Elsevier

Neuroscience Letters

Volume 53, Issue 1, 7 January 1985, Pages 45-49
Neuroscience Letters

The effects of orofacial sensory input on spontaneously occurring and apomorphine-induced rhythmical jaw movements in the anesthetized guinea pig

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(85)90095-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The effects of tonic mandibular loading (jaw depression) on spontaneously occurring and apomorphine (APO)-induced rhythmical jaw movements (RJMs) were examined in the anesthetized guinea pig. It was found that this type of perturbation significantly increased only the amplitude and burst duration of the masseter (jaw closer) EMG activity, whereas the frequency of RJMs was not changed. The data suggest that jaw closer muscle spindle or temporomandibular joint feedback does not strongly influence the activity of the neural networks responsible for determining the frequency of RJMs in the anesthetized guinea pig.

References (25)

  • Chandler, S.H., Nielsen, S. and Goldberg, L.J., The effects of a glycine antagonist (strychnine) on cortically induced...
  • W.W. Daniel

    Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences

  • Cited by (18)

    • Relationships between masticatory rhythmicity, body mass and cephalometrically-determined aesthetic and functional variables during development in humans

      2014, Archives of Oral Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, evidence from several sources indicates that the neuromotor mechanisms that would seem most likely to be able to adjust TC to scale with MB in fact do not operate in a way that would allow the scaling to emerge. For instance, ketamine-anesthetized guinea pigs manifest spontaneous rhythmic jaw movements that occur near the natural rate at which the species masticates; however, loading the jaws of these animals with 50-g weights did not affect the frequency of the jaw movements.20 It was posited that spindle-mediated feedback served to increase muscle recruitment sufficient to counter the increased load so that jaw rhythmicity was unaffected.

    • Relationship between masticatory rhythm, body mass and mandibular morphology in primates

      2013, Archives of Oral Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The central pattern generator receives inputs from sensory receptors in the lips, oral mucosa, jaw-closing muscles and periodontal ligaments around the roots of the teeth, and the final motor commands are sent by the central pattern generator.4,6 Although the duration of a complete mastication sequence, and the parameters of the individual masticatory cycles, vary with food type, the masticatory rhythm produced by the central pattern generator is fixed within individual animals7 and within species.8–12 It has been found that the masticatory frequency decreases as Mb increases.13–19

    • Analysis of temporal variation in human masticatory cycles during gum chewing

      2013, Archives of Oral Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The neural control of masticatory movements appears to be partly controlled by central pattern generating (CPG) circuits located in the pontine and upper medullary brain stem. The basic movement patterns produced by the CPG are modifiable by sensory feedback and feed forward control during ongoing rhythmic movement sequences.6,7 The sensory modulation either accesses CPG circuits directly via afferent connections with brainstem circuitry, or indirectly via loops involving cerebral regions.7–10

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text