Table 2.

Rhythmicity data of ITP-overexpressing flies and controls in DD

GenotypePeriod in hours (SEM) (n rhythmic flies)Power (SEM)Rhythmic flies
UAS-ITP2/+ (ITP2)23.4 (0.07) (30)29.6 (1.2)100%
tim(UAS)G4/+24.1 (0.04) (30)39.9 (2.30)97%
tim(UAS)G4>ITP225.0 (0.25) (2)19.8 (2.16)7%**
timG4/+24.6 (0.11) (23)22.2 (1.18)74%
timG4>ITP2– (–) (0)– (–)0%**
pdfG4/+24.4 (0.06) (30)31.7 (1.59)97%
pdfG4>ITP223.7 (0.10) (31)21.4 (0.70)97%
perG425.3 (0.16) (31)32.1 (2.03)97%
perG4>ITP223.7 (0.04) (29)29.1 (1.66)100%
clk856G4/+23.8 (0.04) (32)41.0 (1.89)100%
clk856G4>ITP223.3 (0.04) (32)35.2 (1.82)100%
cryG439/+25.2 (0.16) (24)22.9 (1.60)75%
cryG439>ITP223.9 (0.06) (26)21.5 (1.21)81%
elavG4/+23.7 (0.06) (25)23.8 (1.73)83%
elavG4>ITP223.6 (0.06) (20)28.7 (2.53)100%
386y(amon)G4/+23.1 (0.77) (31)29.1 (2.04)97%
386y(amon)G4>ITP223.5 (0.05) (27)26.7 (1.19)100%
  • Percentage of rhythmicity and period lengths of ITP-overexpressing strains were always compared with the respective GAL4-control and UAS-ITP2-control.

  • **Highly significant differences (for statistical values, see main text).