Major reviewRetinal Prosthesis for the Blind
Section snippets
Psychophysical Experiments
There is a general consensus that electrical stimulation of the visual pathways via a small number of electrodes cannot be expected to provide unaided understanding of visual information. In an effort to define the minimum acceptable resolution for useful vision, several psychophysical experiments were performed. As early as 1965, it was suggested that 600 points of stimulation (pixels) would be sufficient for reading ordinary print.14 Others suggested that 80–120 points are sufficient for
Surface cortical electrodes
One of the earliest experiments included three blind patients, two of whom were able to locate a light source by scanning the visual field with a photocell. The photocell output electrically stimulated the cortex via electrodes in a wire passing through the scalp and skull and penetrating the visual cortex.25
Brindley and Lewin performed key experiments in this field by implanting devices consisting of 80 electrodes on the visual cortex of blind patients (Fig. 1). Wires through a burr hole
Retinal Prostheses
During the early seventies it became clear that blind humans can also perceive electrically elicited phosphenes in response to ocular stimulation, with a contact lens as a stimulating electrode.107, 108, 109 When obtainable, these electrically elicited responses indicated the presence of at least some functioning inner retinal cells. Because a number of blinding retinal diseases are due predominantly to outer retinal (in particular photoreceptor) degeneration,72, 127, 142 the idea of
Optic Nerve Prostheses
Investigators have also stimulated the optic nerve.133, 134, 153 The optic nerve is a compact compartment of ganglion cell axons running from the retina and synapse on the lateral geniculate body. This condensed cable can be reached surgically, and theoretically has a good location for implanting a surface or penetrating stimulation electrode array. However, the high density of the axons (1.2 million within a 2 mm-diameter cylindrical structure) could make it difficult to achieve focal
Sensory Substitution Devices
As an alternative to direct stimulation of the visual system neurons, several other approaches have attempted to convert visual information into vibro-tactile or auditory signals (i.e., sensory substitution devices12, 115). The distinct advantage of these approaches is that the device is wearable and not implantable. However, these devices have never reached widespread acceptance because they do not restore the sensation of vision, have low resolution, occupy another sensory modality, can evoke
Summary
The three levels of hierarchy in the sensory systems (i.e., receptor organ, sensory pathways, and perception) suggest a similar architecture for artificial and prosthetic sensory systems. Accordingly, artificial systems should include a transducer corresponding to the receptor organ, an encoder corresponding to the sensory processing system, and finally an interpreter corresponding to perceptual functions. In other words, the visual environment will be captured and processed by a photosensing
Method of Literature Search
A literature search of the PubMed data was performed (1966–present). The following key words were used: artificial vision, blindness, cortical prosthesis, electrical stimulation electronic implants, macular degeneration, optic nerve, optic nerve prosthesis, retina, retinal prosthesis, retinitis pigmentosa, visual cortex and visual prosthesis. In addtion, some abstracts from relevant recent conferences and annual meetings were reviewed. The search was not limited to English language, but only
Outline
I. General considerations
A. Efficacy of a visual prosthesis
1. Psychophysical experiments
2. Neuronal electrical excitation
a. Threshold parameters for electrical stimulation
3. Electrodes
4. Power supply
B. Safety of electrical stimulation
1. Damage caused by electrical current
2. Infection and inflammation
3. Heat damage
4. Hermetic sealing of the electronics
II. Cortical prosthesis
A. Surface cortical electrodes
B. Intracortical microstimulation
III. Retinal prostheses
A. Epiretinal prostheses
1. In vitro
Acknowledgements
The manuscript was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation #BES9810914, National Eye Institute #R209EY11888, Second Sight/NIH-NEI #R24EY12893-01, Foundation Fighting Blindness, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Office of Naval Research: Tissue Based Biosensors Program, The Whitaker Foundation, and The Alfred E. Mann Fund at the Applied Physics Laboratory. The authors wish to thank Rhonda Grebe, Terry Shelley, Salvatore A. D'Anna, and Devon C. Ginther, for their
References (171)
- et al.
Histopathologic evaluation of prolonged intracortical electrical stimulation
Experimental Neurology
(1986) - et al.
A model for electrical stimulation of central myelinated fibers with monopolar electrodes
Exp Neurol
(1969) - et al.
Electrical stimulation of the nervous systemthe principle of safe charge injection with noble metal electrodes
Bioelectrochem Bioenerg
(1975) - et al.
A microelectrode for delivery of defined charge densities
J Neurosci Methods
(1983) - et al.
Prevalence of retinitis pigmentosa in Maine
Am J Ophthalmol
(1984) - et al.
Mobility performance with a pixelized vision system
Vision Res
(1992) - et al.
Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina
Neurosci Lett
(1997) - et al.
Retinal transplants into the anterior chamber of the rat eye
Neuroscience
(1987) - et al.
Epidemics of postoperative wound infections associated with hair carriers
Lancet
(1973) - et al.
Multi-electrode stimulation and recording in the isolated retina
J Neurosci Methods
(2000)