The echolocation of flying insects by bats
Abstract
- 1.
1. Bats of the genus Myotis (M. lucifugus, M. subulatus leibii and M. keenii septentrionalis) have been studied while pursuing and capturing small insects under laboratory conditions. It is apparently important to provide fairly large numbers of such insects in order to elicit insect catching behaviour indoors.
- 2.
2. Insect catches are individually directed pursuit manoeuvres; each insect is detected, located, and intercepted in flight within about half a second.
- 3.
3. Certain individual bats caught mosquitos (Culex quinquefaciatus) and fruit flies (Drosophila robusta and D. melanogaster) at remarkably high rates which could be measured conservatively by the gain in weight of the bat. Sometimes a bat would average as many as 10 mosquitos or 14 fruit flies per minute during a period of several minutes. In four cases motion pictures showed two separate Drosophila catches within half a second.
- 4.
4. The orientation sounds of the hunting bat are adjusted in a manner that seems appropriate for the echolocation of single insects one at a time. There is a search phase before the occurrence of any apparent reaction to the insect. In this phase the frequency drops from about 100 to 50 kilocycles during each pulse of sound, and the pulses are emitted by M. lucifugus at intervals of 50 to 100 milliseconds.
- 5.
5. When an insect is detected the search phase gives way to an approach phase characterized by a progressive shortening of the pulse-to-pulse interval and, if necessary, a sharp turn towards the insect. In this phase the pulse duration may shorten somewhat, but the frequencies remain approximately the same as in the search phase or drop slightly.
- 6.
6. When the bat is within a few centimetres of the insect there is a terminal phase in which the pulse duration and interval between pulses shorten to about 0·5 millisecond and 5 or 6 milliseconds respectively. Contrary to a conclusion reached earlier on the basis of much less adequate data (Griffin, 1953), the frequency drops in the terminal phase, sometimes to 25 or 30 kilocycles. This is the buzz, which also occurs in many cases when the bat is dodging wires or landing.
- 7.
7. The distance from the insect at which detection occurs can be judged by the shift from search to approach patterns. This distance of detection is commonly about 50 cm. for Drosophila, and it occasionally may be as much as a metre with fruit flies or mosquitos.
- 8.
8. Two M. lucifugus which had become adept at catching Drosophila in the laboratory were exposed to broad band thermal noise either at low frequencies (0·1–15 kilocycles) or high (20–100 kilocycles). The low frequency noise had an approximately uniform spectrum level of about 50 decibels per cycle band width (re 0·0002 dyne/cm2) from 0·1 to 8 kilocycles. It was thus very loud compared to the flight sounds of Drosophila which have a fundamental frequency of a few hundred cycles/second and a maximum sound pressure level of 20–25 decibels at the distances of detection by these bats. The high frequency noise was of low and varying intensity, but it discouraged or prevented insect catching. The low frequency noise, on the other hand, had no effect on insect catching; the bats gained weight in this noise (and in the dark) just as rapidly as in the quiet. Although bats sometimes detect insect prey by passive listening to sounds emanating from the insects themselves, these experiments appear to us to establish conclusively that small and relatively silent insects are often detected by echolocation.
References (14)
- E. Gould
The feeding efficiency of insectivorous bats
J. Mammal
(1955) - E. Gould
Further studies on the feeding efficiency of bats
J. Mammal
(1959) - D.R. Griffin
Bat sounds under natural conditions with evidence for the echolocation of insect prey
J. exp. Zool
(1953) - D.R. Griffin
- D.R. Griffin et al.
Ability of bats to discriminate echoes from louder noise
Science
(1958) - A.D. Grinnell et al.
The sensitivity of echolocation in bats
Biol. Bull
(1958)
Cited by (456)
Peale's dolphins (Lagenorhynchus australis) are acoustic mergers between dolphins and porpoises
2024, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and EcologyMost dolphin species produce broadband clicks for echolocation (i.e., biosonar pulses), and whistles and burst-pulsed calls for communication purposes. A few dolphin species in the southern hemisphere are reported to only produce clicks of a more narrowband high-frequency (NBHF) type, very similar to the clicks produced by porpoises. Here, we use underwater acoustic recordings of Peale's dolphins (Lagenorhynchus australis) in the Falkland Islands to show that they also can produce broadband clicks and tonal whistle sounds similar to other whistling odontocete species in addition to NBHF clicks. Whistles and broadband clicks co-occurred in seven out of twelve acoustic encounters with Peale's dolphins. The co-occurrence of whistles and broadband signals, which were predominately burst-pulses, produced by Peale's dolphins in this study points to a probable function as communication signals. Furthermore, the measured frequency and time parameters of Peale's dolphin whistles were comparable with whistles recorded from four additional species in the Lagenorhynchus genus in various parts of their ranges. This is the only species of Lagenorhynchus recorded to date that can relax acoustic crypsis in a similar manner as Heaviside's (Cephalorhynchus heavisidii), Commerson's (C. commersonii), and Hector's (C. hectori) dolphins. Our findings make it likely that additional NBHF species have the ability to generate both pulsed signal types and whistles, and further challenges the acoustic classification of NBHF species.
Global protein-protein interaction networks in yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae and helicobacter pylori
2023, TalantaUnderstanding many biological processes relies heavily on accurately predicting protein-protein interactions (PPIs). In this study, we propose a novel method for predicting PPIs that is based on LogitBoost with a binary bat feature selection algorithm. Our approach involves the extraction of an initial feature vector by combining pseudo amino acid composition (PseAAC), pseudo-position-specific scoring matrix (PsePSSM), reduced sequence and index-vectors (RSIV), and autocorrelation descriptor (AD). Subsequently, a binary bat algorithm is applied to eliminate redundant features, and the resulting optimal features are fed into the LogitBoost classifier for the identification of PPIs. To evaluate the proposed method, we test it on two databases, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Helicobacter pylori, using 10-fold cross-validation, and achieve accuracies of 94.39% and 97.89%, respectively. Our results showcase the significant potential of our pipeline in accurately predicting protein-protein interactions (PPIs), thereby offering a valuable resource to the scientific research community.
Implementing prescribed-time convergent control: sampling and robustness
2023, IFAC-PapersOnLineAccording to recent results, convergence in a prespecified or prescribed finite time can be achieved under extreme model uncertainty if control is applied continuously over time. This paper shows that this extreme amount of uncertainty cannot be tolerated under sampling, not even if sampling could become infinitely frequent as the deadline is approached, unless the sampling strategy were designed according to the growth of the control action. Robustness under model uncertainty is analyzed and the amount of uncertainty that can be tolerated under sampling is quantified in order to formulate the least restrictive prescribed-time control problem that is practically implementable. Some solutions to this problem are given for a scalar system. Moreover, either under a-priori knowledge of bounds for initial conditions, or if the strategy can be selected after the first measurement becomes available, it is shown that the real, practically achievable objectives can also be reached with linear time-invariant control and uniform sampling. These derivations serve to yield insight into the real advantages that implementation of prescribed-time controllers may have.
Sensory systems used by echolocating bats foraging in natural settings
2023, A Natural History of Bat Foraging: Evolution, Physiology, Ecology, Behavior, and ConservationIn the natural world, foraging bats exploit a rich array of sensory cues. Bats have evolved sensory systems that allow them access to diverse food sources in a wide range of environments, from tropical to temperate and desert to mountain. These systems include echolocation, passive listening, vision, olfaction, thermoreception, and mechanosensation, which collectively enable foraging success. Some species benefit from multimodal information carried by different sensory systems to localize and identify food sources, particularly when acoustic clutter and background noise interfere with stimulus detection and discrimination. Here, we present an overview of the sensory information bats exploit to locate food such as insects, fruit, nectar and pollen, small vertebrates, and blood.
The influence of forest management practices on seasonal bat species occurrence and activity at the Kisatchie National Forest in Louisiana, USA
2022, Forest Ecology and ManagementIn the southeastern United States, where forests are the primary land cover type, understanding how forest stand characteristics and forest management practices influence bat distributions is critical for bat conservation and management. We deployed passive acoustic monitors to record bat calls at sites representing six forest types at the Kisatchie National Forest in central Louisiana during two winter (January–February 2020 and December 2020–February 2021) and two summer (June–August 2020 and 2021) periods. We also collected environmental data at the landscape and local scales to help explain patterns in bat species occurrence. We detected big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus), eastern red/Seminole bats (Lasiurus borealis/L. seminolus), Myotis species, tricolored bats (Perimyotis subflavus), Mexican free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis), and hoary bats (Aeorestes cinereus) during both periods, and additionally detected evening bats (Nycticeius humeralis) during the summer. We observed seasonal differences in habitat use, and found that three bat species were more active during the summer in pine forests with group selection harvest, pine forests managed for red-cockaded woodpeckers (Leuconotopicus borealis), and pine forests that were clearcut within five years of our study when compared to unmanaged pine forests, thinned pine forests, and bottomland hardwood forests. Contrary to other studies, we found that the predicted probability of occupancy decreased with increasing proximity to riparian areas for four bat species, which could reflect the complex understory vegetation conditions that we observed along the riparian corridors in our study area. Our research identified forest characteristics and management practices that promote bat species diversity and activity in central Louisiana and demonstrated that pine forests with open understories and small openings in the canopy provide important foraging habitat for bats that occur in our study area and possibly other regions in the southeast.
Perceptual hearing sensitivity during vocal production
2022, iScienceVocalization, such as speaking, inevitably generates sensory feedback that can cause self-generated masking. However, perceptual hearing sensitivity during vocal production is poorly understood. Using an adaptive psychophysical method, we measured the perceptual hearing sensitivity of an echolocating bat, Hipposideros pratti, in a passive listening (PL) task to detect pure tones, an active listening (AL) task to detect pure tones triggered by its vocalization, and a phantom echo task. We found that hanging H. pratti had the best hearing sensitivity of approximately 0 dB sound pressure level (SPL) in the PL task but much lower hearing sensitivity (nearly 40 dB worse) in the echo task. In the AL task, all bats gradually increased call frequency by 0.8–1.1 kHz, which improved their hearing sensitivity by 25–29 dB. This study underscores the need for studying the sensory capability of subjects engaged in active behaviors.