Traveling fronts and wave propagation failure in an inhomogeneous neural network

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(01)00266-4Get rights and content

Abstract

We use averaging and homogenization theory to study the propagation of traveling wavefronts in an inhomogeneous excitable neural medium. Motivated by the functional architecture of primary visual cortex, we model the inhomogeneity as a periodic modulation in the long-range neuronal connections. We derive an expression for the effective wavespeed and show that propagation failure can occur if the speed is too slow or the degree of inhomogeneity is too large. We find that there are major qualitative differences in the wavespeed for different choices of the homogenized weight distribution.

Introduction

A common starting point for analyzing the large-scale dynamics of cortex is to treat nerve tissue as a continuous two-dimensional medium and to describe the dynamics in terms of Wilson–Cowan equations of the form [1], [2], [3]τ0∂u(x,t)∂t=−u(x,t)+−∞ŵ(x,x′)f(u(x′,t))dx′+I(x,t).The scalar field u(x,t) represents the local activity of a population of excitatory neurons at cortical position x∈R2 at time t, τ0 is a time constant (associated with membrane leakage currents or synaptic currents), I(x,t) is an external input, and the positive distribution ŵ(x,x′) is the strength of connections from neurons at x′ to neurons at x. (Populations of inhibitory neurons can be incorporated into Eq. (1.1) by taking u to be a vector-valued field and replacing w by a matrix of distributions with both positive and negative components.) The nonlinearity f is often assumed to be a smooth monotonically increasing function of the formf(u)=11+e−β(u−α),where β is the gain parameter and α the threshold. This becomes a step function in the high-gain limit β→∞, i.e., f(u)=Θ(uα), where Θ(x)=1, if x>0 and is zero otherwise.

A major simplification concerning the structure of cortex is to assume that it is homogeneous and isotropic, with the strength of connections depending on the (Euclidean) distance between presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons. More specifically, ŵ(x,x′)=w(∣x−x′∣) with w(s) a decreasing function of separation s. Under this approximation the weight distribution is invariant with respect to the Euclidean group of rigid body motions in the plane. Euclidean symmetry plays a key role in determining the types of solutions that can be generated spontaneously in such networks [4], [5].

Another important property of homogeneous networks is that they support traveling waves in the form of propagating fronts separating regions of high and low activity [6], [7]. This is of interest since a number of experimental studies have observed waves of excitation propagating in cortical slices (typically from rat somatosensory cortex) when stimulated appropriately [8], [9], [10]. The propagation velocity of such waves is of order 0.06ms−1, which is much slower than the typical speed of 0.5ms−1 found for action potential propagation along axons. It is possible that the conditions for wave propagation in the intact cortex are different since much of the long-range cortical connectivity is lost during slice preparation. On the other hand, traveling waves of electrical activity have also been observed in vivo in the somatosensory cortex of behaving rats [11], turtle and mollusk olfactory bulbs [12], [13], turtle cortex [14] and visuomotor cortices in cat [15]. Often these traveling waves are found to occur during periods without sensory stimulation with the subsequent presentation of a stimulus inducing a switch to synchronous oscillatory behavior [16]. Hence, determining the conditions under which cortical wave propagation occurs could be important for understanding the processing of sensory stimuli as well as more pathological forms of behavior such as epileptic seizures and migraines.

The dependence of wave velocity on the underlying pattern of synaptic connectivity has been analyzed in the case of homogeneous networks [7], [17], [18]. However, certain care must be taken in interpreting these results, since traveling wave solutions are sensitive to the degree of homogeneity in the connectivity pattern, particularly in the case of slowly moving waves. This is a consequence of the fact that traveling wavefronts are not structurally stable solutions, i.e., they correspond to heteroclinic orbits of an equivalent dynamical system.1 Keener [19], [20] has recently explored this issue within the context of reaction–diffusion equations modeling excitable chemical media. Using a careful application of averaging or homogenization theory, he has shown that if the level of non-uniformity is sufficiently large or the wave velocity is sufficiently small then propagation failure can occur.

In this paper, we extend the analysis of Keener [19], [20] to the case of wave propagation in inhomogeneous neural networks. Our work is motivated by the fact that although the assumption of cortical homogeneity is reasonable at the macroscopic level, there are additional structures at the microscopic level that could modify this simple picture (see Section 2.) For example, in the case of the primary visual cortex (V1) there are a number of functional maps superimposed on the underlying retinotopic representation of the visual field [21], [22]. These maps, which correspond to additional cortical labels such as ocular dominance and orientation preference, introduce an approximate periodic tiling of the cortical plane whose wavelength is comparable to a single hyperecolumn spacing of around 1 mm (in cats and monkeys). It is likely that such functional periodicity is associated with a corresponding periodicity in the anatomy. Within the framework of large-scale cortical models (1.1), the periodic microstructure of the cortex can be incorporated by taking a weight distribution2ŵ(x,x′)=w(∣x−x′∣)h∣x−x′∣εkx′ε,where h,k are 2π-periodic functions and ε determines the microscopic length-scale. If k=1, then the cortex still acts like a homogeneous medium with the effective connection strength a periodically modulated function of spatial separation. On the other hand, if there are inhomogeneities arising from the microscopic level then these will result in a periodically heterogeneous medium for which k≠1. Absorbing the factor h into w and substituting into Eq. (1.1) gives the inhomogeneous evolution equation (for zero external inputs)τ0∂u(x,t)∂t=−u(x,t)+−∞w(∣x−x′∣)kx′εf(u(x′,t))dx′.

The main goal of this paper is to determine the behavior of propagating wavefronts in a one-dimensional version of Eq. (1.4) by extending the averaging method of Keener [19], [20] to the case of integro-differential equations. This generates an analytical expression for the wavespeed and waveform shape, from which it can be deduced that propagation failure occurs when the medium is sufficiently inhomogeneous (see Section 3). An explicit calculation of the wavespeed is then carried out in the case of piecewise linear dynamics (see Section 4). We show that the ε-dependence of solutions is sensitive to the choice of weight distribution w. In particular, there are major qualitative differences between exponential and Gaussian weight distributions due to the fact that in the latter case there are transcendentally small (non-perturbative) ε-dependent contributions to the wavespeed. Interestingly, such terms only occur for smooth nonlinearities in the models considered by Keener [19], [20].

Section snippets

Is the cortex a homogeneous medium?

The most basic feature of the functional architecture of V1 is an orderly retinotopic mapping of the visual field onto the surface of cortex, with the left and right halves of visual field mapped onto the right and left cortices, respectively. Superimposed upon this retinotopic map are a number of additional functional maps that each have an approximately periodic structure [22].

  • 1.

    Ocular dominance. Cells tend to respond more strongly to stimuli presented in one eye than in the other, and are said

Averaging theory and homogenization

In this section, we analyze wavefront propagation and its failure in a one-dimensional inhomogeneous network evolving according to Eq. (1.4). It is convenient to set k(x/ε)=1+A′(x/ε), where A′ is a 2π-periodic function and x∈R so that the evolution equation takes the form (for τ0=1)∂u(x,t)∂t=−u(x,t)+−∞w(x−x′)1+A′x′εf(u(x′,t))dx′.We shall assume that ε is a small parameter such that the periodic modulation occurs on a smaller length-scale than the correlation length of w(x). (This is valid if

Calculation of average wavespeed

In this section, we calculate the average wavespeed and the conditions for wave propagation failure in the special case of the step-function nonlinearity f(u)=Θ(uα). Although f is not itself continuously differentiable, it can be obtained as the high-gain limit β→∞ of the smooth function (1.2). The advantage of using a threshold nonlinearity is that all calculations can be carried out explicitly. Moreover, when β is finite it is necessary to develop the perturbation expansion of Eq. (3.8) to O

Discussion

In this paper, we have shown that even a weak heterogeneity can have a dramatic effect on wave propagation in an excitable neural medium. If the wavefront solution of the corresponding homogenized system is sufficiently slow then propagation failure can occur. Our work was motivated in part by the observation that there is an approximate periodic microstructure in primary visual cortex that could support a heterogeneous periodic modulation in the long-range connections between neurons. Whether

References (47)

  • R.D. Chervin et al.

    Periodicity and directionality in the propagation of epileptiform discharges across neocortex

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1988)
  • D. Golomb et al.

    Propagating neuronal discharges in neocortical slices: computational and experimental study

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1997)
  • J-Y. Wu et al.

    Propagating activation during oscillations and evoked responses in neocortical slices

    J. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • M.A.L. Nicolelis et al.

    Sensorimotor encoding by synchronous neural ensemble activity at multiple levels of the somatosensory system

    Science

    (1995)
  • D. Kleinfeld et al.

    Dynamics of propagating waves in the olfactory network of a terrestrial mollusk: am electrical and optical study

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1994)
  • Y.-W. Lam, L.B. Cohen, M. Wachowiak, M.R. Zochowski, Odors elicit three different oscillations in the turtle olfactory...
  • J.C. Prechtl et al.

    Visual stimuli induce waves of electrical activity in turtle cortex

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1997)
  • P.R. Roelfsema et al.

    Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas

    Nature

    (1997)
  • G.B. Ermentrout

    The analysis of synaptically generated traveling waves

    J. Comp. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • P.C. Bressloff

    Traveling waves and pulses in a one-dimensional network of integrate-and-fire neurons

    J. Math. Biol.

    (2000)
  • J.P. Keener, Propagation of waves in an excitable medium with discrete release sites, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 61 (2000)...
  • K. Obermayer et al.

    Geometry of orientation and ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex

    J. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • N.V. Swindale

    The development of topography in visual cortex: a review of models

    Network

    (1996)
  • Cited by (119)

    • Single bumps in a 2-population homogenized neuronal network model

      2018, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena
      Citation Excerpt :

      A characteristic feature of the homogenized neural field model (3) (as well as in the works [17–21]) is the appearance of the double convolution integrals of the type (4) describing the nonlocal effects. We notice here that there is a notable structural difference between the homogenized neural field models in these works (as well as the model (3)) and in the papers [10–16]). Here the following should be noted: First of all, we have not seen a derivation of the modelling frameworks like (3) and the homogenized 1-population models investigated in [17–21] by using standard perturbation techniques.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text