Table 2.

Significant effects of the different EV models, across hi_ID and no_ID conditions, during the room-choice perioda

ContrastRegionPeak MNICluster size
IDEV (Hi_ID>No_ID)Mid-cingulate0, 2, 281232
Anterior cingulate2, 38, 18
RLPFC26, 50, 14
Left premotor−26, 8, 521256
Correlation between above contrast and behavioral choice preferencesRight STG
Right LOFC
Right insula
Right IFG
62, −4, 4
46, 52, 0
40, 12, 2
52, 36, 0
2907
Left STG−44, −12, 01938
Left insula−38, −4, 6
Left LOFC−44, 34, −14
Left IFG−54, 22, 6
$ EV (Hi_ID-No_ID) (-)Right precentral/postcentral gyrus40, 2, 382134
Right IFG34, 12, 32
Right MTG64, −46, 121523
Right ITG52, −62, 4
Left lingual gyrus−28, −92, −141340
Left cerebellum−12, −58, −16
polEV (Hi_ID>No_ID) (-)Left precentral/postcentral gyrus−34, −30, 701157
  • aSnPM-corrected cluster sizes are shown in the fourth column, with empty rows indicating that a cluster is continuous with that listed above. (-), Negative correlation; STG, superior temporal gyrus; LOFC, lateral orbitofrontal gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus.