Genomic imprinting and candidate genes in the Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes

https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-437X(93)90119-AGet rights and content

Abstract

The Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes are now well established as the paradigm of genomic imprinting in human disease. Over the past year, much has been learnt about the mechanisms by which these syndromes arise and molecular diagnostics for the majority of patients are now available. Mouse models for aspects of the syndromes have been established, and the first association between a genem located in chromosome 15, at 15q11-q13, and a phenotype (albinism) has been proven. Large parts of the critical regions have been cloned and at least six genes identified. Three genes or DNA sequences may be imprinted: two of these demonstrate DNA-methylation imprints and one is functionally imprinted in mouse. While the molecular mechanism of imprinting is not yet understood, it is beginning to yield its secrets to DNA methylation, replication, and chromatin structure studies of the phenomenon.

References (51)

  • R.E. Magenis et al.

    Comparison of the 15q Deletions in Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndromes: Specific Regions, Extent of Deletions, Parental Origin, and Clinical Consequences

    Am J Med Genet

    (1990)
  • W.P. Robinson et al.

    Molecular, Cytogenetic, and Clinical Investigations of Prader-Willi Syndrome Patients

    Am J Hum Genet

    (1991)
  • M.J. Mascari et al.

    The Frequency of Uniparental Disomy in Prader-Willi Syndrome: Implications for Molecular Diagnosis

    New Engl J Med

    (1992)
  • R.D. Nicholls et al.

    Parental Uniparental Disomy of Chromosome 15 in a Child with Angelman Syndrome

    Ann Neurol

    (1992)
  • A. Mutirangura et al.

    Multiplex PCR of Three Dinucleotide Repeats in the Prader-Willi/Angelman Critical Region (15q11-q13): Molecular Diagnosis and Mechanism of Uniparental Disomy

    Hum Mol Genet

    (1993)
  • S.B. Cassidy et al.

    Trisomy 15 with Loss of the Paternal 15 as a Cause of Prader-Willi Syndrome Due to Maternal Disomy

    Am J Hum Genet

    (1992)
  • D.F.C.M. Smeets et al.

    Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndrome in Cousins from a Family with a Translocation between Chromosomes 6 and 15

    New Engl J Med

    (1992)
  • E.M. Rinchik et al.

    A Gene for the Mouse Pink-eyed Dilution Locus and for Human Type II Oculocutaneous Albinism

    Nature

    (1993)
  • J. Wagstaff et al.

    Maternal but not Paternal Transmission of 15q11-q13-linked Nondeletion Angelman Syndrome Leads to Phenotypic Expression

    Nature Genet

    (1992)
  • J.H.M. Knoll et al.

    Ordering of Reference Markers by FISH and Assignment of the Gene for the α5 Subunit of the γ-Aminobutyric Acid Receptor within the Angelman and Prader-Willi Chromosomal Regions

    Hum Mol Genet

    (1993)
  • A. Kuwano et al.

    Molecular Dissection of the Prader-Willi/Angelman Syndrome Region (15q11–13) by YAC Cloning and FISH Analysis

    Hum Mol Genet

    (1992)
  • D.J. Driscoll et al.

    A DNA Methylation Impring, Determined by the Sex of the Parent, Distinguishes the Angelman and Prader-Willi Syndromes

    Genomics

    (1992)
  • B. Dittrich et al.

    Molecular Diagnosis of the Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndromes by Detection of Parent-of-origin Specific DNA Methylation in 15q11-q13

    Hum Genet

    (1992)
  • J. Clayton-Smith et al.

    Further Evidence for Dominant Inheritance at the Chromosome 15q11-q13 Locus in Familial Angelman Syndrome

    Am J Med Genet

    (1992)
  • J. Wagstaff et al.

    Localization of the Gene Encoding the GABAA Receptor β3 Subunit to the Angelman/Prader-Willi Region of Human Chromosome 15

    Am J Hum Genet

    (1991)
  • Cited by (77)

    • Case of 15q26-qter deletion associated with a Prader-Willi phenotype

      2020, European Journal of Medical Genetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thank you.ernally inherited genes in the 15q11.2-q13 region. The causes are paternal microdeletion in 70% of cases, maternal uniparentaldisomy (UPD) in 20–30% of cases, and maternal imprinting defect in 1% (Dagli et al., 1998 Sep 15 [Updated, 2015 May 14]; Mutirangura et al., 1993; Nicholls, 1993, 2000). The syndrome is characterized principally by severe neonatal hypotonia, with a weak suck that is followed by hyperphagia and obesity from 6 years of age onwards, developmental delay, intellectual disability, short stature, hypogonadism and behavioral disturbances (Butler, 2011; Jin, 2011).

    • The comorbidity of autism with the genomic disorders of chromosome 15q11.2-q13

      2010, Neurobiology of Disease
      Citation Excerpt :

      GABA, the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, functions to hyperpolarize the membrane through binding to ionotropic pentameric GABAA receptors. Chromosome 15q11.2-q13 contains three GABAA receptor subunit genes (GABR), GABRB3, GABRA5, and GABRG3 that are normally biallelically expressed in mouse and human (Buettner et al., 2004; Hogart et al., 2007; Nicholls, 1993). Although the 15q11.2-q13 GABR genes are not imprinted, the increased severity of PWS and AS deletion patients compared to UPD patients (Varela et al., 2004, 2005) implicates a role for GABR genes in these disorders.

    • On the origin of sensory impairment and altered pain perception in Prader-Willi syndrome: A neurophysiological study

      2009, European Journal of Pain
      Citation Excerpt :

      Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) affects both sexes, all races, and one in 22,000–27,000 live births (Butler et al., 2002; Vogels et al., 2004). The genetic basis is a deletion of the paternally derived chromosome 15 (del15q11–13) or maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) for chromosome 15 in the majority of cases (Cassidy et al., 1997; Nicholls, 1993). Other rare genetic defects can occur (Khan and Wood, 1999).

    • Molecular links between X-inactivation and autosomal imprinting: X-inactivation as a driving force for the evolution of imprinting?

      2003, Current Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Evidence for an ICR first emerged in the Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndromes loci, two developmental disorders long noted to be opposite in phenotype – for example, lethargy in PWS and hyperactivity in AS – which were mapped to contiguous, if not identical, regions of human chromosome 15. Studies in the 1990s led to the identification of several patients with so-called ‘imprinting defects’ in which deleting a 4 megabase domain including 2–3 megabases of imprinted genes within the PWS/AS locus led to a switch from a maternal to a paternal epigenotype or vice versa[76]. It is presently believed that the PWS/AS imprinting center lies in a 25–30 kilobase region and is composed of two elements: an 880 base-pair AS center 35 kilobase upstream of the Snrpn gene; and a 4.3 kilobase PWS center at the 5′ end of the Snrpn gene [35].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text