Skip to main content
Log in

Binaural disparity cues available to the barn owl for sound localization

Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Bilateral recording of cochlear potentials was used to measure the variations in interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural intensity differences (IIDs) as a free-field auditory stimulus was moved to different positions around a barn owl's head.

  2. 2.

    ITD varied smoothly with stimulus azimuth across a broad frequency range.

  3. 3.

    ITD varied minimally with stimulus elevation, except at extreme angles from the horizontal.

  4. 4.

    IID varied with both stimulus elevation and stimulus azimuth. Lower frequencies were more sensitive to variations in azimuth, whereas higher frequencies were more sensitive to variations in elevation.

  5. 5.

    The loci of spatial coordinates that form iso-IID contours and iso-ITD contours form a nonorthogonal grid that relates binaural disparity cues to sound location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

IID :

Interaural intensity difference

ITD :

Interaural time difference

CM :

Cochlear microphonic potential

References

  • Blauert J (1983) Spatial hearing. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass) London

    Google Scholar 

  • Calford MB, Pettigrew JD (1984) Frequency dependence of directional amplification at the cat's pinna. Hearing Res 14:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles RB, Guppy A (1988) Directional hearing in the barn owl (Tyto alba). J Comp Physiol A 163:117–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Esterly S, Knudsen EI (1987) Tuning for interaural difference cues varies with frequency for space-specific neurons in the owl's optic tectum. Neurosci Abstr 13:1468

    Google Scholar 

  • Haresign T, Moiseff A (1988) Early growth and development of the common barn-owl's facial ruff. Auk 105:699–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine DRF (1987) Interaural intensity differences in the cat: changes in sound pressure level at the two ears associated with azimuthal displacements in the frontal horizontal plane. Hearing Res 26:267–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen EI (1980) Sound localization in birds. In: Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative studies of hearing in vertebrates. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 289–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen EI, Konishi M (1978) Space and frequency are represented separately in the auditory midbrain of the owl. J Neurophysiol 41:870–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen EI, Konishi M (1979) Mechanisms of sound localization in the barn owl (Tyto alba). J Comp Physiol 133:13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen EI, Blasdel GG, Konishi M (1979) Sound localization by the barn owl (Tyto alba) measured with the search coil technique. J Comp Physiol 133:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi M (1973) Locatable and nonlocatable acoustic signals for barn owls. Am Nat 107:775–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühne R, Lewis B (1985) External and middle ears. In: King AS, McLelland J (eds) Form and function in birds, vol 3. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 227–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuwada S, Stanford TR, Batra R (1987) Interaural phase-sensitive units in the inferior colliculus of the unanesthetized rabbit: effects of changing frequency. J Neurophysiol 57:1338–1360

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis B (1983) Directional cues for auditory localisation. In: Lewis B (ed) Bioacoustics. Academic Press, London, pp 233–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Moiseff A (1989) Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl. J Comp Physiol A 164:637–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Moiseff A, Konishi M (1981) Neuronal and behavior sensitivity to binaural time difference in the owl. J Neurosci 1:40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Moiseff A, Konishi M (1983) Binaural characteristics of units in the barn owl's brainstem auditory pathway: Precursors of restricted spatial receptive fields. J Neurosci 3:2553–2562

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg RÅ (1978) Skull asymmetry, ear structure and function, and auditory localization in Tengmalm's owl,Aegolius funerus (L.). Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 282:325–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne RS (1971) Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba). J Exp Biol 54:535–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan WE, Konishi M (1984) Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl. J Neurosci 4:1787–1799

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T, Konishi M (1986) Selectivity for interaural time difference in the owl's midbrain. J Neurosci 6:3413–3422

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T, Moiseff A, Konishi M (1984) Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl. J Neurosci 4:1781–1786

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moiseff, A. Binaural disparity cues available to the barn owl for sound localization. J. Comp. Physiol. 164, 629–636 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00614505

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00614505

Keywords

Navigation