Elsevier

Vision Research

Volume 29, Issue 8, 1989, Pages 989-1004
Vision Research

Stereopsis and contrast

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(89)90114-4Get rights and content

Abstract

We have measured threshold disparity as a function of the spatial frequency (0.25–20 c/deg) and contrast (0.02–0.75) of sine-wave gratings. In forced-choice trials, subjects indicated whether a target grating had crossed or uncrossed disparity relative to a reference grating. Thresholds were lowest near 3 c/deg and rose in proportion to spatial period at lower frequencies. Above 3 c/deg, there were marked individual differences. Across the range of spatial frequencies, disparity sensitivity and contrast sensitivity were correlated (r = 0.84). Threshold disparity was inversely proportional to the square root of contrast. When the contrast seen by one eye was reduced producing unequal monocular contrasts, threshold disparity rose more than when the contrast seen by the two eyes was reduced by the same amount. Our results have implications for stereo models that use zero crossings, peaks and troughs, or centroids as matching primitives. These models can account for the decline in disparity sensitivity at low sapatial frequencies but only the peak model satisfactorily accounts for the effect of contrast. If the limiting sources of noise in the two eyes are highly correlated, the effect of unequal monocular contrast can be accounted for using a differential-amplifier principle.

References (37)

  • WestheimerG.

    Spatial phase sensitivity for sinusoidal grating targets

    Vision Research

    (1978)
  • WilsonH.R.

    Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity

    Vision Research

    (1986)
  • BerryR.N.

    Quantitative relations in vernier, real depth and stereoscopic depth acuities

    Journal of experimental Psychology

    (1948)
  • BlakemoreC. et al.

    Evidence for disparity detecting neurons in the human visual system

    Journal of Physiology, London

    (1972)
  • BurtonG.J.

    Contrast discrimination by the human visual system

    Biological Cybernetics

    (1981)
  • CampbellF.W. et al.

    Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings

    Journal of Physiology, London

    (1968)
  • CarlsonC. et al.

    A non-linear spatial frequency signal detection model for the human visual system

    Journal of the optical Society of America

    (1978)
  • FeltonT.B. et al.

    Disparity processing of spatial frequencies in man

    Journal of Physiology, London

    (1972)
  • Cited by (236)

    • Learning to see in depth

      2022, Vision Research
    • A gain-control disparity energy model for perceived depth from disparity

      2021, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it is known that luminance contrast does affect depth perception in various ways. A decrease in luminance contrast increases the apparent distance of a target (Fry, Bridgman, & Ellerbrock, 1949; Rohaly & Wilson, 1999) and reduces the stereo acuity according to a power law function (Halpern & Blake, 1988; Heckmann & Schor, 1989; Legge & Gu, 1989; Cormack, Stevenson, & Schor, 1991). Luminance contrast also affects the peak-to-trough difference in perceived depth.

    • Amblyopia

      2021, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text