Abstract
In the first experiment, after a 10-min baseline test on a rapid information processing task, subjects received oral doses of either placebo, methscopolamine 1.2 mg, scopolamine 0.6 mg or scopolamine 1.2 mg, and 1 h later performed the task again for a 20-min period. Following scopolamine 1.2 mg, correct detections were significantly lower over the 20-min period, whereas no such decrement was observed in the other three conditions. In the second experiment a similar design was used to study the effects of nicotine 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg and 1.5 mg and placebo, except that post-drug testing was carried out 10 min after baseline due to the faster absorption of nicotine. Nicotine helped prevent both the decline in detections and the increase in reaction time which occurred over time in the placebo condition. These findings indicate that compounds with opposite effects on central cholinergic pathways produce opposite effects on the performance of a task involving rapid information processing, and are consistent with previous findings from this laboratory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown K, Warburton DM (1971) Attenuation of stimulus sensitivity by scopolamine. Psychon Sci 22:297–298
Crow TJ, Grove-White IG (1973) An analysis of the learning deficit following scopolamine administration. Br J Pharmacol 49:322–327
Crow TJ, Cross AJ, Grove-White IG, Ross DG (1982) Central neurotransmitters, memory and dementia. In: Wheatley D (ed) Psychopharmacology of old age. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York Toronto, pp 24–36
Domino EF, Corssen G (1967) Central and peripheral effects of muscarinic blocking agents in man. Anesthesiology 28:568–574
Il'yuchenok RYu, Ostrovskaya RU (1962) The role of mesencephalic cholinergic systems in the mechanism of nicotine activation of the electroencephalogram. Exp Biol Med 54:753–757
Kawamura M, Domino EF (1969) Differential actions of m and n cholinergic agonists on the brain stem activating system. Int J Neuropharmacol 8:105–115
Kirk RE (1968) Experimental design: procedures for the behavioural sciences. Brooks/Cole, Belmont
Warburton DM (1975) Brain, drugs and behaviour. Wiley, London
Warburton DM (1977) Stimulus selection and behavioral inhibition. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol 8: Drugs, neurotransmitters, and behavior. Plenum, New York, pp 385–432
Warburton DM (1981) Neurochemical bases of behaviour. Br Med Bull 37:121–125
Warburton DM, Brown K (1972) The facilitation of discrimination performance by physostigmine sulphate. Psychopharmacologia 27:275–284
Wesnes K, Warburton DM (1978) The effects of cigarette smoking and nicotine tablets upon human attention. In: Thornton RE (ed) Smoking behaviour: physiological and psychological influences. Churchill-Livingston, London, pp 131–147
Wesnes K, Warburton DM (1983a) Effects of scopolamine on stimulus sensitivity and response bias in a visual vigilance task. Neuropsychobiology 9:154–157
Wesnes K, Warburton DM (1983b) Effects of smoking on rapid visual information processing performance. Neuropsychobiology 9:223–229
Wesnes K, Warburton DM (1983c) Smoking, nicotine and human performance. Pharmacol Ther 21:189–208
Wesnes K, Warburton DM, Matz B (1983) Effects of nicotine on stimulus sensitivity and response bias in a visual vigilance task. Neuropsychobiology 9:41–44
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wesnes, K., Warburton, D.M. Effects of scopolamine and nicotine on human rapid information processing performance. Psychopharmacology 82, 147–150 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427761
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427761