Sensation seeking and startle modulation by physically threatening images
Introduction
Sensation seeking is a dimension of personality referring to both an individual's need for sensory stimulation and the level of risk taken in an effort to satisfy the need for such stimulation (Zuckerman, 1994). It has been found to buffer individuals from stress associated with physically threatening events such as sports-related injury (Smith et al., 1992) and skydiving (Breivik et al., 1998). Additionally, sensation seeking has been found to play a stress-buffering role for individuals enduring military combat. For example, Solomon et al. (1995) found lower rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and less severe psychiatric symptomatology among high relative to low sensation-seeking Israeli POWs of the Yom Kippur War (Solomon et al., 1995). Similarly, in a reanalysis requested by the current authors, Orr et al. (1990) found a significant negative correlation (−0.32) between the thrill and adventure seeking subscale (TAS) of the sensation seeking scale (SSS) and trait anxiety among Vietnam veterans (S.P. Orr, personal communication, May 11, 1999) indicating lower levels of post-war trait anxiety among those higher on the TAS subscale.
The factors responsible for the potential stress-buffering function of sensation seeking remain relatively unstudied. One possibility is that high sensation seekers are less anxiously reactive to physical threat, which in turn facilitates resilient adaptation. This idea is supported by several studies demonstrating inverse relations between sensation seeking and self-reported anxious reactivity to physically risky activities and situations (Blankstein, 1975, Franken et al., 1992, Segal, 1973, Zuckerman, 1979). This idea is also consistent with findings that high relative to low sensation seekers are less responsive to appeals for safe sex and drug prevention that include threatening health information for persuasive purposes (Schoenbachler and Whittler, 1996, Witte and Morrison, 1995). The above studies provide correlational support for an inverse relationship between sensation seeking and anxious reactivity to threat. The current study aims to investigate experimentally this relationship using the affective modulation of startle paradigm (Vrana et al., 1988).
Affective modulation of startle refers to the tendency for negative affective states (e.g. anxiety and disgust) and positive affective states (e.g. joy and lust) to potentiate and attenuate the startle response, respectively. Such modulation of the startle blink has been obtained by presenting positive, neutral, or negative pictures from a standardized collection of images known as the International Affective Picture System (Lang et al., 1988) to subjects just prior to the onset of an auditory startle stimulus (for a review, see Bradley et al., 1999). Given that startle is augmented best by physically threatening IAPS images (Balaban and Taussig, 1994), potentiated-startle may be a particularly sensitive index of emotional reactivity to threat, making affective startle modulation an ideal paradigm for the research question at hand.
The potentiation elicited by negatively-valenced stimuli has been understood as a fear reaction and has, therefore, been referred to as fear-potentiated startle (e.g. Grillon et al., 1993, Grillon and Ameli, 2001). Evidence for this interpretation comes from studies showing that potentiation of startle resulting from negative stimuli in humans is attenuated by diazepam, an anxiolytic drug (Bitsios et al., 1999, Patrick et al., 1996). Similarly in animal studies, rats administered drugs that decrease anxiety in humans (e.g. diazepam and flurazepam) display reduced levels of fear-potentiated startle, and rats administered drugs that increase anxiety in humans (e.g. piperoxan and yohimbine) show elevated levels of fear-potentiated startle (Davis, 1979, Davis et al., 1979). Finally, fear-potentiated startle has been blocked following lesions of amygdala-based “fear” circuits in both animal (Hitchcock and Davis, 1986) and human studies (Angrilli et al., 1996). Due to the aforementioned evidence, potentiation of startle by threatening IAPS images in low and high sensation seekers is conceptualized as a measure of anxious reactivity to threat.
Because of findings pointing to the importance of the TAS for determining emotional and perceptual reactions to threatening stimuli (Franken et al., 1992, Orr et al., 1990) and because anxious reactivity to hypothetical situations of physical harm is negatively related to the TAS subscale of the SSS more than to any other of its subscales (Blankstein, 1975, Zuckerman, 1979), we were particularly interested in comparing startle potentiation to threatening images across high and low sensation seekers with extreme high and low TAS scores, respectively. In addition to presenting neutral and threateningly valenced slides, we also presented positive slides, as is typically done in studies of affective modulation of startle (Bradley et al., 1990).
In addition to studying the effects of sensation seeking on the fear-potentiating aspect of the startle blink, the current experiment investigated the relationship between sensation seeking and both startle-blink thresholds (i.e. lowest intensity at which startle, unaccompanied by affective modulation, is elicited) and basal startle-blink magnitude (i.e. magnitudes of startle unaccompanied by affective modulation).
Graham (1979) has distinguished between three types of psychophysiological reflexes: (a) orienting reflexes, (b) defensive reflexes, and (c) startle reflexes. Although several studies have investigated the relationship between sensation seeking and both the orienting reflex (e.g. Neary and Zuckerman, 1976, Smith et al., 1986, Stelmack et al., 1983) and the defensive reflex (e.g. Cox, 1977, Orlebeke and Feij, 1979, Zuckerman et al., 1988), no studies to our knowledge have investigated the relationship between sensation seeking and the unmodulated startle-response (Hutchison et al., 1999, examined relations between prepulse modulation of startle and sensation-seeking but reported no unmodulated startle results).
Startle has been conceptualized as a reflex occurring when an organism experiences sudden sensory overload (e.g. Braff, 1978, Reijmers and Peeters, 1994). Because high sensation seekers are thought to have higher optimal levels of stimulation than low sensation seekers (Zuckerman, 1969), a level of stimulation considered optimal by high sensation seekers will exceed the optimal level of stimulation of low sensation seekers, thereby creating a state of sensory overload among low but not high sensation seekers. As such, less stimulation may be required by lows for a startle response to be initiated. This hypothesis was tested by examining the lowest dB level of an acoustic probe needed to elicit a startle response across groups.
In rats, the phenomenon of fear-potentiated startle has been shown to involve amygdala-based circuits, whereas the unmodulated startle blink does not (Davis et al., 1987). If sensation-seeking influences affective modulation of startle, this influence may not extend to the basic startle response. To examine this question, we investigated whether high and low sensation seekers differ in basal startle-blink magnitude in addition to measuring levels of affective startle-modulation.
In summary, the aim of the experiment was to establish high and low sensation seeking groups (with special emphasis on TAS) and to run them on three procedures: startle threshold measurement, ten trials of baseline startle, and affective modulation of startle using IAPS pictures. Directional hypotheses were made for the affective modulation of startle component with threatening compared with neutral images expected to engender more potentiation of startle in low relative to high sensation seekers. Additionally, low compared with high sensation seekers were predicted to have lower thresholds for acoustic startle. The question of group differences in basal startle was exploratory in nature and thus no predictions were made a priori.
Section snippets
Participants
A total of 193 university students recruited from the departmental participant pool were screened for levels of sensation seeking. Students who scored a total of 21 or higher on the sensation seeking scale-form V (SSS-V) as well as an 8 or higher on the TAS subscale of the SSS-V were considered high sensation seekers, and students who scored a total SSS-V score of 20 or lower and a TAS subscale score of 3 or lower were classified as low sensation seekers. Of the screened students, 16 low
Results
Group membership criteria produced groups with higher overall sensation seeking scores for high versus low sensation seekers (P<0.001), as well as higher TAS scores for high versus low sensation seekers (P<0.001). Additionally, high sensation seekers were substantially higher than were lows on the ES and DIS subscales (P<0.01 for all). The two groups were not, however, markedly different on BS (P>0.05), and both had fairly low mean scores for this subscale (see Table 1). The results concerning
Discussion
It should be reiterated that high and low sensation seekers were defined in this study as those scoring particularly high and low on the TAS subscale. As a result, findings may be said to relate to only a subset of high and low sensation seekers, namely those who are particularly high and low on the TAS subscale.
As predicted, sensation-seeking moderated levels of fear-potentiated startle such that subjects high on both the TAS subscale and the total SSS-V displayed less fear-potentiation of
Conclusion
Previous studies suggest a stress buffering role for sensation seeking in the face of physical threat. Given the current results suggesting less anxious reactivity to threatening images among high versus low sensation seekers, it is plausible that reduced anxious reactivity to threat plays a central role in the stress-buffering function of sensation seeking. Of note, startle attenuation was not elicited by positive images among high or low sensation seekers suggesting that positive images
Acknowledgements
We thank Carla Donnarumma and Karen Muzio for their assistance with recruitment and data entry, Robert and Mike Soltz for their technical assistance with the experimental apparatus, William Dycus for his help with computer programming, Ernest Hodges for his helpful comments, and those who kindly volunteered to participate in the study.
References (64)
- et al.
Salience of fear/threat in the affective modulation of the human startle blink
Biological Psychology
(1994) Two scales for the assessment of personality disorder in antisocial populations
Personality and Individual Differences
(1987)- et al.
Personality, psychological states and heart rate in novice and expert parachutists
Personality and Individual Differences
(1998) - et al.
Personality and affective modulation of the startle reflex
Personality and Individual Differences
(1995) - et al.
Fear potentiated startle: a neural and pharmacological analysis
Behavior Brain Research
(1993) - et al.
Sensation seeking and the tendency to view the world as threatening
Personality and Individual Differences
(1992) - et al.
Fear-potentiated startle: relationship to the level of state/trait anxiety in healthy subjects
Biological Psychiatry
(1993) - et al.
Effects of acoustic prepulses on the startle reflex in rats: a parametric analysis
Brain Research
(1994) - et al.
Sensation seeking: differential effects of relevant novel stimulation on electrodermal activity
Personality and Individual Differences
(1986) - et al.
Extraversion, sensation seeking and electrodermal response: probing a paradox
Personality and Individual Differences
(1983)