Depth of focus, eye size and visual acuity

doi:10.1016/0042-6989(80)90063-2

Vision Research

Volume 20, Issue 10, 1980, Pages 827-835

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(80)90063-2 Get rights and content

Abstract

We develop formulas for calculating the approximate depth of focus of any eye. They show that the magnitude of depth of focus is inversely proportional to the size of the eye and to its visual acuity. One particular implication of these quantitative relations, which is supported by previous data from rats and human infants, is that small eyes with low acuity should have large depths of focus. We show that the observed relation between defocus and contrast sensitivity in rats in predicted by our formulas. We also analyze recent findings in human infants and show that they demonstrate a good correspondence between the improvement in accuracy of the accommodative response with age and the reduction in depth of focus (predicted from our formulas) as acuity and eye size increase over the same age range. Optical factors such as astigmatism, refractive error and chromatic and spherical aberration should have no effect on visual resolution unless they exceed the depth of focus of an eye. Thus, our arguments imply that these factors may be relatively unimportant in small eyes with low acuity.

Reference (57)

AtkinsonJ. et al.
Development of contrast sensitivity over the first 3 months of life in the human infant
Vision Res.
(1977)
BlakeR. et al.
Visual resolution in the cat
Vision Res.
(1974)
BlockM.T.
A note on the refraction and image formation in the rat's eye
Vision Res.
(1969)
BloomM. et al.
Visual acuity and the near point of accommodation in cats
Vision Res.
(1977)
CharmanW.N. et al.
The optical system of the goldfish eye
Vision Res.
(1973)
DeValoisR.L. et al.
Psychophysical studies of monkey vision—III. Spatial luminance contrast sensitivity tests of macaque and human observers
Vision Res.
(1974)
DuPontJ. et al.
A schematic dioptic apparatus for the frog's eye
Vision Res.
(1976)
GwiazdaJ. et al.
Infant visual acuity and its meridional variation
Vision Res.
(1978)
HughesA.
A schematic eye for the rat
Vision Res.
(1979)
KulikowskiJ.J.
Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation
Vision Res.
(1976)

MillodotM. et al.

Hypermetropia of small animals and chromatic aberration

Vision Res.

(1978)

NorthmoreD.P.M. et al.

Contrast sensitivity and acuity of the goldfish

Vision Res.

(1979)

NyeP.W.

The binocular acuity of the pigeon measured in terms of the modulation transfer function

Vision Res.

(1968)

PowersM.K. et al.

Single retinal ganglion cell responses in the dark-reared rat: grating acuity, contrast sensitivity and defocusing

Vision Res.

(1978)

SuthersR.A. et al.

Optics of echolocating bats

Vision Res.

(1970)

VakkurG.J. et al.

The schematic eye in the cat

Vision Res.

(1963)

VakkurG.J. et al.

Visual optics in the cat, including posterior nodal distance and retinal landmarks

Vision Res.

(1963)

Van HofM.W.

Visual acuity in the rabbit

Vision Res.

(1967)

WiesenfeldZ. et al.

Refractive state and visual acuity in the hooded rat

Vision Res.

(1976)

WilcoxJ.G. et al.

The size and shape of the pupil in lightly anaesthetized cats as a function of luminance

Vision Res.

(1975)

AllenJ.

Visual acuity development in human infants up to 6-months of age

(1979)

BanksM.S.

The development of visual accommodation during early infancy

Child Devel.

(1980)

BanksM.S.

Infant refraction and accommodation

BanksM.S. et al.

Acuity and contrast sensitivity in 1-, 2- and 3-month-old human infants

Invest. Ophthal.

(1978)

BrindleyG.S.

Physiology of the Retina and Visual Pathway

(1970)

CampbellF.W.

The depth of field of the human eye

Optica Acta

(1957)

CharmanW.N. et al.

Pupil diameter and the depth-of-focus of the human eye as measured by laser speckle

Optica Acta

(1977)

CookR.C. et al.

Refraction and ocular findings in the newborn

Am. J. Ophthal.

(1951)

Cited by (178)

Is accommodation a confounder in pupillometry research?
2021, Biological Psychology
Much psychological research uses pupil diameter measurements to investigate the cognitive and emotional effects of visual stimuli. A potential problem is that accommodating at a nearby point causes the pupil to constrict. This study examined to what extent accommodation is a confounder in pupillometry research. Participants solved multiplication problems at different distances (Experiment 1) and looked at line drawings with different monocular depth cues (Experiment 2) while their pupil diameter, refraction, and vergence angle were recorded using a photorefractor. Experiment 1 showed that the pupils dilated while performing the multiplications, for all presentation distances. Pupillary constriction due to accommodation was not strong enough to override pupil dilation due to cognitive load. Experiment 2 showed that monocular depth cues caused a small shift in refraction in the expected direction. We conclude that, for the young student sample we used, pupil diameter measurements are not substantially affected by accommodation.
Effects of low intensity ambient lighting on refractive development in infant rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)
2020, Vision Research
Citation Excerpt :
We speculate that the primary effects of larger pupils were to increase retinal illumination and decrease the depth-of-focus (Charman & Whitefoot, 1977; Green, Powers, & Banks, 1980). Using equation (9) from Green, Powers, and Banks (Green et al., 1980) and visual acuity estimates from Boothe, Dobson and Teller (7 cycles/degree for 7-week-old infant monkeys) (Boothe, Dobson, & Teller, 1985), the depth-of-focus at 7 weeks of age for the dim-light- and normal-light-reared monkeys was 0.20 D and 0.28 D, respectively. Note that the dioptric differences in depth-of-focus between the dim-and normal-light monkeys would likely be smaller after accounting for any reductions in visual acuity due to lower ambient lighting (van Ness & Bouman, 1967).
Studies in chickens suggest low intensity ambient lighting causes myopia. The purpose of this experiment was to examine the effects of low intensity ambient lighting (dim light) on normal refractive development in macaque monkeys. Seven infant rhesus monkeys were reared under dim light (room illumination level: ~55 lx) from 24 to ~310 days of age with otherwise unrestricted vision. Refractive error, corneal power, ocular axial dimensions, and choroidal thickness were measured in anesthetized animals at the onset of the experiment and periodically throughout the dim-light-rearing period, and were compared with those of normal-light-reared monkeys. We found that dim light did not produce myopia; instead, dim-light monkeys were hyperopic relative to normal-light monkeys (median refractive errors at ~155 days, OD: +3.13 D vs. +2.31 D; OS: +3.31D vs. +2.44 D; at ~310 days, OD: +2.75D vs. +1.78D, OS: +3.00D vs. +1.75D). In addition, dim-light rearing caused sustained thickening in the choroid, but it did not alter corneal power development, nor did it change the axial nature of the refractive errors. These results showed that, for rhesus monkeys and possibly other primates, low ambient lighting by itself is not necessarily myopiagenic, but might compromise the efficiency of emmetropization.
Visual Sensory Development
2020, Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development
Research Progress of Large Viewing-Area 3D Holographic Near-Eye Display
2024, Laser and Photonics Reviews
Effects of brightness variations on a smartphone-based version of Radner reading charts
2024, Eye (Basingstoke)
Developmental and Aging-Related Changes of the Optic Nerve in the Albino Rat: Histological, Histomorphometric and Immunohistochemical Study
2023, Egyptian Journal of Histology

View all citing articles on Scopus

^*: Present address: Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37420, U.S.A.

View full text