Neural basis of utility estimation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80008-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The allocation of behavior among competing activities and goal objects depends on the payoffs they provide. Payoff is evaluated among multiple dimensions, including intensity, rate, delay, and kind. Recent findings suggest that by triggering a stream of action potentials in myelinated, medial forebrain bundle axons, rewarding electrical brain stimulation delivers a meaningful intensity signal to the process that computes payoff.

References (76)

  • H Rachlin et al.

    Substitutability in time allocation

    Psychol Rev

    (1980)
  • RA Wise

    Addictive drugs and brain stimulation reward

    Annu Rev Neurosci

    (1996)
  • C Bielajew et al.

    Behaviorally derived measures of conduction velocity in the substrate for rewarding medial forebrain bundle stimulation

    Brain Res

    (1982)
  • P Shizgal et al.

    Behavioral methods for inferring anatomical linkage between rewarding brain stimulation sites

    J Comp Physiol Psychol

    (1980)
  • A Arvanitogiannis et al.

    Effects of excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain on MFB self-stimulation

    Physiol Behav

    (1996)
  • A Arvanitogiannis et al.

    Increased ipsilateral expression of Fos following lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation

    Brain Res

    (1996)
  • C Flores et al.

    Fos-like immunoreactivity in forebrain regions following self-stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus and the ventral tegmental area

    Behav Brain Res

    (1997)
  • B Murray et al.

    Physiological measures of conduction velocity and refractory period for putative reward-relevant MFB axons arising in the rostral MFB

    Physiol Behav

    (1996)
  • J Malette et al.

    Interhemispheric links in brain stimulation reward

    Behav Brain Res

    (1995)
  • JS Yeomans

    Electrically evoked behaviors: axons and synapses mapped with collision tests

    Behav Brain Res

    (1995)
  • JS Yeomans et al.

    Excitability properties of medial forebrain bundle axons of A9 and A10 dopamine cells

    Brain Res

    (1988)
  • RA Wise

    Action of drugs of abuse on brain reward systems

    Pharmacol Biochem Behav

    (1980)
  • CR Gallistel

    The role of the dopaminergic projections in MFB self-stimulation

    Behav Brain Res

    (1986)
  • O Kofman et al.

    Differential effects of atropine, procaine and dopamine in the rat ventral tegmentum on lateral hypothalamic rewarding brain stimulation

    Behav Brain Res

    (1990)
  • J Barth
  • J Bentham
  • KL Conover et al.

    Competition and summation between rewarding effect of sucrose and lateral hypothalamic stimulation in the rat

    Behav Neurosci

    (1994)
  • KL Conover et al.

    Effects of sodium depletion on competition and summation between rewarding effects of salt and lateral hypothalamic stimulation in the rat

    Behav Neurosci

    (1994)
  • KL Conover et al.

    Differential effects of postingestive feedback on the reward value of sucrose and lateral hypothalamic stimulation in the rat

    Behav Nuerosci

    (1994)
  • B Woodside et al.

    Administration of ovarian steroid hormones does not change the reward effectiveness of lateral hypothalamic stimulation in ovariectomized rats

    Psychobiology

    (1996)
  • EP Bless et al.

    The effects of gonadal steroids on brain stimulation reward in female rats

    Behav Brain Res

    (1997)
  • GC Abrahamsen et al.

    Curve-shift analysis of self-stimulation in food-restricted rats: relationships between daily meal, plasma corticosterone and reward sensitization

    Brain Res

    (1995)
  • JS Yeomans
    (1990)
  • JM Simmons et al.

    Saturation of subjective reward magnitude as a function of current and pulse frequency

    Behav Neurosci

    (1994)
  • GM Heyman et al.

    Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength

    J Exp Anal Behav

    (1994)
  • AL Hamilton et al.

    Reward, performance, and the response strength method in self-stimulating rats: validation and neuroleptics

    Physiol Behav

    (1985)
  • RJ Herrnstein

    Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement

    J Exp Anal Behav

    (1961)
  • RJ Herrnstein

    On the law of effect

    J Exp Anal Behav

    (1970)
  • Cited by (144)

    • The role of norepinephrine in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia

      2020, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    • Valence processing differs across stimulus modalities

      2018, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has been suggested that the medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) – the most ventral part of the mPFC – integrates multimodal sensory information and is the most likely area in the brain to mediate valence processing for stimuli originating from different sensory modalities (Kringelbach, 2005). This idea of a common neuronal brain region or network for neuronal processing of valence across stimulus modalities is shared by Montague & Berns' predictor-valuation model (Montague and Berns, 2002) and Shizgal’ utility estimation model (Shizgal, 1997). These models argue that the value of multimodal stimuli is converted into a common scale (or currency) allowing the organism to compare their value or ‘utility’ to guide future behaviors (Grabenhorst et al., 2010; Montague and Berns, 2002).

    • It's all in the type of the task: Dopamine modulates kinematic patterns during competitive vs. cooperative interaction in Parkinson's disease

      2016, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      As postulated by some, engagement in social interaction and rewards processing require basal ganglia (BG) involvement (Izuma et al., 2008; Spreckelmeyer et al., 2009; Lebreton et al., 2009; Pfeiffer et al., 2014), and dopamine neurons play a central role in the reward circuit (Schultz, 2002; Wise, 2002). Behavioral and pharmacological studies on dopamine pathways have described associations between the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal pathways and reward and motor activity (Koob and Le Moal, 1997; Panksepp, 1998; Phillips et al., 1992; Shizgal, 1997; Wise, 2004). Much of the causal evidence supporting the hypothesis that the dopamine mediates the brain reward system is based on studies examining the pharmacological blockade of dopamine receptors in animals.

    • The neural substrates for the rewarding and dopamine-releasing effects of medial forebrain bundle stimulation have partially discrepant frequency responses

      2016, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, dopamine receptor antagonists block or reduce ICSS whereas indirect dopamine agonists, such as amphetamine and cocaine, potentiate ICSS [14,15]. However, behavioral studies also implicate neurons with highly excitable, myelinated axons in the rewarding effect of MFB stimulation [16–20,6], and electrophysiological studies have identified non-dopaminergic neurons, directly driven by MFB stimulation, that have characteristics consistent with those inferred from the behavioral studies [21–23]. Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) confirms that midbrain dopamine neurons are activated trans-synaptically by rewarding MFB stimulation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text