Correlations and dissociations between BOLD signal and P300 amplitude in an auditory oddball task: a parametric approach to combining fMRI and ERP
Introduction
The oddball paradigm, in which a distinct -target- stimulus is presented infrequently and at random intervals within a series of frequent -regular- stimuli, has been extensively investigated since it was described by Sutton in 1965. The brain activity elicited can be detected with electrical recordings from the scalp. The P300 is the characteristic endogenous positive wave, arising between 260 and 500 ms after the onset of each rare stimulus, that is more prominent over the centro-parietal region of the scalp [1]. Changes in the latency of the P300 have been associated, among other factors, with aging, psychiatric disorders, task difficulty and memory performance [2], [3]. Changes in the magnitude of the P300 have been related to the experimental conditions as well as to specific changes in information processing by the brain due to experimental manipulation or changes in attention level. In particular, it has been shown that sequence [4] and probability of occurrence of the target stimuli [5], [6], [7] have an effect on the amplitude of the P300. The amplitude of the P300 increases as the probability of occurrence of the oddball decreases. Recently, it has been argued that the differences are not due to probability but rather to target-to-target interval [8].
Despite the good temporal characterization of the electrical response to the oddball paradigm, it is not clear where this potential is generated in the brain. Electrocortical recordings [9], [10] and lesion studies [11] have suggested that temporal, parietal and frontal regions, as well as limbic structures, are involved in the P300 generation.
In recent years, fMRI has developed as a powerful tool for localizing brain activation. Studies conducted by our group and others [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] agree upon the involvement of parietal areas, particularly supramarginal gyrus, in the response to the oddball task. Depending on modality (i.e., visual or auditory stimuli) or response type (button press or silent counting) some other regions, including frontal and temporal areas and cingulate cortex, have also been reported as activated by the oddball paradigm.
ERP and fMRI data have complementary abilities to describe brain function, with different temporal and spatial resolutions, and there is considerable interest in better understanding how neuronal electrical activity may be related to the hemodynamic and metabolic changes seen in imaging. Thus, the purpose of this work was to explore the correlations and dissociations between the amplitude of the P300 wave and changes in Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) fMRI signals. During these experiments, we changed the frequency of occurrence of the oddball stimuli in four steps. We kept constant the intensity of the stimuli and the inter-stimulus interval throughout the experiment and explored which brain regions were affected by the experimental manipulation. The parallel changes in ERP and fMRI signal in such a parametric design provides a novel method for connecting these two different modalities.
Section snippets
Subjects
Seven healthy subjects (average age = 27 years, range = 21–37 years, 2 females) participated in this study, having previously provided their informed consent in accordance with a protocol reviewed and approved by the Human Investigation Committee of Yale University School of Medicine.
Stimulus presentation
Computer-generated auditory stimuli were presented to the subjects every 1.5 s using the shareware software: “PsyScope” (Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University) and “SoundSculptorII.” The frequent
ERP
All subjects showed a P300 response to the oddball stimulus. The activity was more prominent over the centro-parietal area (Fig. 3a).
There was a significant effect of probability of oddball (F(3,18) = 3.936, p < 0.046 Greenhouse-Geisser corrected for sphericity) and also a significant linear contrast effect (within subject, TTI level: F(1,6) = 8.052, p < 0.030; electrode: F(1,6) = 12.009, p < 0.013). The TTI effect was more significant at electrode Fz (F(3,18) = 4.452 p < 0.030
Discussion
The results obtained for the electrical recording agree with those of Duncan-Johnson [7] and others. As expected, the P300 was more prominent in the centro-parietal electrodes, being maximum at Pz, and it increased in amplitude as the oddball became less frequent. The electrode affected the most by the experimental manipulation was Fz. The observed effect was small. Picton reviewed the TTI effect as reported in the literature [2] and showed a small increase in amplitude as the TTI increased for
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowledge Dr. M. Torello, Capital University, Columbus, OH, for useful discussions in the early stages of this work and T. Hickey and H. Serofin, Yale University, for their help in the fMRI experiments.
References (20)
- et al.
Cognitive and biological determinants of P300an integrative review
Biol Psychology
(1995) - et al.
Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. III. Frontal cortex
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
(1995) - et al.
Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
(1995) - et al.
Contributions of temporal parietal junction to the human auditory P3
Brain Res
(1989) - et al.
Event-related fMRI of auditory, and visual oddball tasks
Magn Reson Imag
(2000) - et al.
Measurements of the temporal fMRI response of the human auditory cortex to train of tones
NeuroImage
(1998) - et al.
ROC analysis of statistical methods used in functional MRIindividual subjects
NeuroImage
(1999) Surprise!… Surprise?. Presidential Address 1980
Psychophysiology
(1981)The P300 wave of the human event-related potential
J Clin Neurophysiology
(1992)- et al.
The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential
Science
(1976)
Cited by (138)
Reconfiguration of cortical brain network from searching to spotting for dynamic visual targets
2022, Journal of Neuroscience MethodsEEG and fMRI coupling and decoupling based on joint independent component analysis (jICA)
2022, Journal of Neuroscience MethodsA parcellation-based model of the auditory network
2020, Hearing ResearchFunctional MRI evidence of the cortico-olivary efferent pathway during active auditory target processing in humans
2019, Hearing ResearchCitation Excerpt :Attention can be directed by a saliency-driven bottom-up mechanism during the processing of external stimuli and a cognition-driven top-down control mechanism while performing a task (Buschman and Miller, 2007). Auditory target detection has been exploited and explored by a great multitude of studies, in auditory modality alone and in auditory-visual cross-modal paradigms, in healthy subjects and in various clinical populations, and by means of electroencephalography (EEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), or both (Amenedo and Dıaz, 1998; Beauchamp and Stelmack, 2006; Horovitz et al., 2002; Kiehl and Liddle, 2001; Kiehl et al., 2005; Kiehl et al., 2001; Liebenthal et al., 2003; Linden et al., 1999; Opitz et al., 1999; Smith et al., 1990; Stevens et al., 2000; Stevens et al., 2005). Several authors have observed that the processing of target stimuli evoked activity in extensive brain areas.