How is myogenesis initiated in the embryo?

doi:10.1016/0168-9525(96)10025-1

Trends in Genetics

Volume 12, Issue 6, June 1996, Pages 218-223

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9525(96)10025-1 Get rights and content

Abstract

Skeletal myoblasts are derived from paraxial mesoderm, but how myoblasts acquire their identity is still a matter of speculation. The characterization of molecular markers and, in some cases, the analysis of mutations in the corresponding genes, has now made it possible to ask specific questions about this process. Specification of somite cell fate depends on epigenetic factors. Adjacent tissues, such as the neural tube, notochord, dorsal ectoderm and lateral mesoderm, act either positively or negatively on the different myogenic precursor populations in the somite. Candidate molecules for this complex signalling activity include sonic bedgebog and the Wnt proteins as positive signals, and BMP4 as a possible inhibitor. Although it is generally assumed that induction is required, some observations suggest that embryonic cells might have a tendency to undergo myogenesis as a ‘default’ pathway. By analogy with Drosophila, where the neurogenic genes affect myogenesis, the vertebrate homologues of notch and its ligands could be candidate molecules for a repression or derepression mechanism. Similar studies with cultured muscle cells also implicate other HLH factors as potential inhibitors of the MyoD family and, hence, of inappropriate myogenesis.

Referencesss (58)

EichmannA. et al.
Mech. Dev.
(1993)
RudnickiM.A.
Cell
(1993)
MarcelleC. et al.
Dev. Biol.
(1995)
VivarelliE. et al.
Dev. Biol.
(1986)
SternH.M. et al.
Dev. Biol.
(1995)
BuffingerN. et al.
Dev. Biol.
(1995)
FanC.M. et al.
Cell
(1994)
RudnickiM.A. et al.
Cell
(1992)
SatohN. et al.
Trends Genet.
(1995)
GamelA.J. et al.
Dev. Biol.
(1995)

ChristB. et al.

Anat. Embryol.

(1995)

(1991)

PownalM.E. et al.

Dev. Biol.

(1992)

Cited by (214)

Functional Development of Respiratory Muscles
2017, Fetal and Neonatal Physiology, 2-Volume Set
The epigenetic regulation of embryonic myogenesis and adult muscle regeneration by histone methylation modification
2016, Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
Citation Excerpt :
In Splotch mice, because of mutation of Pax3, cells fail to develop the hypaxial domain of the somite and thus lack limb musculature and other muscle masses in the body. However, epaxial-derived muscles are less affected [6,10–12]. In the chick embryo, Pax3:Pax7-positive cells are maintained as proliferating cells and do not express myogenic regulatory factors or muscle proteins.
Skeletal muscle formation in vertebrates is derived from the paraxial mesoderm, which develops into myogenic precursor cells and finally differentiates into mature myofibers. This myogenic program involves temporal-spatial molecular events performed by transcription regulators (such as members of the Pax, MRFs and Six families) and signaling pathways (such as Wnts, BMP and Shh signaling). Epigenetic regulation, including histone post-translational modifications is crucial for controlling gene expression through recruitment of various chromatin-modifying enzymes that alter chromatin dynamics during myogenesis. The chromatin modifying enzymes are also recruited at regions of muscle gene regulation, coordinating transcription regulators to influence gene expression. In particular, the reversible methylation status of histone N-terminal tails provides the important regulatory mechanisms in either activation or repression of muscle genes. In this report, we review the recent literatures to deduce mechanisms underlying the epigenetic regulation of gene expression with a focus on histone methylation modification during embryo myogenesis and adult muscle regeneration. Recent results from different histone methylation/demethylation modifications have increased our understanding about the highly intricate layers of epigenetic regulations involved in myogenesis and cross-talk of histone enzymes with the muscle-specific transcriptional machinery.
Insights into Skeletal Muscle Development and Applications in Regenerative Medicine
2013, International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology
Citation Excerpt :
However, it is clear that additional signals important for specifying embryonic muscle are yet to be identified, particularly during human development. It is generally believed that the axial structures in the developing embryo (neural tube and notochord) play an important role in differentiation of skeletal muscle by producing sonic hedgehog and WNT signals (Cossu et al., 1996). However signaling networks that regulate skeletal muscle growth and differentiation are still emerging, a topic addressed in subsequent sections.
Embryonic and postnatal development of skeletal muscle entails highly regulated processes whose complexity continues to be deconstructed. One key stage of development is the satellite cell, whose niche is composed of multiple cell types that eventually contribute to terminally differentiated myotubes. Understanding these developmental processes will ultimately facilitate treatments of myopathies such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a disease characterized by compromised cell membrane structure, resulting in severe muscle wasting. One theoretical approach is to use pluripotent stem cells in a therapeutic setting to help replace degenerated muscle tissue. This chapter discusses key myogenic developmental stages and their regulatory pathways; artificial myogenic induction in pluripotent stem cells; advantages and disadvantages of DMD animal models; and therapeutic approaches targeting DMD. Furthermore, skeletal muscle serves as an excellent paradigm for understanding general cell fate decisions throughout development.
Barx Homeobox Family in Muscle Development and Regeneration
2012, International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology
Homeobox transcription factors are key intrinsic regulators of myogenesis. In studies spanning several years, we have characterized the homeobox factor Barx2 as a novel marker for muscle progenitor cells and an important regulator of muscle growth and repair. In this review, we place the expression and function of Barx2 and its paralogue Barx1 in context with other muscle-expressed homeobox factors in both embryonic and adult myogenesis. We also describe the structure and regulation of Barx genes and possible gene/disease associations. The functional domains of Barx proteins, their molecular interactions, and cellular functions are presented with particular emphasis on control of genes and processes involved in myogenic differentiation. Finally, we describe the patterns of Barx gene expression in vivo and the phenotypes of various Barx gene perturbation models including null mice. We focus on the Barx2 null mouse model, which has demonstrated the critical roles of Barx2 in postnatal myogenesis including muscle maintenance during aging, and regeneration of acute and chronic muscle injury.
Porcine skeletal muscle development regulated by MicroRNA: a review
2023, Shengwu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Biotechnology
The Role of Adipocyte Precursors in Development and Obesity
2023, Handbook of Obesity - Volume 1: Epidemiology, Etiology, and Physiopathology, Fourth Edition

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Trends in Genetics

How is myogenesis initiated in the embryo?

Abstract

Mech. Dev.

Cell

Dev. Biol.

Dev. Biol.

Dev. Biol.

Dev. Biol.

Cell

Cell

Trends Genet.

Dev. Biol.

Mech. Dev.

Cell

Cell

Dev. Biol.

Cell

Dev. Biol.

Anat. Embryol.

Semin. Dev. Biol.

Development

Development

Mech. Dev.

Development

Development

Development

Nature

Cell

Development

Dev. Biol.