Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inhibition in Autism: Children with Autism have Difficulty Inhibiting Irrelevant Distractors but not Prepotent Responses

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Resistance to distractor inhibition tasks have previously revealed impairments in children with autism. However, on the classic Stroop task and other prepotent response tasks, children with autism show intact inhibition. These data may reflect a distinction between prepotent response and resistance to distractor inhibition. The current study investigated this possibility using tasks that systematically manipulated inhibitory load. Findings showed that children with autism performed comparably to typically developing and learning disabled controls on a prepotent response inhibition stop-signal task but showed significant inhibitory impairment on a modified flanker resistence to distractor inhibition task. Although the results are clearly consistent with the suggestion that autism is associated with a specific deficit in resistance to distractor inhibition, they may in fact be related to an increased perceptual capacity in autism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, N. C., & Jarrold, C. (2009). Inhibition and the validity of the Stroop task for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1112–1121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C. S., & Jarrold, C. (2007). The problem with using eye-gaze to infer desire: A deficit of cue inference in children with autism spectrum disorder? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1761–1775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M., & Norbury, C. F. (2005). Executive functions in children with communication impairments, in relation to autistic symptomotology. Autism, 9, 7–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. F., Fitzgerald, P., & Parkes, K. R. (1982). The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, S. E. (1983). Interference effects in autistic children: Evidence for the comprehension of single stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 250–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, S. A., Ochsner, K. N., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2001). Prefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and out of mind. Brain, 124, 2074–2086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burack, J. A. (1994). Selective attention deficits in persons with autism: Preliminary evidence of an inefficient attentional lens. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 535–543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, S. E., Holt, D. D., White, D. A., & Green, L. (2007). Inhibitory control in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1155–1165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, S. E., Kester, L. E., Bodner, K., & Miles, J. H. (in press). Evidence for selective inhibitory impairment in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychology.

  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 19, 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Zubicaray, G. I., Andrew, C., Zelaya, F. O., Williams, S. C. R., & Dumanoir, C. (2000). Motor response suppression and the prepotent tendency to respond: A parametric fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1280–1291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, F. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12, 45–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, F. N. (1993). Resistance to interference: Developmental changes in a basic processing dimension. In M. L. Howe & R. Pasnak (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development. Vol. 1: Foundations (pp. 3–27). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a non search task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskes, G., Bryson, S., & McCormick, T. (1990). Comprehension of concrete and abstract words in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 61–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., & Stein, E. A. (1999). Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: An event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 8301–8306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garon, N., Bryson, S., & Smith, I. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 31–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, H., Luman, M., & van Meel, C. S. (2008). What’s in a game: The effect of social motivation on interference control in boys with ADHD and autism spectrum disorders. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 848–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, H., Verté, S., Oosterlaan, J., Roeyers, H., & Sergeant, J. (2004). How specific are executive functioning deficits in attention deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 836–845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, M. C., Mostofsky, S. H., Cutting, L. E., Mahone, E. M., Astor, B. C., Denckla, M. B., et al. (2005). Subtle executive impairment in children with autism and ADHD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 279–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, E., Pennington, B., Wehner, E., & Rogers, S. (1999). Executive function in young children in autism. Child Development, 70, 817–832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harnishfeger, K. K. (1995). The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 175–204). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, H., Schwartz, C., Mundy, P., Burnette, C., Sutton, S., Zahka, N., et al. (2006). Response monitoring, the error-related negativity, and differences in social behavior in autism. Brain and Cognition, 61, 96–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. L. (2004). Evaluating the theory of executive dysfunction in autism. Developmental Review, 24, 189–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iarocci, G., & Burack, J. (2004). Intact covert orienting to peripheral cues among children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 257–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, K., Madden, A. K., Brahman, J., & Russell, A. J. (2011). Response inhibition in adults with autism spectrum disorder compared to attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 903–912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, R. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2004). The relationship of theory of mind and executive functions to symptom type and severity in children with autism. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 137–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keehn, B., Lincoln, A. J., Müller, R.-A., & Townsend, J. (2010). Attentional networks in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 1251–1259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N., Lin, Z., Zokaei, N., & Thoma, V. (2009). The role of perceptual load in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1346–1358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, B. R., Lincoln, A. J., Ozonoff, S., & Lai, Z. (2005). Examining the relationship between executive functions and restricted, repetitive symptoms of autistic disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 445–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minshew, N., Luna, B., & Sweeney, J. (1999). Oculomotor evidence for neocortical systems but no cerebellar dysfunction in autism. Neurology, 52, 917–922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 220–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozonoff, S., & Jensen, J. (1999). Brief report: Specific executive function profiles in three neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 171–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozonoff, S., & Strayer, D. L. (1997). Inhibitory function in nonretarded children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27, 59–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozonoff, S., Strayer, D. L., McMahon, W. M., & Filloux, F. (1994). Executive function abilities in autism and Tourette syndrome: An information-processing approach. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1015–1032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plaisted, K., O’Riordan, M., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1998). Enhanced discrimination of novel, highly similar stimuli by adults with autism during a perceptual learning task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 765–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1990). Coloured progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, A., Swettenham, J., Campbell, R., & Coleman, M. (2009). Selective attention and perceptual load in autism spectrum disorder. Psychological Science, 20, 1388–1393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J., Jarrold, C., & Hood, B. (1999). Two intact executive capacities in children with autism: Implications for the core executive dysfunctions in the disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 103–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Bailey, A., & Lord, C. (2003). The social communication questionnaire. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl, F., Podreka, I., & Deecke, L. (1994). Anterior frontal cortex and the effect of proactive interference in word pair learning: Results of Brain- SPECT. Neuropsychologia, 32, 241–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M., & Zanakos, S. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62, 615–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Box 870348, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA

    Nena C. Adams

  2. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Brsitol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK

    Christopher Jarrold

Authors
  1. Nena C. Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher Jarrold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nena C. Adams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, N.C., Jarrold, C. Inhibition in Autism: Children with Autism have Difficulty Inhibiting Irrelevant Distractors but not Prepotent Responses. J Autism Dev Disord 42, 1052–1063 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1345-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1345-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation