Inputs to trigeminal brain stem neurones from facial, oral, tooth pulp and pharyngolaryngeal tissues: I. responses to innocuous and noxious stimuli

doi:10.1016/0006-8993(76)90731-9

Brain Research

Volume 117, Issue 2, 26 November 1976, Pages 211-226

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(76)90731-9 Get rights and content

Abstract

Responses evoked in anaesthetized or decerebrate cats by stimulation of efferents supplying the face, mouth, pharynx, larnyx, tooth pulp and jaw muscles were recorded from single neurones located in the trigeminal (V) main sensory nucleus, V nucleus oralis, and adjacent regions. Many cells (both V-thalamic relay and non-relay) with localized V mechanoreceptive cutaneous fields could be activated by stimulation of a number of these afferents. A particularly prominent short-latency (often monosynaptic) input was noted from the canine tooth pulp, stimulation of which is generally considered to elicit only responses of pain in man. Control experiments showed that pulp-evoked responses were not the result of stimulus spread to tissues outside the pulp. The interaction of these various inputs to neurones at this level of the V brain stem complex typically resulted in a prolonged period of inhibition that was sometimes preceded by a short-lasting facilitatory phase. This inhibitory effect was also apparent in neurones located outside the complex, although a late facilitatory phase was frequently also noted. Our findings indicate a significant nociceptive input to V main sensory-oralis neurones, a proportion of which relay directly to the ventrobasal thalamus. The interactions described may be involved in perceptual and reflex aspects of responses to noxious and innocuous V stimuli.

Reference (32)

AnderssonS.A. et al.
Electroacupuncture. Effect on pain threshold measured with electrical stimulation of teeth
Brain Research
(1973)
Darian-SmithI.
Neural mechanisms of facial sensation
Int. Rev. Neurobiol.
(1966)
DubnerR. et al.
Presynaptic excitability changes of primary afferent and corticofugal fibers projecting to trigeminal brain stem nuclei
Exp. Neurol.
(1971)
FieldsR.W. et al.
The origin of trigeminal response components elicited by electrical stimulation of the tooth pulp of the cat
Arch. oral. Biol.
(1975)
GreenwoodF.
An electrophysiological study of the central connections of primary afferent nerve fibres from the dental pulp in the cat
Arch. oral Biol.
(1973)
GreenwoodF. et al.
Electrophysiological evidence on the type of nerve fibres excited by electrical stimulation of teeth with a pulp tester
Arch. oral Biol.
(1972)
GreenwoodL.F. et al.
Inputs to trigeminal brain stem neurones from facial, oral, tooth pulp and pharyngolaryngeal tissues: II. Role of trigeminal nucleus caudalis in modulating responses to innocuous and noxious stimuli
Brain Research
(1976)
HancockM.B. et al.
Convergence of visceral and cutaneous input onto spinothalamic tract cells in the thoracic spinal cord of the cat
Exp. Neurol.
(1975)
KhayyatG.F. et al.
Response patterns to noxious and non-noxious stimuli in rostral trigeminal relay nuclei
Brain Research
(1975)
LundJ.P. et al.
Oral-facial and jaw muscle afferent projections to neurons in cat frontal cortex
Exp. Neurol.
(1974)

NordS.G. et al.

Projection of tooth pulp afferents to the cat trigeminal nucleus caudalis

Brain Research

(1975)

RoweM.J. et al.

Responses of trigeminal ganglion and brain stem neurones in the cat to mechanical and thermal stimulation of the face

Brain Research

(1972)

SessleB.J.

Excitatory and inhibitory inputs to single neurones in the solitary tract nucleus and adjacent reticular formation

Brain Research

(1973)

YokotaT.

Excitation of units in marginal rim of trigeminal subnucleus caudalis elicited by tooth pulp stimulation

Brain Research

(1975)

AndersonD.J. et al.

Sensory mechanisms in mammalian teeth and their supporting structures

Physiol. Rev.

(1970)

DaviesW.I.R. et al.

Depolarization of the tooth pulp afferent terminals in the brain stem of the cat

J. Physiol. (Lond.)

(1971)

Cited by (176)

Review of visceral throat and chest disorders causing nonodontogenic orofacial pain
2022, Journal of the American Dental Association
The purpose of this narrative review was to show that referred orofacial pain can be the chief symptom or a prominent symptom of visceral diseases of the chest and throat, with implications for dental and medical practice.
A search of PubMed was performed to identify dentally relevant clinical case reports and case series using the following terms: jaw pain, orofacial pain, toothache, temporomandibular disorders, otalgia, neuralgia, and neuropathic pain crossed with angina, myocardial infarction, carotid artery, esophagus, mediastinum, thyroid, heart, pericardium, aorta, lung, thymus gland, and stomach.
Numerous acute, visceral disorders of the throat and chest have been reported to produce pain in the orofacial region, which may be difficult to distinguish from dental-related diseases on the basis of symptoms alone. Chest organs and structures reported to cause such pain include the heart, aorta, esophagus, stomach, lungs, and mediastinum. Throat organs and structures reported to cause pain in the orofacial region include the thyroid gland, carotid arteries, and vagus and glossopharyngeal nerves. Coronary artery diseases, aortic and carotid dissection, mediastinal tumors, subacute thyroiditis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease have a predilection for referring pain orofacially.
Misdiagnosis of referred visceral orofacial pain can lead to delayed diagnosis and unnecessary treatment. Dentists can play a key role in the management of these conditions by means of ruling out odontogenic facial pain, promptly referring patients to medical specialists, and educating patients. Future research is needed to determine the incidence and mechanism of orofacial pain in these disorders. Visceral pain referred to the orofacial region may not be as rare a phenomenon as is sometimes assumed.
Altered Brainstem Pain Modulating Circuitry Functional Connectivity in Chronic Painful Temporomandibular Disorder
2021, Journal of Pain
Citation Excerpt :
Interestingly, we found FC alterations were restricted to the rostral portion of SpV in the oralis division. This was surprising, given that the SpVo is typically associated with nociceptive processing in oral and perioral regions,55,56 and that it has previously been shown that TMD subjects show anatomical changes and increases in ongoing blood flow in the caudalis region of SpV.66,68 Whilst we do not know why these local differences occur, it has been shown that the SpV caudalis can modulate orofacial sensory information via projections to the SpV oralis,20 and a large proportion of primary afferent nerve fibres from the temporomandibular joint itself terminate in the SpVo.11
There is evidence from preclinical models of chronic pain and human psychophysical investigations to suggest that alterations in endogenous brainstem pain-modulation circuit functioning are critical for the initiation and/or maintenance of pain. Whilst preclinical models have begun to explore the functioning of this circuitry in chronic pain, little is known about such functioning in humans with chronic pain. The aim of this investigation was to determine whether individuals with chronic non-neuropathic pain, painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD), display alterations in brainstem pain-modulating circuits. Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging, we performed static and dynamic functional connectivity (FC) analyses to assess ongoing circuit function in 16 TMD and 45 control subjects. We calculated static FC as the correlation of functional magnetic resonance imaging signals between regions over the entire scan and dynamic FC as the correlation of signals in short (50s) windows. Compared with controls, TMD subjects showed significantly greater (static) FC between the rostral ventromedial medulla and both the subnucleus reticularis dorsalis and the region that receives orofacial nociceptive afferents, the spinal trigeminal nucleus. No differences were found in other brainstem pain-modulating regions such as the midbrain periaqueductal gray matter and locus coeruleus. We also identified that TMD subjects experience greater variability in the dynamic functional connections between the rostral ventromedial medulla and both the subnucleus reticularis dorsalis and spinal trigeminal nucleus. These changes may underlie enhanced descending pain-facilitating actions over the region that receives nociceptive afferents, ultimately leading to enhanced nociceptive transmission to higher brain regions and thus contributing to the ongoing perception of pain.
Psychophysical studies suggest that brainstem pain-modulation circuits contribute to the maintenance of chronic pain. We report that individuals with painful TMD display altered static and dynamic FC within the brainstem pain-modulation network. Modifying this circuitry may alter an individual's ongoing pain.
5.31 - Dental Pain Mechanisms
2020, The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference: Volume 1-7, Second Edition
Insights into the etiology and pathogienesis of toothaches have been gained through research into the mechanisms underlying dental pain and have informed clinical practice for diagnosing and applying effective and evidence-based therapeutic procedures for controlling dental pain. This chapter will focus on these mechanisms involved in dental pain and its control, and also outline their clinical significance and identify current gaps in knowledge that require further research.
3.20 - Oral Chemesthesis and Taste
2020, The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference: Volume 1-7, Second Edition
Chemesthesis is defined as the sensitivity of mucosal surfaces to environmental chemicals. Activation of this system elicits thermal, nociceptive, and tactile sensations. In the oral cavity, mucosal surfaces respond to compounds found commonly in foods and the evoked sensations contribute to the overall flavor percept. Presently, the transduction and coding mechanisms underpinning many of the psychophysical observations made in humans are described. Similarly, interactions between oral chemesthesis and taste pathways have been investigated. These events occur both peripherally and centrally and provide the basis for the reciprocal modulatory activity observed perceptually between these systems.
Somatosensory changes in orthodontics—findings from quantitative sensory testing (QST) studies
2018, Seminars in Orthodontics
Citation Excerpt :
These results support the occurrence of neuroplastic changes in the central and peripheral nervous system as a result of the periodontalnoxious stimuli.37 One possible hypothesis for this finding is that the peripheral inflammatory condition, due to the separator wearing, stimulates the discharge of wide dynamic range and nociceptive specific neurons in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis.39 PPTs were also measured in subjects with a history of orthodontic treatment, who ended the therapy about 5years before the study.
Several orthodontic procedures induce pain at some degree during the treatment. Even though orthodontic pain has been extensively studied from the clinical perspective, the spreading of standardized somatosensory examination of the oro-facial structures opens a window on the knowledge of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying such pain. This article provides an overview on the chairside and comprehensive intraoral somatosensory testing, and summarizes the current findings on the somatosensory changes in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients. Signs of sensitization have been reported both during orthodontic treatment and after orthodontic-surgical treatment; therefore, clinicians should be aware of the available psychophysical methods to adequately assess the oro-facial somatosensory functions.
Circuits in the rodent brainstem that control whisking in concert with other orofacial motor actions
2018, Neuroscience
The world view of rodents is largely determined by sensation on two length scales. One is within the animal’s peri-personal space; sensorimotor control on this scale involves active movements of the nose, tongue, head, and vibrissa, along with sniffing to determine olfactory clues. The second scale involves the detection of more distant space through vision and audition; these detection processes also impact repositioning of the head, eyes, and ears. Here we focus on orofacial motor actions, primarily vibrissa-based touch but including nose twitching, head bobbing, and licking, that control sensation at short, peri-personal distances. The orofacial nuclei for control of the motor plants, as well as primary and secondary sensory nuclei associated with these motor actions, lie within the hindbrain. The current data support three themes: First, the position of the sensors is determined by the summation of two drive signals, i.e., a fast rhythmic component and an evolving orienting component. Second, the rhythmic component is coordinated across all orofacial motor actions and is phase-locked to sniffing as the animal explores. Reverse engineering reveals that the preBötzinger inspiratory complex provides the reset to the relevant premotor oscillators. Third, direct feedback from somatosensory trigeminal nuclei can rapidly alter motion of the sensors. This feedback is disynaptic and can be tuned by high-level inputs. A holistic model for the coordination of orofacial motor actions into behaviors will encompass feedback pathways through the midbrain and forebrain, as well as hindbrain areas.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Inputs to trigeminal brain stem neurones from facial, oral, tooth pulp and pharyngolaryngeal tissues: I. responses to innocuous and noxious stimuli

Abstract

Brain Research

Int. Rev. Neurobiol.

Exp. Neurol.

Arch. oral. Biol.

Arch. oral Biol.

Arch. oral Biol.

Brain Research

Exp. Neurol.

Brain Research

Exp. Neurol.

Brain Research

Brain Research

Brain Research

Brain Research

Sensory mechanisms in mammalian teeth and their supporting structures

Physiol. Rev.

Depolarization of the tooth pulp afferent terminals in the brain stem of the cat

J. Physiol. (Lond.)