Table 1.

ROI-based results for item-specific encoding, retrieval, and ERSa

EncodingRetrievalERS
F(1,19)pF(1,19)pF(1,19)p
LVVC40.0690.0000*4.9820.03791.7120.2064
RVVC53.0180.0000*8.8980.00760.5270.4767
LAG1.2960.269126.7790.0001*9.0480.0072
RAG2.1500.158912.5870.0021*1.4340.2458
LSMG1.1040.306624.0180.0001*8.4330.0091
RSMG0.2900.59646.4190.02031.8470.1901
LIFG4.6390.044319.3770.0003*4.1620.0555
RIFG1.7660.19964.9270.03880.5760.4571
LMFG2.3670.140420.9150.0002*8.5620.0087
RMFG1.6830.210014.3000.0013*1.0590.3164
LSFG0.0130.910810.3570.00452.1320.1606
RSFG0.0450.83476.4880.01970.6870.4176
mPFC0.0010.97994.6280.04451.0750.3129
PCC1.4840.238012.6650.0021*8.7380.0081
  • aThe numbers in the table indicate the comparison results between pattern similarities of different cues-same picture (CP+) pairs and that of different cues-different pictures pairs (CP; matched with the CP+ pairs in memory performance, stimulus category, and lag).

  • *Significant results after Bonferroni correction across 14 ROIs (p < 0.05/14).