Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 548, Issues 1–2, 10 May 1991, Pages 305-309
Brain Research

Hippocampal type I and type II corticosteroid receptor affinities are reduced in rats predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(91)91137-PGet rights and content

Abstract

It has been suggested that individual predisposition to develop amphetamine self-administration is associated with impairment in corticosteroid negative feedback mechanisms. Since corticosteroid receptors, particularly those in the hippocampus, are involved in corticosterone feedback sensitivity, we examined the relation between individual differences in amphetamine self-administration and characteristics of hippocampal corticosteroid receptors. Rats were selected on the basis of likelihood to self-administer amphetamine and designed as: (1) High Responding (HR) rats, who quickly acquire the response and (2) Low Responding (LR), who fail to self-administer amphetamine. We found lower affinities both for hippocampal type I and type II corticosteroid receptors in the HR animals. These data suggest that modification of hippocampal corticosteroid receptors may be responsible for the predisposition of some animals for amphetamine self-administration. Because HR rats also show a greater behavioral and endocrinological response in a novel environment, these differences in affinities suggest a relation among amphetamine self-administration, control of the corticosterone feedback loop, serum levels of corticosterone and characteristics of hippocampal corticosteroid receptors. The implication is that pharmacological manipulations of corticosteroid receptors may reveal new therapeutic strategies for drug abuse.

References (34)

  • DienstbierR.A.

    Arousal and physiological toughness: implications for mental and physical health

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1989)
  • HollenbergS.M. et al.

    Primary structure and expression of a functional human glucorticoid receptor cDNA

    Nature

    (1985)
  • Keller-WoodM.E. et al.

    Corticosteroid inhibition of ACTH secretion

    Endocr. Rev.

    (1984)
  • LowryM.T.

    Reserpine-induced decrease in type I and type II corticosteroid receptors in neuronal and lymphoid tissues of adrenalectomized rts

    Neuroendocrinology

    (1990)
  • Maccari, S., Piazza, P.V., Deminière, J.M., Lemaire, V., Mormède, P., Simon, H., Angelucci, L. and Le Moal, M., Life...
  • Maccari, S., Mormède, P., Piazza, P.V., Simon, H., Angelucci, L. and Le Moal, M., Hippocamapl type I and type II...
  • MagarinosA.M. et al.

    Glucocorticoid negative feedback and glucocorticoid receptors after hippocampectomy in rats

    Horm. Metab. Res.

    (1987)
  • Cited by (45)

    • Differential effects of social defeat in rats with high and low locomotor response to novelty

      2011, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      LR-C animals showed significantly higher GR mRNA expression in the dentate gyrus when compared to HR-C. This is consistent with previously reported data that LR animals have higher GR mRNA levels and higher corticosteroid receptor affinity than HR in the hippocampus (Maccari et al., 1991; Kabbaj et al., 2000, 2007). Direct microinjection of the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist RU38486 in the hippocampus significantly decreases anxiety-like behavior in LR in the light-dark box test, an indication that the GR levels in the hippocampus are directly correlated to anxiety-like behavior (Kabbaj et al., 2000), and might be implicated in the higher anxiety levels displayed by LR rats.

    • Locomotor response to novelty as a predictor of reactivity to aversive stimuli in the rat

      2007, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Differential reactivity to environmental novelty and to drugs of abuse between HR and LR appear to be related to hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis reactivity. For example, compared to LR, HR secrete corticosterone for a prolonged period of time following exposure to novelty (Piazza et al., 1991a), differentially express corticotrophin releasing hormone mRNA in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus central nucleus of the amygdala (Kabbaj et al., 2000) and exhibit lower affinities for hippocampal type I and II corticosteroid receptors, which are involved in corticosteroid negative feedback mechanisms (Maccari et al., 1991). Furthermore, HR are more sensitive to the reinforcing properties of corticosterone (Piazza et al., 1993).

    • Spontaneous appetence for wheel-running: a model of dependency on physical activity in rat

      2006, European Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      In physiological terms, it has been shown that HR and LR rats differ in the response on their HPA axis to novel situations. HR rats present a prolonged increase in blood corticosterone levels, unlike LR rats [11,29]. Changes in the response to novel situations as a result of physical activity and the synchronization of circadian rhythms suggest that modifications may occur in the functioning of the HPA axis as a result of free physical activity, thus confirming the influence of physical activity on the HPA axis, as previously shown [5,8,14].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by la Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale. l'Institut National de la Santéet de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) and l'Universitéde Bordeaux II.

    View full text