Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Amphetamine-induced disruptions of latent inhibition are reinforcer mediated: implications for animal models of schizophrenic attentional dysfunction

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Latent inhibition (LI) is a phenomenon observed when repeated, non-reinforced presentation of a stimulus results in a retardation of subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. Several recent experiments have suggested that LI is abolished in conditioned suppression paradigms following acute, low doses of amphetamine given during pre-exposure and conditioning. Experiment 1 sought to increase the generality of this finding in an appetitive LI paradigm, using a dose of amphetamine previously shown to disrupt the LI effect in an aversive paradigm (Killcross and Robbins 1993). However, no evidence for any disruption of LI was found. Experiment 2 extended this investigation to additional, higher doses ofd-amphetamine, and also examined the role of reinforcer magnitude in the effect. A non-significant trend towards an attenuated LI effect was found, which was reversed by decreases in the concentration of the sucrose reinforcer. Experiments 3 and 4 investigated the influence of systemic amphetamine in aversive paradigms, with specific attention to the increased response to the aversive footshock reinforcer found in amphetamine-treated animals. These experiments revealed that the influence of amphetamine on the LI effect in conditioned suppression paradigms could be reversed by reducing the intensity of footshock used in conditioning, thereby paralleling the effect found in the appetitive paradigm. Therefore it is unlikely that a simple attentional account of the abolition of the LI effect in previous experiments can be sustained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annau Z, Kamin LJ (1961) The conditioned emotional response as a function of the intensity of the US. J Comp Physiol Psychol 54[4]: 28–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker AG, Mackintosh NJ (1977) Excitatory and inhibitory conditioning following uncorrelated presentations of CS and UCS. Anim Learn Behav 5:315–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker AG, Mercier P (1982) Extinction of context and latent inhibition. Learn Motiv 13:391–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett RJ, Leith NJ, Ray OS (1972) Permanent facilitation of avoidance behaviour byd-amphetamine and scopolamine. Psychopharmacologia 25:321–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett RJ, Leith NJ, Ray OS (1973) A behavioural and pharmacological analysis of variables mediating active-avoidance behaviour in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 82:489–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch I, Hemsley D, Gray JA (1988) Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task. J Nerv Ment Dis 176:598–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi C, Marazzi-Uberti E (1969) Acquisition and retention of a conditioned avoidance response in mice as influenced by pemoline, by some of its derivatives and by some CNS stimulants. Psychopharmacologia 15:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell JE (1985) Psychopharmacology of centrally acting anorectic agents. In: Sandler M, Silverstone T (eds) Psychopharmacology and food. British Association for Psychopharmacology Monograph No. 7, Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouton ME (1991) Context retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning. In: Dachowski LW, Flaherty CF (eds) Current topics in animal learning: brain, emotion and cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 25–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouton ME, Rosengard C, Achenbach GG, Peck CA, Brooks DC (1993) Effects of contextual conditioning and unconditional stimulus presentation on performance in appetitive conditioning. Q J Exp Psychol 46B[1]: 63–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Christison GW, Atwater GE, Dunn LA, Kilts CD (1988) Haloperidol enhancement of latent inhibition — relation to therapeutic action. Biol Psychiatry 23[7]: 746–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D (1993) Context, cortex, and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychol Rev 99[1]:45–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn LA, Atwater GE, Kilts CD (1993) Effects of antipsychotic drugs on latent inhibition: sensitivity and specificity of an animal behavioural model of clinical drug action. Psychopharmacology 112:315–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista AM, Izquierdo I (1971) The effect of pre- and post-trial amphetamine injections on avoidance responses in rats. Psychopharmacologia 20:42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanselow MS (1980) Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing. Pavlov J Biol Sci 15:177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldon J, Weiner I (1991) The latent inhibition model of schizophrenic attention disorder: Haloperidol and sulpiride enhance rats ability to ignore irrelevant stimuli. Biol Psychiatry 29:635–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldon J, Shofel A, Weiner I (1991) Latent inhibition is unaffected by direct dopamine agonists. Pharm Biochem Behav 38:309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller I, Seifter J (1960) The effects of meprobamate, barbiturates,d-amphetamine, and promazine on experimentally induced conflict in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 1:482–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray JA, Feldon J, Rawlins JNP, Hemsley DR, Smith AD (1991) The neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Behav Brain Sci 14:1–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray NS, Pickering A, Hemsley DR, Dawling S, Gray JA (1992) Differential effects of a low and high dose of amphetamine on latent inhibition in human subjects: role of lateralised presentation of the stimuli. Psychopharmacology 107:425–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall G (1991) Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman GM (1983) A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine. J Exp Anal Behav 40:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph MH, Frith CD, Waddington JL (1979) Dopaminergic mechanisms and cognitive deficit in schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology 63:273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph MH, Peters SL, Gray JA (1993) Nicotine blocks latent inhibition in rats: evidence for a critical role of increased functional activity of dopamine in the mesolimbic system at conditioning rather than preexposure. Psychopharmacology 110:1–2, 187–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher RT, Morse WH (1968) Determinants of the specificity of behavioural effects of drugs. In: Reviews of physiology, biochemistry, and experimental pharmacology (vol. 60). Springer, Berlin, pp 1–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Killcross AS (1993) The underestimation of latent inhibition. Talk delivered at the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour Group, annual meeting. London, April, 1993

  • Killcross AS, Robbins TW (1993) Differential effects of intra-accumbens and systemic amphetamine on latent inhibition using an on-baseline, within-subject conditioned suppression paradigm. Psychopharmacology 110:479–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstandi M, Kafetzopoulos E (1993) Effects of striatal or accumbens lesions on the amphetamine-induced abolition of latent inhibition. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 44[4]: 751–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer PJ, Spear NE (1992) The effect of nonreinforced stimulus preexposure on the strength of a conditioned taste aversion as a function of retention interval: Do latent inhibition and extinction involve a shared process? Anim Learn Behav 20[1]: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer PJ, Christopher KR, Carbary TJ (1991) Release from latent inhibition with delayed testing. Anim Learn Behav 19[2]: 139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczenski R, Segal DS, Aizenstein ML (1991) Amphetamine, cocaine, and fencamfamine — relationship between locomotor and stereotypy response profiles and caudate and accumbens dopamine dynamics. J Neurosci 11[9]: 2703–2712

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni AS (1968) Facilitation of instrumental avoidance learning by amphetamine: an analysis. Psychopharmacologia 13:418–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R (1968) Psychoactive drugs, exploratory activity and fear. Nature 218:587–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubow RE (1973) Latent inhibition. Psychol Bull 79:398–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubow RE (1989) Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubow RE, Schnur P, Rifkin B (1976) Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. J Exp Psychol [Anim Behav Proc] 2:163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubow RE, Weiner I, Schlossberg A, Baruch I (1987) Latent inhibition and schizophrenia. Bull Psychon Soc 25:464–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh NJ (1975) A theory of attention: variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychol Rev 82:276–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh NJ (1983) Conditioning and associative learning. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaugh JL (1989) Involvement of hormonal and neuromodulatory systems in the regulation of memory storage. Annu Rev Neurosci 12:255–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller R, Wickens JR, Beninger RJ (1990) Dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in relation to reward and performance: a case for the D1 receptor as a primary site of therapeutic action of neuroleptic drugs. Prog Neurobiol 34:143–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison CF (1969) The effects of nicotine on punished behaviour. Psychopharmacologia 14:221–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard MG, White NM (1991) Dissociation of hippocampus and caudate nucleus memory systems by posttraining intracerebral injection of dopamine agonists. Behav Neurosci 105[2]: 295–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paré WP (1969) Age, sex, and strain differences in the aversive threshold to grid shock in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 69[2]: 214–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce JM, Hall G (1980) A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychol Rev 87:532–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters SL, Joseph MH (1993) Haloperidol potentiation of latent inhibition in rats: evidence for a critical role at conditioning rather than preexposure. Behav Pharmacol 4[2]: 183–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon PR, Crider A (1988) Towards an animal model of schizophrenia. In: Simon P, Soubrié P, Widlocher D (eds) An inquiry into schizophrenia and depression (animal models of psychiatric disorders, vol 2). Karger, Switzerland, pp 21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon PR, Staton DM (1982) Differential effects of microinjections ofd-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens or the caudate-putamen on the rat's ability to ignore an irrelevant stimulus. Biol Psychiatry 17:743–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon PR, Staton DM (1984) Microinjections ofd-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens or the caudate-putamen differentially affect stereotypy and locomotion in the rat. Physiol Psychol 12:159–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon PR, Crider A, Winkleman JW, Kam RM, Kapla LI (1981) Disrupted latent inhibition in the rat with chronic amphetamine or haloperidol-induced supersensitivity: relationship to schizophrenic attention disorder. Biol Psychiatry 16:519–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire LR (1986) Mechanisms of memory. Science 232:1612–1619

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein L (1964) Self-stimulation of the brain and the central stimulant action of amphetamine. Fed Proc 23:836–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner AR (1981) SOP: a model of automatic memory processing in animal behaviour. In: Spear NE, Miller RR (eds) Information processing in animals: memory mechanisms. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 5–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner I (1990) Neural substrates of latent inhibition: the switching model. Psychol Bull 108:442–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner I, Feldon J (1987) Facilitation of latent inhibition by haloperidol. Psychopharmacology 91:248–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner I, Lubow RE, Feldon J (1981) Chronic amphetamine and latent inhibition. Behav Brain Res 2:285–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner I, Lubow RE, Feldon J (1984) Abolition of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by chronic amphetamine in rats. Psychopharmacology 83:194–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner I, Feldon J, Katz J (1987a) Facilitation of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by haloperidol in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 26:241–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner I, Israeli-Telerant A, Feldon J (1987b) Latent inhibition is not affected by acute or chronic administration of 6 mg/kgdl-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 91:345–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner I, Lubow RE, Feldon J (1988) Disruption of latent inhibition by acute administration of low doses of amphetamine. Pharmac Biochem Behav 30:871–878

    Google Scholar 

  • White NM (1989) A functional hypothesis concerning the striatal matrix and patches: mediation of S-R memory and reward. Life Sci 45:1943–1957

    Google Scholar 

  • White NM, Milner PM (1992) The psychobiology of reinforcers. Annu Rev Psychol 43:443–471

    Google Scholar 

  • White NM, Viaud M (1991) Localized intracaudate dopamine D2 receptor activation during the post-training period improves memory for visual or olefactory conditioned emotional responses in rats. Behav Neural Biol 55:255–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson LS, Killcross AS, Humby T, Hall FS, Geyer MA, Robbins TW (1994) Social isolation in the rat produces developmentally specific deficits in pre-pulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response but does not disrupt latent inhibition. Neuropsychopharmacology 10[1]:61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles of experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaravics P, Setler PE (1979) Simultaneous rate-independent and rat-dependent assessment of intracranial self-stimulation: evidence for the direct involvement of dopamine in brain reinforcement mechanisms. Brain Res 169:499–512

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB, Cambridge, UK

    A. S. Killcross, A. Dickinson & T. W. Robbins

Authors
  1. A. S. Killcross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Dickinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. W. Robbins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Killcross, A.S., Dickinson, A. & Robbins, T.W. Amphetamine-induced disruptions of latent inhibition are reinforcer mediated: implications for animal models of schizophrenic attentional dysfunction. Psychopharmacology 115, 185–195 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244771

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244771

Key words

Search

Navigation