effect		Object ensembles			Textures
	Image	Condition	Identical vs shared	Identical vs different	Shared vs different	Identical vs shared	Identical vs different	Shared vs different
RSC
Experiment 1		F_(2,22) = 3.91 p = 0.035		t₍₁₁₎ = 3.83 p = 0.005	t₍₁₁₎ = 2.71 p = 0.03
Experiment 2		F_(2,24) = 3.86 p = 0.035					t₍₁₂₎ = 2.76 p = 0.025
Experiment 3		F_(2,24) = 6.03 p = 0.008
Experiment 4	N/A	F_(2,18) = 5.11 p = 0.017			t₍₉₎ = 3.53 p = 0.011	N/A	N/A	N/A
TOS
Experiment 1				t₍₁₁₎ = 2.95 p = 0.02
Experiment 2		F_(2,26) = 5.85 p = 0.008	t₍₁₃₎ = 3.05 p = 0.013
Experiment 3
Experiment 4	N/A					N/A	N/A	N/A
pFs
Experiment 1		F_(2,22) = 20.90 p = 0.001		t₍₁₁₎ = 3.88 p = 0.004	t₍₁₁₎ = 2.55 p = 0.042		t₍₁₁₎ = 3.95 p = 0.004
Experiment 2	F_(1,13) = 66.77 p = 0.001	F_(2,26) = 12.17 p = 0.001	t₍₁₃₎ = 2.76 p = 0.027	t₍₁₃₎ = 3.05 p = 0.013
Experiment 3	F_(1,13) = 30.88 p = 0.001
Experiment 4	N/A					N/A	N/A	N/A

Image indicates ensemble and texture. Condition indicates identical, shared, and different. Image-by-condition interaction was not significant in any of the experiments. Main effects, interactions, and planned pairwise comparisons were assessed (one tailed, Bonferroni corrected). Left and right hemispheres were combined because no difference in activation was observed between the hemispheres. Only significant results are shown. N/A, Not applicable.