Facial reactions to fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant stimuli☆
References (29)
Habituation and dishabituation of responses innervated by the autonomic nervous system
- et al.
Habituation of the electrodermal orienting reaction to potentially phobic and supposedly neutral stimuli in normal subjects
Biological Psychology
(1974) - et al.
Mechanisms, instrumentation, recording techniques and quantification of responses
Evolution of facial expression
Science
(1963)Nonverbal behavior and the theory of emotion: The facial feedback hypothesis
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1980)- et al.
Electromyograms as measures of extent and affectivity of information processing
American Psychologist
(1981) The expression of emotion in man and animals
(1872)Facial reactions to facial expressions
Psychophysiology
(1982)Emotional conditioning to facial stimuli: A psychobiological analysis
- Dimberg U. (in press). Facial expressions and emotional reactions: A psychobiological analysis of human social...
Cross-cultural studies of facial expressions
Contour-following integrator for dynamic tracking of electromyographic data
Psychophysiology
Electromyographic studies of facial expressions of emotions and patterns of emotions
Cited by (73)
Angry and fearful compared to happy or neutral faces as conditional stimuli in human fear conditioning: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsEmotions and physiological responses elicited by neighbours sounds in wooden residential buildings
2022, Building and EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :These results are consistent with previous studies in the auditory domain in terms of fEMG [17,25,81], HR [27–29] and EDA [82]. The increased fEMG CS activity and decreased fEMG ZM activity are generally caused by unpleasant and negative stimuli [17,25,26,63,81]. Thus, the results of the fEMG suggest that sounds from neighbours, especially footsteps, may generate adverse reactions in residents.
Psychophysiological underpinnings of proactive and reactive aggression in young men and women
2021, Physiology and BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Most of the research linking low ANS arousal to proactive aggression to support the fearlessness hypothesis has used resting heart rate. Although this has been crucial in understanding biological markers for future aggression, heart rate as a marker for fear reactivity provides limited information for interpretation, which may explain why there are mixed findings linking heart rate with fear [5, 7, 27, 34]. At any given moment, heart rate is an integrative product of three neural influences: the intrinsic pacemaker cells in the sinoatrial node, parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) fibers, and sympathetic nervous system (SNS) fibers [51].
The neurophysiological basis of optimism bias
2020, Cognitive Biases in Health and Psychiatric Disorders: Neurophysiological FoundationsAffect dynamics of facial EMG during continuous emotional experiences
2018, Biological PsychologyCitation Excerpt :The negative movie, taken from a horror film, induced fear and distress. A series of previous studies reported consistent corrugator activations in response to fear stimuli (Codispoti et al., 2008; Dimberg, 1986; Magnée, Stekelenburg, Kemner, & de Gelder, 2007). Fear was chosen over sadness, since it is more prone to evoke phasic emotional events and was shown to elicit higher corrugator activation as compared to sadness in a previous study employing movies (Kreibig et al., 2007).
The facial motor system
2014, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :In a series of experiments it was shown that such reactions are relatively fast, starting at 300–500 ms from the onset of visual stimuli (Dimberg and Thunberg, 1998), they do not require awareness of the external stimuli (Dimberg et al., 2000) and are fully automatic (Dimberg et al., 2002) (Fig. 9). Facial reactions to emotional stimuli are thought to occur in response to any stimulus with affective valence (Dimberg, 1986) but have been studied mainly in response to others’ emotional facial displays. It is a very common error, even in the scientific literature, to assimilate affective facial displays such as expressions of happiness (smile) or sadness (frown) to the phenomena of laughing and crying.
- ☆
This study was supported by grants from Alrutz' Donationsfond, Uppsala University, Sweden.