Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Visual motion, binocular correspondence and binocular rivalry

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human observers dichoptically viewed displays consisting of isotropic random dots, with the dots in each eye's view all moving in a given direction or appearing stationary. When the interocular difference in direction of motion was less than 30 deg, a stable, fused percept resulted. Once this interocular difference was exceeded, binocular rivalry ensued. Rivalry was also obtained when dots seen by the two eyes moved in identical directions but at different velocities. Under this condition, the proportion of time that rivalry was experienced increased with the interocular difference in velocity. Moving dots predominated over stationary ones, and when both sets of dots moved there was no clear advantage of one speed of motion over the other. Contrary to some earlier reports, these results show that motion is not immune to binocular rivalry. Evidently the process responsible for establishing binocular correspondence between images received by the two eyes is sensitive to disparities in direction and velocity of motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blakemore C (1970) A new kind of stereopsis. Vision Res 10:1181–1199

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore C, Campbell FW (1969) On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol 203:237–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddick O (1979) Binocular single vision and perceptual processing. Proc R Soc Lond B 204:503–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Breese BB (1899) On inhibition. Psychol Monogr 3:1–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox R, Todd S, Bettinger LA (1975) Optokinetic nystagmus as an objective indicator of binocular rivalry. Vision Res 15:849–853

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollins M (1980) The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry. Percept Psychophys 27:550–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollins M, Leung EHL (1978) The influence of color on binocular rivalry. In: Armington JC, Krauskopf J, Wooten BR (eds) Visual psychophysics and physiology. Academic Press, New York, pp 181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz B, Miller JE (1975) Independent spatial frequency-tuned channels in binocular fusion and rivalry. Perception 4:125–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertesz AE, Jones RW (1970) Human cyclofusional response. Vision Res 10:891–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt WJM (1965) On binocular rivalry. Institute for Perception RVO-TNO, Soesterberg, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson E, Sekuler R (1980) A two-dimensional analysis of direction specific adaptation. Vision Res 20:103–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr D, Poggio T (1979) A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proc R Soc Lond B 204:301–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshak W, Sekuler RW (1979) Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. Science 205:1399–1401

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunsell JHR, Van Essen DC (1983) Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the Macaque Monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. J Neurophysiol 49:1148–1167

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew JD, Nikara T, Bishop PO (1968) Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex: simultaneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence. Exp Brain Res 6:391–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan D, Beverley Kl, Cynader M (1979) Stereoscopic subsystems for position in depth and for motion in depth. Proc R Soc Lond B 204:485–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabrin H, Kertesz A (1983) The effect of imposed fixational eye movements on binocular rivalry. Percept Psychophys 34:155–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Tynan P, Sekuler RW (1977) Rapid measurement of contrast sensitivity functions. Am J Optom Physiol Optics 54:573–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade NJ (1974) Monocular and binocular rivalry between contours. Perception 4:85–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade NJ, De Weert CMM, Swanston MT (1984) Binocular rivalry with moving patterns. Percept Psychophys 35:111–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeki SM (1979) Functional specialization and binocular interaction in the visual areas of rhesus monkey prestriate cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B 204:379–397

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lynn Zimba

    Present address: Dartmouth College, 03755, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychologyand, Northwestern University, 60201, Evanston, IL, USA

    Randolph Blake

  2. Department of Neurobiology/Physiology, Northwestern University, 60201, Evanston, IL, USA

    Lynn Zimba & Douglas Williams

Authors
  1. Randolph Blake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lynn Zimba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Douglas Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blake, R., Zimba, L. & Williams, D. Visual motion, binocular correspondence and binocular rivalry. Biol. Cybern. 52, 391–397 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449596

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449596

Keywords

Search

Navigation