Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 500, Issues 1–2, 23 October 1989, Pages 131-138
Brain Research

Number, size, and class of peripheral nerve fibers regenerating after crush, multiple crush, and graft

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(89)90306-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Morphometric characterization of fiber regeneration in a distal nerve after focal proximal nerve injury may provide useful clinical information and insights about underlying neurobiologic mechanisms. The myelinated (MF) and unmyelinated (UF) fibers of peroneal nerve of groups of mice were assessed 9 months after crush, graft, and multiple crush injury of the proximal sciatic nerve: number and size distribution of axon areas, myelin areas, and fiber diameters. After crush, number of regenerated MF and UF was almost identical to that of controls. Their size distribution had almost returned to normal. After graft and multiple crush, fiber number had returned to normal or was significantly increased beyond normal but there were only a few large fibers present. This may be explained by: (a) disproportionate regeneration of small-diameter compared to large-diameter classes of fibers; (b) misdirected regrowth of fibers, so that functional reinnervation was not established, resulting in failure of development or retrograde atrophy and degeneration; or (c) cellular alterations at the site of injury or in the distal nerve which inhibited neural outgrowth or elongation or did not inhibit outgrowth but retarded or prevented maturation. We conclude that explanation (b) is involved, and that there is some evidence favoring the roles of (a) and (c).

References (32)

  • MackelR. et al.

    Reinnervation of mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin following peripheral nerve repair

    Brain Research

    (1983)
  • SchröderJ.M.

    Altered ratio between axon diameter and myelin sheath thickness in regenerated nerve fibers

    Brain Research

    (1972)
  • AitkenJ.T. et al.

    Maturation of regenerating nerve fibres with various peripheral connexions

    J. Anat.

    (1947)
  • BoringE.G.

    Cutaneous sensation after nerve-division

    Q. J. Exp. Physiol.

    (1916)
  • BrayG.M. et al.

    Regeneration of peripheral unmyelinated nerves. Fate of the axonal sprouts which develop after injury

    J. Anat.

    (1974)
  • DoddJ. et al.

    Axons guidance and the patterning of neuronal projections in vertebrates

    Science

    (1988)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Facilitated sprouting in a peripheral nerve injury

      2008, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Overall the findings indicate that just beyond crush zones, even if extensive and segmental, there is exuberant axon sprouting and that such sprouts mature and compete for more distal pathways to targets. The rise in distal sprouts from branching after injury has been previously highlighted, especially after more severe injuries (Mackinnon et al., 1991; Toft et al., 1988; Giannini et al., 1989; Lago and Navarro, 2006). The competition among these sprouts was highlighted by Witzel et al. (2005) after transection injuries.

    • Differential growth of axons from sensory and motor neurons through a regenerative electrode: A stereological, retrograde tracer, and functional study in the rat

      2004, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      The size of myelinated fibers regenerated distally to the sieve was much lower than normal, 89% of them being smaller than 5 μm. However, no conclusion may be derived from those measurements regarding the type of nerve fiber that they represent, since axons regenerated across a gap or a nerve graft never achieve their normal original size (Giannini et al., 1989; Le Beau et al., 1988), and may undergo late atrophy if they do not reinnervate target tissues. Significant differences were observed in the regenerative capacity of axons arising from different neuron types.

    • Identification of myelinated motor and sensory axons in a regenerating mixed nerve

      2000, Journal of Hand Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The recovery rate at 12 weeks was 1.1. These results are almost in agreement with some previous reports.1,10,11,37 At 2 weeks the number of CA-positive axons corresponded to over two thirds of the total number of axons; it was already 80% of that of CA-positive axons at 12 weeks.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text