Table 1.

RT for old/new responses and mean corrected recollection and familiarity rates

	REC	FAM	NEW
RT (ms)	1173 (167)	1393 (183)	1416 (233)
Corrected hit rates (%)	39.1 (15.8)	20.8 (12.6)	—

Mean values (± SD) are given based on n = 20 subjects. For mean RT, there was a main effect of condition (F_(2,38) = 20.17, p < 0.001, η² = 0.515, ϵ = 0.716). Responses were faster for REC compared with NEW (t₍₁₉₎ = 5.03, p < 0.001) and FAM (t₍₁₉₎ = 8.56, p < 0.001). There was no difference between FAM and NEW (t₍₁₉₎ = 0.47, p = 0.645).