Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 178, Issues 2–3, 14 December 1979, Pages 251-274
Brain Research

Morphological characterization of slow and fast pyramidal tract cells in the cat

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(79)90693-0Get rights and content

Abstract

In adult cats the morphology of slow and fast pyramidal tract (Pt) neurons was studied following intracellular HRP injections and Golgi impregnation. Both types of neurons are pyramidal cells and their soma are all located in the fifth layer of the motor area. As a rule, fast Pt neurons have larger somata and their basal and apical dendrites occupy a larger territory in the tangential plane. In layer I, terminal apical dendrites of fast Pt neurons are smooth and divide poorly while those of slow Pt neurons bear a moderate amount of spines and branch profusely. Midway between the pia and layer V, in the third layer, the apical shafts of both types of Pt cells run upward with little branching. These shafts are more numerous in fast Pt cells (7 to 16) and they are almost devoid of spines. Those of slow Pt cells in layer III number between 5 and 9 and are densely covered with spines. Oblique and horizontal branches of slow and fast Pt neurons extend in layer V and some of them invade the lower part of layer III. It is suggested that this zone corresponds to a true fourth layer in the motor area. In both types of cells oblique and lateral branches bear numerous spines. Within the basal dendritic territory of Pt cells, one has to distinguish two dendritic systems: a short and a long one. The former spreads downward obliquely and appears to remain within layer V. The latter is made up of long descending vertical (antiapical) and oblique dendrites (tap root). While both types of cells may have long antiapical dendrites that run down radially to the lower part of the VI, tap root dendrites which expand laterally below the cell body for considerable distances are a distinctive feature of fast Pt neurons. Though basal dendrites of all Pt cells bear spines, their number, distribution and shape are very variable in fast Pt cells.

Reference (54)

  • AdamsJ.C.

    Technical considerations on the use of horseradish peroxidase as a neuronal marker

    Neuroscience

    (1977)
  • AsanumaH. et al.

    Unitary study on evoked activity of callosal neurons and its effect on pyramidal tract cell activity on cats

    Jap. J. Physiol.

    (1959)
  • BerrovoetsC.E. et al.

    Pericruciate cortical neurons projecting to the brainstem reticular formation dorsal column nuclei and spinal cord in the cat

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1975)
  • BoninG. von

    Architecture of the precentral motor cortex and some adjacent areas

  • BraitenbergV. et al.

    Morphological observations on the cerebellar cortex

    J. comp. Neurol.

    (1958)
  • BrodmannK.

    Beitra¨ge zur histologischen lokalisation der Grosshirnrinde. Dritte Mittelung: Die Rinderfelder der niederen Affen

    J. Psychol. Neurol. (Lpz.)

    (1905)
  • ColonnierM.

    The tangetial organization of the visual cortex

    J. Anat. (Lond.)

    (1964)
  • ColonnierM. et al.

    An anterograde degeneration study of the tangential spread of axons in cortical areas 17 and 18 of the squirrel monkey(Saimiri scieureus)

    J. comp. neurol.

    (1978)
  • ConelJ.L.

    Postnatal Development of the Human Cerebral Cortex

    (1939)
  • CreutzfeldtO.D. et al.

    Zur Unterscheidung von ‘Spezifichen’ und ‘unspezifichen’ Synapsen an corticalen Nervenzellen

    Naturwissenschaften

    (1964)
  • CreutzfeldtO.D. et al.

    Electrophysiology of cortical nerve cells

  • CullheimS. et al.

    A morphological study of the axons and recurrent collaterals of cat sciatic α-motoneurones after intracellular staining with horseradish peroxidase

    J. comp. Neurol.

    (1967)
  • DiamondJ. et al.

    The function of the dendritic spine: an hypothesis

  • EvartsE.V.

    Relation of discharge frequency to conduction velocity in pyramidal tract neurons

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1965)
  • FleischauerK.

    Cortical architectonics: the last 50 years and some problems of today

  • FoxC.A. et al.

    A quantitative study of the Purkinje cell dendritic brachlets and their relationship to afferent fibers

    J. Anat. (Lond.)

    (1957)
  • GatterK.C. et al.

    The intrinsic connections of the cortex of area 4 of the monkey

    Brain

    (1978)
  • Cited by (103)

    • Sparse reconstruction of brain circuits: Or, how to survive without a microscopic connectome

      2013, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      The local axon of a “thick tufted” neuron arborizes mostly in the infragranular layers, where it spreads laterally, but it can also send a few collaterals to the superficial layers. Depending on the cortical area, the “thick tufted” pyramidal neuron output to the superior colliculus, trigeminal nuclei, spinal cord, thalamus, striatum, pons and red nucleus (Brown and Hestrin, 2009; Deschenes et al., 1979; Gabbott et al., 1987; Hamada et al., 1981; Hattox and Nelson, 2007; Hubener and Bolz, 1988; Hubener et al., 1990; Jones, 1984; Kasper et al., 1994; Landry et al., 1980; Larsen et al., 2007; Morishima and Kawaguchi, 2006; Ojima et al., 1992). The second type of layer 5 pyramidal cell is the “slender tufted” or “tall simple”, which has a slender apical dendrite that may, but not always, reach as high as layer one, but does not form a parasol-like tuft.

    • Two-photon imaging and the activation of cortical neurons

      2013, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, since two-photon imaging is restricted to the superficial portion of cortex (i.e. between 0 and 500 μm below the cortical surface) little can be said about how neurons in deeper portions of cortex, such as lamina V, behave during the evocation of electrically elicited responses. It has become very clear in recent years (but known for a long time) that most responses evoked electrically from the neocortex are generated primarily by the largest pyramidal elements exiting from the deepest layers and projecting subcortically (Phillips, 1956; Rutledge and Doty, 1962; Takahashi, 1965; Stoney et al., 1968; Calvin and Sypert, 1976; Finlay et al., 1976; Deschenes et al., 1979; Macpherson et al., 1982; Swadlow, 1985, 1988; Nowak and Bullier, 1996; Tehovnik et al., 2005, 2006, 2009; Logothetis et al., 2010; Koivuniemi et al., 2011). Also it is well established that most neuronal traffic in the cortex occurs mainly along the vertical dimensions of a cortical column (Lund et al., 1975; Fitzpatrick et al., 1985; Peters and Sethares, 1991, 1996; Peters, 1994) and less so along the horizontal dimension, largely because horizontal traffic is curtailed by poor responsivity due to low myelination and sluggish synapses (Raymond and Lettvin, 1978; Swadlow, 1985; Grinvald et al., 1994; Nowak and Bullier, 1996; Slovin et al., 2002).

    • A method to measure the distribution of latencies of motor evoked potentials in man

      2011, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      With the above reasoning, we assume that varying conduction velocities of axons within the pyramidal tract are the most likely factor causing the observed MepL distribution. Under this assumption, the two peaks of the density function are suggestive of the presence of two fibre populations in the human corticospinal tract corresponding to the fast and the slow type of cells found in the pyramidal tract of cats (Takahashi, 1965; Deschênes et al., 1979) and primates (Humphrey and Corrie, 1978); and corresponding to the findings from anatomical studies in man (Weil and Lassek, 1929; Lassek and Rasmussen, 1939; Verhaart, 1947, 1950; Graf von Keyserlingk and Schramm, 1984; Terao et al., 1994). Interestingly, Edgley et al. (1997) found that fast-conducting corticospinal had lower thresholds for D waves in response to TMS, whereas slow-conducting corticospinal axons had lower thresholds for I waves, and a D wave could be elicited in only 3 out of 23 axons with a conduction velocity <40 m/s.

    • Betz cells of the primary motor cortex

      2024, Journal of Comparative Neurology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text