Skip to main content
Log in

Postjunctional characteristics of the endplates in mammalian fast and slow muscles

  • Published:
Pflügers Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have studied the postjunctional characteristics of motor endplates in the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus muscles of the rat. At voltage clamped endplates, equilibrium interactions between acetylcholine (ACh) and the ACh receptor were determined from the dose-response curves obtained by quantitative ionophoresis of ACh. These results showed that the maximum ACh induced conductance change per unit endplate surface,g max, was 21.8±0.9 nS/μm2 in EDL and 8.2±0.9 nS/μm2 in soleus, the apparent dissociation constant,K, was 65.9±4.3 μM in EDL and 43.5±3.3 μM in soleus, and the Hill-coefficient,n H, was 2.3±0.1 in EDL and 2.2±0.1 in soleus.

Single channel characteristics were derived from analysis of the ACh-induced endplate current noise. The results showed that at room temperature the mean conductance of the single channel, γ, was 24.6±1.2 pS in EDL and 23.9±1.2 pS in soleus, and the mean life time of the channel, τ, was 0.80±0.05 ms in EDL and 0.71±0.03 ms in soleus.

Of all the properties studied, the maximum conductance per unit endplate surface,g max, was significantly smaller at the soleus endplate than at the EDL endplate. The calculated density of functional ACh receptors was 62% less, and the total number of the functional ACh receptors was 60% less at the soleus endplates than at the EDL endplates. These results suggest that the soleus has a lower margin of safety for neuromuscular transmission than the EDL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albuquerque EX, McIsaac RJ (1970) Fast and slow mammalian muscles after denervation. Exp Neurol 26:183–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque EX, Thesleff S (1968) A comparative study of membrane properties of innervated and chronically fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat. Acta Physiol Scand 73:471–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque EX, Barnard EA, Porter CW, Warnick JE (1974) The density of acetylcholine receptors and their sensitivity in the postsynaptic membrane of muscle endplates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:2818–2822

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson CR, Stevens CF (1973) Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced endplate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol 235:655–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Cohen MW (1974) Fluorescent staining of acetylcholine receptors in vertebrate skeletal muscle. J Physiol 237:385–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariano MA, Armstrong RB, Edgerton VR (1973) Hindlimb muscle fiber populations of five mammals. J Histochem Cytochem 21:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Barany M, Barany K, Rickard T, Volpe A (1965) Myosin of fast and slow muscles of the rabbit. Arch Biochem Biophys 109:185–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard EA, Rymaszewska T, Wieckowski J (1971) Cholinesterase at individual neuromuscular junctions. In: Triggle DJ, Moran JF, Barnard EA (eds) Cholinergic ligand interactions. Academic Press, New York, pp 175–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Close R (1964) Dynamic properties of fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat during development. J Physiol 173:74–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer F, Mueller KD, Peper K, Sterz R (1976a) The M. omohyoideus of the mouse as a convenient mammalian muscle preparation: a study of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by noise analysis and cooperativity. Pflügers Arch 367:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer F, Walther Chr, Peper K (1976b) Junctional and extrajunctional receptors in normal and denervated frog muscle fibers. Pflügers Arch 366:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer F, Peper K, Sterz R (1978) Determination of dose-response curves by quantitative ionophoresis at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol 281:395–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles LC, Eccles RM, Lundberg A (1958) The action potentials of the alpha motoneurons supplying fast and slow muscles. J Physiol 142:275–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellisman MH, Rash JE, Staehlin LA, Porter KR (1976) Studies of excitable membranes. II. A comparison of specializations at neuromuscular junctions and non-junctional sarcolemmas of mammalian fast and slow twitch muscle fibres. J Cell Biol 68:752–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Fambrough DM (1979) Control of acetylcholine receptors in skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev 59:165–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Fertuck HC, Salpeter MM (1974) Localization of acetylcholine receptor by125I-labelled bungarotoxin at mouse endplates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:1376–1378

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldspink DF, Harris JB, Park DC, Parsons NE, Pennington RJ (1971) Quantitative enzyme studies in deneravated extensor digitorum longus and soleus of rats. J Biochem 2:427–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth L, Samaha FJ (1969) Qualitative differences between actomyosin ATPase of slow and fast mammalian muscle. Exp Neurol 25:138–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohlfeld R, Sterz R, Kalies I, Peper K, Wekerle H (1981) Neuromuscular transmission in experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis (EAMG). Pflügers Arch 390:156–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnovsky MJ, Roots L (1964) A direct coloring thiocholine method for cholinesterase. J Histochem Cytochem 12:219–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul M, Hammer H, Sterz R, Peper K (1982) Immunofluorescence of the acetylcholine receptor in endplates. Pflügers Arch 394 (Suppl): R51

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle JJ, Albuquerque EX (1973) A study of the reinnervation of fast and slow mammalian muscles. J Gen Physiol 61:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Miledi R, Zelena J (1966) Sensitivity to acetylcholine in rat slow muscles. Nature 210:855–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachmias VT, Padykula HA (1958) A histochemical study of normal and denervated and white muscle of the rat. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 4:47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton WDM, Zaimis EJ (1951) The action ofd-tubocurarine and of decamethonium on respiratory and other muscles in the cat. J Physiol 112:311–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Peper K, Sterz R, Bradley RJ (1980) Effects of drugs and antibodies on the postsynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. Ann NY Acad Sci 377:519–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Peper K, Bradley RJ, Dreyer F (1982) The acetylcholine receptor at the neuromuscular junction. Physiol Rev 62:1271–1340

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins N, Olek A, Kelly SS, Takach P, Christopher M (1980) Quantitative study of motor endplates in muscle fibers dissociated by a simple procedure. Proc R Soc Lond B 209:555–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein JM, Padykula HA (1962) Histochemical classification of individual skeletal muscle fibers of the rat. Am J Anat 110:103–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterz R, Pagala MKD, Peper K (1982) Post-junctional properties of motor endplates in mammalian fast and slow muscles. Fed Proc 41:8680

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonge DA (1974) Chronic effects of botulinum toxin on neuromuscular transmission and sensitivity to acetylcholine in slow and fast skeletal muscle of the mouse. J Physiol 241:127–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonemura K (1967) Resting and action potentials in red and white muscle of the rat. Jpn J Physiol 17:708

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 38, project N

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sterz, R., Pagala, M. & Peper, K. Postjunctional characteristics of the endplates in mammalian fast and slow muscles. Pflügers Arch. 398, 48–54 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00584712

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00584712

Key words

Navigation