Table 3.

Two-way ANOVA results for reconstruction parameter changes (s_dist_attn × attention hemifield)

	V1	V2	V3	V4	V3A/B	IPS0	V1-V4	V3A/B and IPS0
Omnibus test
Position	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}
Size	0.216	0.565	0.019	0.428	0.006^{^a}	0.121	0.001^{^a}	0.110
Amplitude	0.174	0.579	0.024^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	0.008^{^a}	0.016^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}
Baseline	0.088	0.734	0.934	<0.001^{^a}	0.001^{^a}	0.937	0.015^{^a}	0.241
Main effect of distance
Position	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	0.192	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}
Size	—	—	—	—	0.484	—	0.019^{^a}	—
Amplitude	—	—	0.140	0.002^{^a}	0.005^{^a}	0.478	0.100	0.002^{^a}
Baseline	—	—	—	0.829	0.916	—	0.210	—
Main effect of attention
Position	0.371	0.916	0.346	0.067	0.005^{^a}	0.254	0.401	0.343
Size	—	—	—	—	0.003^{^a}	—	0.005^{^a}	—
Amplitude	—	—	0.069	<0.001^{^a}	0.005^{^a}	0.158	0.049^{^a}	0.004
Baseline	—	—	—	0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	—	0.004^{^a}	—
Interaction of distance and attention
Position	0.052	0.588	0.541	0.657	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	0.121	0.026
Size	—	—	—	—	0.077	—	0.271	—
Amplitude	—	—	0.064	<0.001^{^a}	<0.001^{^a}	0.004^{^a}	0.224	<0.001^{^a}
Baseline	—	—	—	0.019	0.011	—	0.370	—

↵^ap value passed FDR correction (q = 0.05, corrected across ROIs and comparisons within each parameter).