Quality of retinal image stabilization during small natural and artificial body rotations in man

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(79)90243-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Two-dimensional head rotations recorded from 2 subjects sitting still, without artificial head support, showed appreciable movement over the frequency range d.c. to 7 Hz. Capacity of vestibuloocular reflex and visually guided eye movements to null motion over this dynamic range was examined by simultaneously recording 2-dimensional head and eye rotations while sinusoidally rotating subjects over the frequency range 0.1 to 15 Hz using small amplitudes. At best, oculomotor compensation removed about 90% of head motion from eye motion in space. Representative compensation was poorer. Compensation for natural motions of unsupported heads while sitting and standing was also incomplete resulting in substantially more eye motion in space than was observed with head supported.

These observations, coupled with recent demonstrations of plasticity of the vestibulo-ocular reflex, led us to suggest that the degree of compensatory oculomotor response is actively adjusted downwards so as to guarantee sufficient retinal image motion to prevent perceptual fading when the body is relatively stationary and is actively adjusted upwards, so as to guarantee sufficient retinal stability to prevent perceptual blurring when the body moves actively. Seen this way. the goal of oculomotor compensation is not retinal image stabilization, but rather controlled retinal image motion adjusted so as to be optimal for visual processing over the full range of natural motions of the body.

Reference (23)

  • GonshorA. et al.

    Short-term adaptive changes in the human vestibulo-ocular reflex arc

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1976)
  • Cited by (142)

    • Eye stabilization

      2022, Progress in Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Altogether, these findings indicate that fixation and pursuit are neurologically distinct. When humans and animals have their heads immobilized, drift velocities are about 0.1–0.2 deg/s. However, Skavenski et al. (1979) showed that when the head is free, even when subjects are trying to stay as still as possible, drift rises to 0.3–0.7 deg/s, because the vestibulo-ocular reflex is not able to compensate fully for head drifts (see also Section 4 in chapter “Behavior of the saccadic system: Metrics of timing and accuracy” by Robinson). And, when we wish to identify an object in our visual scene barely at acuity threshold, we do stand still, and even hold our breath, so this drift range is probably optimum for vision.

    • The function and phylogeny of eye movements

      2022, Progress in Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given the inaccuracies of the subsystems just discussed, it is not likely that visual fading would occur in most normal situations. Skavenski et al. (1979) found that under-compensation of normal head tremor by the vestibulo-ocular reflex in seated human subjects caused retinal slip velocities to rise from about 0.23 deg/s, that occurred when the head was immobilized, to about 0.4 deg/s. They suggest that this is a deliberate design choice to increase retinal slip and lessen further any possibility of fading.

    • 1.15 - Circuits for Feature Selectivity in the Inner Retina

      2020, The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference: Volume 1-7, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The main features of this research were reported at theNinth Annual Symposium of the Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester in May. 1975 and at the I.E.E.E. Symposium for Cybernetics and Society. San Francisco, 1975.

    View full text