Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extending previous evidence for attentional shifts across auditory and visual modalities without the confound of the two modalities originating at different locations (Turatto et al. 2002), we investigated attention shifts between auditory and tactile modalities, and between tactile and visual modalities. Two stimuli (S1 and S2), either in the same or in different modalities, were delivered from the same spatial source and were separated by a variable temporal gap. S1 was task irrelevant, whereas S2 required a speeded discrimination. Results showed that modality switching is detrimental independently of the stimulated modality as long as the temporal lag between S1 and S2 is short enough that there is not time to switch attention before S2 is delivered. We observed automatic, modality-driven, attentional capture, with ipsimodal trials leading to faster response times than crossmodal trials. The present results cannot be accounted for by spatial artifacts, response priming or criterion shifts, and are interpreted as the consequence of a space-independent attentional shift across sensory modalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnell KM, Jolicoeur P (1999) The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: evidence for central processing limitation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:630–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman B (1988) The biology of behavior and mind. Wiley, Oxford

  • Caclin A, Soto-Faraco S, Kingstone A, Spence C (2002) Tactile “capture” of audition. Percept Psychophys 64:616–630

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark HH, Fox Tree J (2002) Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84:73–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta M, Miezen FM, Dobmeyer S, Shulman GL, Petersen SE (1991) Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. J Neurosci 11:2383–2402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Acqua R, Turatto M, Jolicoeur P (2001) Crossmodal attentional deficits in processing tactile stimulation. Percept Psychophys 63:777–789

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Driver J, Spence C (1994) Spatial synergies between auditory and visual attention. In: Umiltà C, Moscovitch M (eds) Attention and performance XV: conscious and nonconscious information processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 311–331

  • Driver J, Spence C (1998) Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends Cog Sci 7:254–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver J, Spence C (2000) Multisensory perception: beyond modularity and convergence. Curr Biol 10:R731–R735

    Google Scholar 

  • Eimer M, Schröger E (1998) ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. Psychophysiology 35:313–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Eimer M, Van Velzen J (2002) Crossmodal links in spatial attention are mediated by supramodal control processes: evidence from event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 39:437–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farah MJ, Wong AB, Monheit MA, Morrow LA (1989) Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: modality-specific or supramodal? Neuropsychologia 27:461–470

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey N (1980) Non-informative effects of stimuli functioning as cues. Q J Exp Psychol A 32:413–425

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston JC, McCann RS, Remington RW (1995) Chronometric evidence for two types of attention. Psychol Sci 6:365–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolicoeur P (1999) Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities. Psychon Bull Rev 6:87–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonides J (1981) Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In: Long JB, Baddeley AD (eds) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 187–203

  • Kawashima R, O’Sullivan BT, Roland PE (1995) Positron-emission tomography studies of cross-modality inhibition in selective attentional tasks: closing the “mind’s eye”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:5969–5972

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennett S, Eimer M, Spence C, Driver J (2001) Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs. J Cog Neurosci 13:462–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RM (1977) Attention and visual dominance: a chronometric analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 3:365–378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan GD (1980) Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: theory and data. Cognit Psychol 12:523–553

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald JJ, Ward LM (2000) Involuntary listening aids seeing: evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychol Sci 11:167–171

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller HJ, Rabbitt PMA (1989) Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:315–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler H (1994) Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull 116:19–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol A 32:3–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Petersen SE (1990) The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 13:25–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Nissen MJ, Klein RM (1976) Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychol Rev 83:157–171

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Snyder CRR, Davidson BJ (1980) Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:160–174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers RD, Monsell S (1995) Costs of predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 124:207–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt M, Postma A, de Haan E (2000) Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention. Q J Exp Psychol A 53:105–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence C (2001) Crossmodal attentional capture: a controversy resolved? In: Folk CL, Gibson BS (eds) Attraction, distraction, and action: multiple perspectives on attentional capture. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 231–262

  • Spence C (2002) Multisensory attention and tactile information processing. Behav Brain Res 135:57–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Driver J (1996) Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:1005–1030

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Driver J (1997a) Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Percept Psychophys 59:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Driver J (1997b) On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality. Percept Psychophys 59:384–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Driver J (2000) Attracting attention to the illusory location of a sound: reflexive crossmodal orienting and ventriloquism. Neuroreport 11:2057–2061

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Lloyd D, McGlone F, Nicholls MER, Driver J (2000a) Inhibition of return is supramodal: a demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition. Exp Brain Res 134:42–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Pavani F, Driver J (2000b) Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1298–1319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein BE, Wallace MT, Meredith MA (1995) Neural mechanisms mediating attention and orientation to multisensory cues. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The cognitive neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 683–702

  • Stein BE, London N, Wilkinson LK, Price DP (1996) Enhancement of perceived visual intensity by auditory stimuli: a psychophysical analysis. J Cog Neurosci 8:497–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassinari G, Berlucchi G (1995) Covert orienting to non-informative cues: reaction-time studies. Behav Brain Res 71:101–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tassinari G, Campara D (1996) Consequences of covert orienting to non-informative stimuli of different modalities: a unitary mechanism? Neuropsychologia 34:235–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turatto M, Benso F, Galfano G, Umiltà C (2002) Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:628–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Selst M, Jolicoeur P (1994) A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Q J Exp Psychol A 47:631–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward LM (1994) Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention. Can J Exp Psychol 48:242–259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward LM, McDonald JJ, Golestani N (1998) Crossmodal control of attention shifts. In: Wright RD (ed) Visual attention. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp 232–268

  • Ward LM, McDonald JJ, Lin D (2000) On asymmetries in crossmodal spatial attention orienting. Percept Psychophys 62:1258–1264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy

    Massimo Turatto & Giovanni Galfano

  2. University of California, Santa Cruz, USA

    Bruce Bridgeman

  3. University of Padova, Padova, Italy

    Carlo Umiltà

  4. Department of Cognitive Science and Education, University of Trento, Via Matteo del Ben 5, 38068, Rovereto, Italy

    Massimo Turatto

Authors
  1. Massimo Turatto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giovanni Galfano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bruce Bridgeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carlo Umiltà
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Turatto.

Additional information

The research was supported by grants from CNR and MURST to C.U.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turatto, M., Galfano, G., Bridgeman, B. et al. Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems. Exp Brain Res 155, 301–310 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1724-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1724-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation