Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 45, Issue 3, May 1990, Pages 203-219
Hearing Research

Basilar membrane nonlinearity determines auditory nerve rate-intensity functions and cochlear dynamic range

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(90)90121-5Get rights and content

Abstract

In a previous paper (Winter et al., 1990) we demonstrated the existence of a new type of auditory-nerve rate-intensity function, the straight type, as well as a correlation between rate-level type, threshold and spontaneous rate. In this paper we now show that the variation in rate-intensity functions has its origin in the basilar membrane nonlinearity. Comparison of rate-intensity functions at characteristic frequency and at a tail-frequency show that the rate-intensity functions are identical at low firing rates and that the sloping-saturation and straight types deviate from the standard function only at higher firing rates. The frequencies at which the deviations occur, and the change from saturating to sloping-saturation or straight, are closely correlated with the characteristic frequency of the fibre. Using the tail-frequency rate-intensity function as a calibration, it is possible to derive the basilar membrane input-output function at characteristic frequency from the characteristic frequency rate-intensity function. The resulting derived basilar membrane input-output functions are of a simple form and agree well with published direct measurements of basilar membrane motion. They show that the wide dynamic range to which the cochlea responds, about 120 decibels, is compressed by the basilar membrane nonlinearity into a much smaller range of about 30–35 decibels. General characteristics of the derived basilar membrane input-output curves show features which agree well with psychoacoustic studies of loudness estimation.

Reference (33)

  • DelgutteB.

    Peripheral auditory processing of speech information: Implications from a physiological study of intensity discrimination

  • HarrisD.M. et al.

    Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1979)
  • HellmanR.P. et al.

    Monaural loudness function at 1000 cps and interaural summation

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1968)
  • JohnstoneB.M. et al.

    Stimulus-related potassium changes in the organ of Corti of guinea-pig

    J. Physiol.

    (1989)
  • KempD.T.

    The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure — evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics

    Scand. Audiol. Suppl.

    (1979)
  • KiangN.Y.-S.

    Peripheral processing of auditory information

  • Cited by (187)

    • A simplified physiological model of rate-level functions of auditory-nerve fibers

      2021, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Due to the tight negative correlation of threshold and spontaneous rate (e.g., Schmiedt, 1989; Ohlemiller and Echteler, 1990; Winter et al., 1990; Ohlemiller et al., 1991; Yates, 1991; Tsuji and Liberman, 1997; Taberner and Liberman, 2005), the shape of the rate-level function also varies with spontaneous rate (Winter et al., 1990; Sumner and Palmer, 2012). For a given ANF, the shape of the rate-level function can also vary with stimulus frequency (Sachs and Abbas, 1974; Yates et al., 1990, 2000; Cooper and Yates, 1994; Sumner and Palmer, 2012). Rate-level functions for stimulus frequencies well below CF are typically flat saturating, whereas those at CF are often sloping saturating or straight (Sachs and Abbas, 1974; Yates et al., 1990; Sumner and Palmer, 2012).

    • Evidence that hidden hearing loss underlies amplitude modulation encoding deficits in individuals with and without tinnitus

      2017, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hidden hearing loss involving low-SR fibers has been proposed to underlie inter-subject differences in temporal coding ability that have been observed in individuals with normal audiograms measured to the clinical standard of 8 kHz. Low-SR fibers typically respond at sound levels above 40 dB SPL (the level where the discharge rate of high-SR fibers is strongly saturated; Yates et al., 1990) and are robust to masking by background noise (Costalupes, 1985; Young and Barta, 1986). Low-SR fiber loss is thought to degrade auditory sensitivity to temporal modulations of sound that are important for listening in noisy environments, such that individual differences in listening under these conditions may reflect hidden low-SR fiber synaptopathy (Bharadwaj et al., 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Present address: M.R.C. Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD U.K.

    View full text