Article
Implanted functional electrical stimulation hand system in adolescents with spinal injuries: An evaluation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90425-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To study the utility and functional benefits of an implanted functional electrical stimulation (FES) system for hand grasp and release in adolescents with tetraplegia secondary to spinal cord injuries.

Design: Intervention study with before-after trial measurement with each subject as his or her own control.

Setting: Nonprofit pediatric orthopedic rehabilitation facility specializing in spinal cord injury.

Participants: A convenience sample of five adolescents between 16 and 18 years of age with C5 or C6 level tetraplegia at least 1 year after traumatic spinal cord injury. Key muscles for palmar and lateral grasp and release were excitable by electrical stimulation.

Interventions: A multichannel stimulator/receiver and eight electrodes were surgically implanted to provide stimulated palmar and lateral grasp and release. In conjunction with implantation of the FES hand system, surgical reconstruction in the form of tendon transfers, tendon lengthenings and releases, and joint arthrodeses was performed to augment stimulated hand function. Rehabilitation of the tendon transfers and training in the use of the FES hand system were provided.

Main Outcome Measures: Measurements of pinch and grasp force, the Grasp and Release Test (GRT), and an assessment of six activities of daily living (ADL) were administered before implantation of the FES hand system and at regular follow-up intervals. Result of the stimulated response of individual muscles and surgical reconstruction were evaluated using standard and stimulated muscle testing techniques and standard assessment of joint range of motion. All subjects completed follow-up testing.

Results: Lateral and palmar forces were significantly greater than baseline forces (p = .043). Heavy objects on the GRT could only be manipulated with FES, and FES increased the level of independence in 25 of 30 ADL comparisons (5 subjects, 6 activities) as compared to baseline. After training, FES was preferred in 21 of 30 comparisons over the typical means of task completion. Of the 40 electrodes implanted, 37 continue to provide excellent stimulated responses and all of the implanted stimulators have functioned without problems. The surgical reconstruction procedures greatly enhanced FES hand function by either expanding the workspace in which to utilize FES (deltoid to triceps transfer), stabilizing the wrist (brachioradialis to wrist extensor transfer), or stabilizing joints (intrinsic tenodesis transfer, FPL split transfer).

Conclusion: For five adolescents with tetraplegia, the combination of FES and surgical reconstruction provided active palmar and lateral grasp and release. Laboratory-based assessments demonstrated that the FES system increased pinch force, improved the manipulation of objects, and typically increased independence in six standard ADL as compared to pre-FES hand function. The study also showed that the five adolescents generally preferred FES for most of the ADL tested. Data on the benefits of the implanted FES hand system outside of the laboratory are needed to understand the full potential of FES.

References (47)

  • M DeBenedetti

    Restoration of elbow extension power in the tetraplegic patient using the Moberg technique

    J Hand Surg

    (1979)
  • KS Wuolle et al.

    Development of a quantitative hand grasp and release test for patients with tetraplegia using a hand neuroprosthesis

    J Hand Surg

    (1994)
  • AA Freehafer et al.

    New concepts on treatment of the upper limb in the tetraplegic: surgical restoration and functional neuromuscular stimulation

    Hand Clin

    (1988)
  • M Parsonage et al.

    Neuralgic amyotrophy

  • E Moberg

    Surgical rehabilitation of the upper limb in tetraplegia

    Paraplegia

    (1990)
  • AA Freehafer et al.

    Planning tendon transfers in tetraplegia: “cleveland technique”

  • A Freehafer et al.

    Tendon transfers to improve grasp after injuries of the cervical spinal cord

    J Bone Joint Surg

    (1974)
  • DW Lamb et al.

    Surgical reconstruction of the upper limb in traumatic tetraplegia

  • MJ Mulcahey et al.

    Outcomes of upper extremity tendon transfers and occupational therapy in a child with a spinal cord injury

    Am J Occup Ther

    (1995)
  • J House

    Reconstruction of the thumb following spinal cord injury

    Clin Orthop

    (1985)
  • E Moberg

    Surgical treatment for absent single-hand grip and elbow extension in quadriplegia: principles and preliminary experience

    J Bone Joint Surg

    (1975)
  • K Mohammed et al.

    Upper limb surgery for tetraplegia

    J Bone Joint Surg

    (1992)
  • AA Freehafer et al.

    Transfer of the brachioradialis to improve wrist extension in high spinal cord injury

    J Bone Joint Surg

    (1967)
  • Cited by (66)

    • Assessment of the upper limb of the tetraplegic patient

      2022, Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Variability in units of measurement. Variability in testing conditions: recommendations from the American Association for Hand Surgery are only followed in some studies (measurements taken with the arm in adduction, elbow 90°, neutral pronation–supination of the forearm) [13]. Some authors also specify the exact position of the wrist, elbow, and shoulder.

    • Upper Limb Orthoses for Persons With Spinal Cord Injuries and Brachial Plexus Injuries

      2018, Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices, Fifth Edition
    • Spinal cord injuries in children and adolescents

      2012, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Objectives of surgical reconstruction of the upper extremities may include restoration of elbow extension, wrist extension, finger extension and flexion, and thumb pinch. For young people with C5 or weak C6 lesions who would not be candidates for reconstructive surgery, implantable functional electrical stimulation (FES) systems have been used to restore grasp and release (Mulcahey et al., 1997). Similar to adults with SCI, the Freehand System® in adolescents improved satisfaction and independence but, unfortunately was removed from the market (Mulcahey, 1996b).

    • Functional Electrical Stimulation

      2009, Spinal Cord Injuries: Management and Rehabilitation
    • Management of the Upper Limb in Individuals with Tetraplegia

      2009, Spinal Cord Injuries: Management and Rehabilitation
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

    View full text