Trends in Neurosciences
Volume 22, Issue 12, 1 December 1999, Pages 561-567
Journal home page for Trends in Neurosciences

Review
Long-term potentiation in the amygdala: a mechanism for emotional learning and memory

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01465-4Get rights and content

Abstract

In the mammalian brain, LTP is an enduring form of synaptic plasticity that is posited to have a role in learning and memory. Compelling new evidence for this view derives from studies of LTP in the amygdala, a brain structure that is essential for simple forms of emotional learning and memory, such as Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats. More specifically, antagonists of the NMDA receptor block both amygdaloid LTP induction and fear conditioning, fear conditioning induces increases in amygdaloid synaptic transmission that resemble LTP, and genetic modifications that disrupt amygdaloid LTP eliminate fear conditioning. Collectively, these results provide the most-convincing evidence to date that LTP mediates learning and memory in mammals.

Section snippets

Neural circuitry of fear conditioning

It has been recognized for decades that the amygdala is involved in emotional processes7, including aversively motivated learning8, 9 (see Ref. 10 for an excellent review of amygdaloid anatomy). The major amygdaloid nuclei and projections are shown in Fig. 1. Recent anatomical and behavioral evidence indicates that there are at least two distinct subsystems within the amygdala that are important for Pavlovian fear conditioning11, 12. The first subsystem of the amygdala consists of the lateral,

Fear memories are formed and stored in the basolateral amygdala

Much evidence indicates that the BLA is the crucial neural locus for the formation and storage of fear memories. Selective lesions of the BLA abolish both acquisition and expression of conditional fear in several behavioral paradigms27, 28. In addition, BLA lesions yield deficits in conditional fear when they are made up to one month after training29, 30 or after extensive overtraining31. Similar to permanent lesions, manipulations that temporarily disable amygdaloid neurons prevent both the

Amygdaloid neurons exhibit LTP

The first examination of synaptic plasticity in the amygdala was performed by Racine and colleagues in awake, behaving rats. In this preparation, ‘tetanic’ LTP (which is contrasted with ‘behavioral’ LTP) was induced in the amygdala by applying high-frequency electrical stimulation to the pyriform cortex41. This LTP consisted of a long-term enhancement in the amplitude of stimulus-elicited extracellular field potentials recorded in the amygdala. More recently, tetanic LTP has been reported in

Glutamate receptors in the amygdala are essential for fear conditioning

The important role for glutamate receptors in amygdaloid LTP suggests a role for these receptors in the acquisition and expression of Pavlovian fear conditioning. Consistent with this view, several laboratories have now demonstrated that the infusion of NMDA-receptor antagonists, such as (±)-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV), into the BLA prevents the acquisition of conditional fear responses, including freezingr53, 54, 55 and fear-potentiated startle56, 57. Moreover, it has been reported

Fear conditioning induces LTP in the amygdala

The ability of NMDA-receptor antagonists to block both the induction of tetanic LTP in the amygdala and the acquisition of fear conditioning suggests that a process akin to tetanic LTP might underlie the acquisition of conditional fear in awake, behaving rats. Two recent studies are consistent with this possibility. In the first study, LeDoux and colleagues found that fear conditioning in response to an auditory CS enhanced auditory-elicited potentials in the BLA in a manner that was similar to

Molecular basis of amygdaloid LTP and fear conditioning

A novel and exciting approach to examining the relationship between synaptic plasticity mechanisms, and learning and memory involves the use of genetically modified animals. In the past few years, many mice have been engineered with genetic manipulations that either disable or eliminate key proteins in the intracellular biochemical cascades that mediate LTP. While these studies have largely focused on the relationship of hippocampal LTP to behavior, several recent investigations using

Associative LTP as a mechanism for Pavlovian fear conditioning

If LTP in the amygdala is a synaptic mechanism for the acquisition of conditional fear, then it is of interest to consider how such a mechanism might operate during learning. In the hippocampus, tetanic LTP exhibits a property known as associativity (for example, see Ref. 71). Thus, LTP can be induced in ‘weak’ synaptic pathways if activity in these pathways is paired with activity in a ‘strong’ pathway. This associative property of LTP can accommodate CS–US association formation in the

Concluding remarks

An abundance of evidence indicates that neurons in the amygdala are essential for simple forms of emotional learning and memory, such as Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats. In the amygdala, LTP is an enduring form of synaptic plasticity that has been posited to have a role in Pavlovian fear conditioning. As this article illustrates, this view is supported by compelling new evidence that NMDA-receptor antagonists block both amygdaloid LTP induction and fear conditioning, fear conditioning

Acknowledgements

The author’s research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (R29MH57865). The author thanks two anonymous referees for helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript.

References (77)

  • J. LeDoux

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (1998)
  • L.W. Swanson et al.

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • M. Davis

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1994)
  • S. Maren

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1997)
  • J. Iwata

    Brain Res.

    (1987)
  • B.S. Kapp

    Brain Res.

    (1982)
  • G.J. Quirk

    Neuron

    (1995)
  • S. Maren

    Brain Res.

    (1991)
  • J.P. Pascoe et al.

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1985)
  • G.J. Quirk

    Neuron

    (1997)
  • S. Maren et al.

    Neuron

    (1996)
  • R.J. Racine

    Brain Res.

    (1983)
  • M.T. Rogan et al.

    Neuron

    (1995)
  • S. Maren et al.

    Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.

    (1995)
  • Y.Y. Huang et al.

    Neuron

    (1998)
  • M. Kim

    Behav. Neural Biol.

    (1993)
  • M.E. Bach

    Cell

    (1995)
  • M. Davis

    J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci.

    (1997)
  • M.S. Fanselow

    Psychonomic Bull. Rev.

    (1994)
  • S. Maren

    Mol. Neurobiol.

    (1996)
  • J.L. McGaugh

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1996)
  • M. Gallagher et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1994)
  • H. Kluver et al.

    Am. J. Physiol.

    (1937)
  • J.V. Brady

    J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.

    (1954)
  • M.H. Kellicutt et al.

    Psychol. Rep.

    (1963)
  • J.E. LeDoux

    Annu. Rev. Psych.

    (1995)
  • S. Campeau et al.

    J. Neurosci.

    (1995)
  • J.E. LeDoux

    J. Neurosci.

    (1990)
  • L.M. Romanski et al.

    J. Neurosci.

    (1992)
  • J.J. Kim et al.

    Science

    (1992)
  • R.G. Phillips et al.

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1992)
  • J.B. Rosen

    J. Neurosci.

    (1992)
  • C. Shi et al.

    J. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • L.M. Romanski

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1993)
  • J. Hitchcock et al.

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1986)
  • M. Kim et al.

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1993)
  • J.E. LeDoux

    J. Neurosci.

    (1988)
  • S. Campeau et al.

    J. Neurosci.

    (1995)
  • Cited by (357)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text