Table 2.

Statistical analysis of the performance of Stop-CB1, WT, and CB1-RS mice in fear extinction

Repeated-measures ANOVA	Factor	F	p	Post hoc G	p
For 20 s time bins
d1	G × T	F_{(9.20,124.22)} = 1.40	0.193	Stop-CB1 vs WT	0.033
	T	F_{(4.60,124.22)} = 28.19	<0.001	Stop-CB1 vs CB1-RS	0.005
	G	F_(2,27) = 6.70	0.004	WT vs CB1-RS	1.000
d2	G × T	F_{(11.42,154.15)} = 1.76	0.062	Stop-CB1 vs WT	0.025
	T	F_{(5.71,154.15)} = 16.55	<0.001	Stop-CB1 vs CB1-RS	0.008
	G	F_(2,27) = 6.41	0.005	WT vs CB1-RS	1.000
d3	G × T	F_{(9.94,134.24)} = 0.88	0.557	Stop-CB1 vs WT	0.008
	T	F_{(4.97,134.24)} = 16.02	<0.001	Stop-CB1 vs CB1-RS	0.137
	G	F_(2,27) = 5.56	0.010	WT vs CB1-RS	0.723
d10	G × T	F_{(8.39,113.27)} = 0.76	0.642	Stop-CB1 vs WT	<0.001
	T	F_{(4.20,113.27)} = 7.71	<0.001	Stop-CB1 vs CB1-RS	0.027
	G	F_(2,27) = 12.47	<0.001	WT vs CB1-RS	0.120
For days
Tone minus Baseline	G × T	F_(6,81) = 1.41	0.220	Stop-CB1 vs WT	<0.001
	T	F_(3,81) = 36.02	<0.001	Stop-CB1 vs CB1-RS	0.003
	G	F_(2,27) = 10.62	<0.001	WT vs CB1-RS	1.000
Initial 20 s minus Baseline	G × T	F_(6,81) = 2.17	0.054	Stop-CB1 vs WT	nd
	T	F_(3,81) = 23.83	<0.001	Stop-CB1 vs CB1-RS	nd
	G	F_(2,27) = 2.02	0.152	WT vs CB1-RS	nd
Baseline	G × T	F_(6,81) = 0.39	0.885	Stop-CB1 vs WT	nd
	T	F_(3,81) = 47.60	<0.001	Stop-CB1 vs CB1-RS	nd
	G	F_(2,27) = 0.02	0.982	WT vs CB1-RS	nd
After tone	G × T	F_(6,81) = 0.30	0.937	Stop-CB1 vs WT	0.004
	T	F_(3,81) = 8.65	<0.001	Stop-CB1 vs CB1-RS	0.181
	G	F_(2,27) = 6.52	0.005	WT vs CB1-RS	0.336