Table 1.

Detailed information of statistical analyses

FiguresSample size (n)Statistical methodsp value, t value, and df
1Gn = 3 independent experiments at each time pointOne-way ANOVA (p = 0.0062, F(3,8) = 8.193) with Tukey's post testOPCs versus D1 OLs, **p < 0.01
OPCs versus D2 OLs, *p < 0.05
OPCs versus D4 OLs, p > 0.05
1Kn = 145 OPCs and 116 OLs from 3 mice at P8Two-tailed unpairedP8, ***p < 0.0001 (t = 34.33, df = 259)
n = 125 OPCs and 101 OLs from 3 mice at P14Student's t testP14, ***p < 0.0001 (t = 14.87, df = 124)
2Dn = 5 sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedMBP, **p < 0.002 (t = 4.779, df = 7)
n = 4 Cnp-Cre, Sox2fl/flStudent's t testSMI312, p = 0.178 ( t = 1.497, df = 7)
3Dn = 6 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedOlig2+CC1+, **p = 0.0012 (t = 4.879, df = 8)
n = 4 Cnp-Cre, Sox2fl/flStudent's t testOlig2+PDGFRa+, p = 0.2314 (t = 1.295, df = 8)
3En = 6 sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedp = 0.0041 (t = 3.975, df = 8)
n = 4 Cnp-Cre, Sox2fl/flStudent's t test
4Bn = 6 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedOlig2+CC1+, p = 0.3783 (t = 0.9326, df = 8)
n = 4 Cnp-Cre, Sox2fl/flStudent's t test
4Dn = 8 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedSox2, **p = 0.0055 (t = 3.5424, df = 10)
n = 4 Cnp-Cre, Sox2fl/flStudent's t testMbp, p = 0.5097 (t = 0.6837, df = 10)
Plp, p = 0.119 (t = 1.705, df = 10)
Mag, p = 0.6681 (t = 0.4417, df = 10)
Mobp, p = 0.3381 (t = 1.006, df = 10)
Sox10, p = 0.3774 (t = 0.9237, df = 10)
4En = 3 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedp < 0.0001 (t = 42.99, df = 5)
n = 4 Cnp-Cre, Sox2fl/flStudent's t test
5Cn = 7 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedSox10+PDGFRα+, ***p < 0.0001 (t = 6.838, df = 12)
(cell #)n = 7 Pdgfra-CreERT2, Sox2fl/flStudent's t testSox10+, ***p < 0.0001 (t = 7.854, df = 12)
5Cn = 4 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedSox2, p = 0.0145 (t = 3.398, df = 6)
(mRNA)n = 4 Pdgfra-CreERT2, Sox2fl/flStudent's t testPdgfra, p = 0.0032 (t = 4.745, df = 6)
5Fn = 3 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedSox10+, p = 0.0009 (t = 8.856, df = 4)
n = 3 Pdgfra-CreERT2, Sox2fl/flStudent's t testSox10+PDGFRα+, p = 0.0007 (t = 8.856, df = 4)
Sox10+CC1+, p = 0.0122 (t = 4.344, df = 4)
5Hn = 6 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpaired Student's t testSox2, p = 0.0042 (t = 3, df = 10)
n = 6 Pdgfra-CreERT2, Sox2fl/flPlp-Exon3b, p = 0.0027 (t = 3.964, df = 10)
Mbp, p = 0.0002 (t = 5.638, df = 10)
Mog, p = 0.0272 (t = 2.585, df = 10)
Bcas1, ***p < 0.0001 (t = 10.02, df = 10)
Ugt8a, ***p < 0.0001 (t = 8.683, df = 10)
Bmp4, ***p < 0.0001 (t = 11.27, df = 10)
Qk, p = 0.0012 (t = 4.461, df = 10)
5In = 7 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpaired***p < 0.0001 (t = 7.504, df = 12)
n = 7 Pdgfra-CreERT2, Sox2fl/flStudent's t test
6B (EdU)n = 5 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedEdU+Sox10+ cells, p = 0.0137 (t = 3.053, dt = 9)
n = 6 Pdgfra-CreERT2, Sox2fl/flStudent's t test
6B (Ki67)n = 4 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedKi67+Sox10+ cells, ***p < 0.0001 (t = 7.544, df = 7)
n = 5 Pdgfra-CreERT2, Sox2fl/flStudent's t test
6Dn = 3 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedCaspase3+Sox10+, p = 0.4683 (t = 0.8008, df = 4)
n = 3 Pdgfra-CreERT2, Sox2fl/flStudent's t testTUNEL+Sox10+, p = 0.1737 (t = 1.653, df = 4)
7An = 8 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpaired***p < 0.0001 (t = 7.163, df = 10)
n = 4 Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/flStudent's t test
7Cn = 5 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedMBP, p = 0.0059 (t = 3.904, df = 7)
n = 4 Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/flStudent's t testSMI312, p = 0.6733 (t = 0.4398, df = 7)
7Dn = 3 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedSox2, ***p < 0.0001 (t = 18.73, df = 5)
n = 4 Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/flStudent's t testSox3, p = 0.9522 (t = 0.06302, df = 5)
MBP, p = 0.0098 (t = 4.052, df = 5)
CNP, p = 0.0072 (t = 4.378, df = 5)
MAG, p = 0.0278 (t = 3.070, df = 5)
7En = 6 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedSox2, p = 0.0116 (t = 3.157, df = 9)
n = 4 Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/flStudent's t testMbp, p = 0.0093 (t = 3.298, df = 9)
Plp-E3b, p = 0.0404 (t = 2.392, df = 9)
7G (OPCs)n = 7 Sox2fl/flOPCs: one-way ANOVA (***p < 0.0001, F(2,13) = 24.87) with Tukey's post testSox2fl/fl versus Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/+, p > 0.05
n = 5 Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/+Sox2fl/fl versus Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/fl, ***p < 0.0001
n = 4 Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/flSox10-Cre, Sox2fl/+ versus Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/fl, ***p < 0.001
7G (OLs)n = 7 Sox2fl/flOLs: one-way ANOVA (***p = 0.0003, F(2,13) = 15.84) with Tukey's post testSox2fl/fl versus Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/+, p > 0.05; Sox2fl/fl versus Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/fl, ***p < 0.0001
n = 5 Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/+Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/+ versus Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/fl, **p < 0.01
n = 4 Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/fl
7In = 6 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedPDGFRα+ OPCs, ***p < 0.0001 (t = 6.392, df = 8)
n = 4 Sox10-Cre, Sox2fl/flStudent's t testCC1+ OLs, **p < 0.001 (t = 4.848, df = 8)
8Dn = 89 OPCs and 80 OLs from 3 miceTwo-tailed unpaired Student's t test***p < 0.0001 (t = 25.89, df = 167)
8Gn = 4 CFATwo-tailed unpaired***p < 0.0001 (t = 17.9, df = 6)
n = 4 MOGStudent's t test
8In = 99 OPCs and 62 OLs from 3 miceTwo-tailed unpaired***p < 0.0001 (t = 20.67, df = 159)
Student's t test
9B3n = 3 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedSox2, p = 0.0262 (t = 3, df = 4)
n = 3 Pdgfra-CreERT2, Sox2fl/flStudent's t test
9Dn = 3 Sox2fl/flTwo-tailed unpairedCC1+ OLs, p = 0.0018 (t = 7.382, df = 4)
n = 3 Pdgfra-CreERT2, Sox2fl/flStudent's t testCC1+BrdU+ OLs, p = 0.0175 (t = 3.904, df = 4)
PDGFRα+ OPCs, p = 0.0100 (t = 4.608, df = 4)
PDGFRα+Ki67+ OPCs, p = 0.0007 (t = 9.604, df = 4)
9Fn = 3 Sox2 WT + CuprizoneOne-way ANOVA (***p < 0.0001, F(2,6) = 100.2) with Tukey's post testSox2 WT + Cup versus Sox2 cKO + Cup, ***p < 0.001
n = 3 Sox2 cKO + CuprizoneSox2 WT + Cup versus Sox2 WT + normal diet, ***p < 0.001
n = 4 Sox2 WT + normal dietSox2 cKO + Cup versus Sox2 WT + normal diet, p > 0.05
9Hn = 3 Sox2 WTTwo-tailed unpairedMBP, p = 0.0287 (t = 3.346, df = 4)
n = 3 Sox2 cKOStudent's t testSMI312, p = 0.4334 (t = 0.9699, df = 4)
10Cn = 3 Sox2 WT + MOGOne-way ANOVA (***p = 0.0009, F(2,6) = 27.90) with Tukey's post testSox2 WT + MOG versus Sox2 cKO + MOG, **p < 0.01
n = 3 Sox2 cKO + MOGSox2 WT + MOG versus Sox2 WT + CFA, ***p < 0.001
n = 3 Sox2 WT + CFASox2 cKO + MOG versus Sox2 WT + CFA, p > 0.05
10En = 3 Sox2 WT + MOGTwo-tailed unpairedp = 0.0019 (t = 7.303, df = 4)
n = 3 Sox2 cKO + MOGStudent's t test
10Fn = 3 Sox2 WT + MOGOne-way ANOVA (***p < 0.0001, F(2,6) = 69.92) with Tukey's post testSox2 WT + MOG versus Sox2 cKO + MOG, ***p < 0.001
n = 3 Sox2 cKO + MOGSox2 WT + MOG versus Sox2 WT + CFA, ***p < 0.001
n = 3 Sox2 WT + CFASox2 cKO + MOG versus Sox2 WT + CFA, p > 0.05