Skip to main content
Log in

Gating of sensory information: Joint computations of phase and amplitude data in the midbrain of the electric fish,Eigenmannia

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Eigenmannia is able to determine whether the electric organ discharge (EOD) of a neighbor is of higher or lower frequency than its own EOD. For small frequency differences, Df, the fish avoids jamming by shifting its frequency away from that of its neighbor. This jamming avoidance response (JAR), therefore, requires that the fish discriminate the sign of Df. The interference pattern of two EODs of similar frequency is characterized by local modulations of the instantaneous amplitude and the spatial difference of the instantaneous phase, or ‘differential phase’, of the mixed signal. When amplitude and differential phase are plotted in a two-dimensional state plane, circular graphs are obtained with a sense of rotation that reflects the sign of Df.

Behavioral studies have shown that both amplitude and differential phase modulations are required for the control of the JAR. Considering two regions of the body surface, A and B, that receive strong and weak contamination by the jamming signal, respectively, rises and falls of the signal amplitude in A will be accompanied by respective advances and delays of the signal in A relative to that in B if the jamming signal is of lower frequency, i.e. if Df is negative. A plot of amplitude versus differential phase yields a clockwise sense of rotation in this case (Fig. 1). The opposite relation between amplitude and phase modulations, resulting in a counterclockwise rotation, holds for a positive Df. For the less strongly contaminated area B, however, the relation between the sign of Df and the sense of rotation is reversed, so that for a negative Df, a rise of amplitude in B will coincide with a delay of the signal in B relative to that in A.

By independent experimental control of amplitude and differential-phase modulations, we explored midbrain neurons that discriminate the sense of rotations in the amplitude-phase plane. We found that these neurons achieve this discrimination by gating amplitude inputs by differentialphase information, thus exploiting the particular combinations of amplitude and differential phase that characterize a given sense of rotation (Figs. 2–4). Since the response properties of such neurons only reflect the sense of rotation, and since the same sense of rotation can be obtained for either sign of Df (depending upon the relative contamination of the receptive fields involved), individual neurons do not yet provide unambiguous information about the sign of Df. It can be shown, however, that large populations of such neurons will, nevertheless, reliably detect the correct sign of Df (Fig. 7). Response properties of these neurons offer plausible explanations for a number of earlier behavioral observations, particularly for the notion of a precise behavior controlled by a distributed system of unreliable components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen RA, Essick GK, Siegel RM (1985) Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science 230:456–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian J, Heiligenberg W (1980) Neural correlates of the jamming avoidance response inEigenmannia. J Comp Physiol 136:135–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian J, Yuthas J (1984) The jamming avoidance response ofEigenmannia: Properties of a diencephalic link between sensory processing and motor output. J Comp Physiol A 154:895–908

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock TH, Hamstra RH, Scheich H (1972) The jamming avoidance response of high-frequency electric fish. J Comp Physiol 77:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr CE, Maler L, Heiligenberg W, Sas E (1981) Laminar organization of the afferent and efferent systems of the torus semicircularis of gymnotiform fish: Morphological substrates for parallel processing in the electrosensory system. J Comp Neurol 203:649–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr CE, Heiligenberg W, Rose GJ (1986) A time-comparison circuit in the electric fish midbrain. I. Behavior and physiology. J Neurosci 6:107–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank K, Becker MC (1964) Microelectrodes for recording and stimulation. In: Nastuk WL (ed) Physical techniques in biological research, vol 5, part A. Academic Press, New York, pp 23–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W (1980) The jamming avoidance response in the weakly electric fishEigenmannia. Naturwissenschaften 67:499–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W, Bastian J (1980) The control ofEigenmannia's pacemaker by distributed evaluation of electroreceptive afferences. J Comp Physiol 136:113–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W, Dye J (1982) Labelling of electroreceptive afférents in a gymnotoid fish by intracellular injection of HRP: The mystery of multiple maps. J Comp Physiol 148:287–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W, Partridge BL (1981) How electroreceptors encode JAR-eliciting stimulus regimes: Reading trajectories in a phase-amplitude plane. J Comp Physiol 142:295–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W, Rose RJ (1985) Phase and amplitude computations in the midbrain of an electric fish: Intracellular studies of neurons participating in the Jamming Avoidance Response (JAR) ofEigenmannia. J Neurosci 5:515–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W, Baker C, Matsubara JA (1978) The jamming avoidance response inEigenmannia revisited: The structure of a neuronal democracy. J Comp Physiol 127:267–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen El, Konishi M (1979) Mechanisms of sound localization in the barn owl. J Comp Physiol 133:13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi M (1986) Centrally synthesized maps of sensory space. TINS 9:163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge BL, Heiligenberg W, Matsubara JA (1981) The neural basis of a sensory filter in the jamming avoidance response: No Grandmother Cells in sight. J Comp Physiol 145:153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose GJ, Heiligenberg W (1985 a) Structure and function of electrosensory neurons in the torus semicircularis ofEigenmannia: Morphological correlates of phase and amplitude sensitivity. J Neurosci 5:2269–2280

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose GJ, Heiligenberg W (1985b) Temporal hyperacuity in the electric sense of fish. Nature 318:178–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose GJ, Heiligenberg W (1986a) Neural coding of difference frequencies in the midbrain of the electric fishEigenmannia: Reading the sense of rotation in an amplitude-phase plane. J Comp Physiol A 158:613–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose GJ, Heiligenberg W (1986b) Limits of phase and amplitude sensitivity in the torus semicircularis ofEigenmannia. J Comp Physiol A (in press)

  • Saunders J, Bastian J (1984) The physiology and morphology of two types of electrosensory neurons in the weakly electric fishApteronotus leptorhynchus. J Comp Physiol A 154:199–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheich H (1974) Neural analysis of wave form in the time domain: Midbrain units in electric fish during social behavior. Science 185:365–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheich H (1977) Neural basis of communication in the highfrequency electric fishEigenmannia virescens (Jamming Avoidance Response). J Comp Physiol 113:181–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheich H, Bullock TH, Hamstra RH (1973) Coding properties of two classes of afferent nerve fibers: High frequency electroreceptors in the electric fish,Eigenmannia. J Neurophysiol 36:39–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheich H, Bullock TH (1974) The role of electroreceptors in the animal's life. II. The detection of electric fields from electric organs. In: Fessard A (ed) Electroreceptors and other specialized receptors in lower vertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol III/3) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 201–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan WE, Konishi M (1984) Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl. J Neurosci 4:1787–1799

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan WE, Konishi M (1986) A neural map of interaural phase difference in the barn owl's brain stem. Proc Natl Acad USA (submitted)

  • Takahashi T, Moiseff A, Konishi M (1984) Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl. J Neurosci 4:1781–1786

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heiligenberg, W., Rose, G. Gating of sensory information: Joint computations of phase and amplitude data in the midbrain of the electric fish,Eigenmannia . J. Comp. Physiol. 159, 311–324 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603977

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603977

Keywords

Navigation