Trends in Cognitive Sciences
UpdateMultiple-trace theory and semantic dementia: Response to K.S. Graham (1999)
Section snippets
The multiple-trace theory
According to our theory, during consolidation the neural elements in neocortex and elsewhere mediating a particular conscious experience are bound into a cohesive unit by the hippocampus and adjacent medial temporal lobe structures (the hippocampal complex). The resulting memory trace or engram consists of a cohesive medial temporal-neocortical ensemble. The medial temporal component, which may provide the spatial context of the experience, acts as a pointer or index to the neocortical elements
Graham’s critique of multiple-trace theory
In developing our model and formulating its predictions, we focused almost exclusively on the medial temporal lobes and neglected to consider what effects neocortical lesions would have on episodic autobiographical memory. The only exception was prompted by Graham and Hodges’ report2 of a ‘reverse’ temporal gradient in episodic memory in semantic dementia that appeared as we were writing our paper5. Because there was so little evidence about episodic memory loss in this disorder, we suggested
How deficient is episodic memory in semantic dementia?
Before we attempt to see if our model can account for the data from semantic dementia, we think it necessary to have a better appreciation of the nature of the deficit than is provided in the few published studies. The ‘reversed’ pattern that is meant to characterize semantic dementia resembles what is typically observed in controls when the test is not so easy that performance is at ceiling10. The reader may be satisfied on this point by trying to describe in detail a recent vacation and one
Multiple-trace theory and episodic memory in semantic dementia
What would our model predict about the effects of neocortical lesions on episodic memory? Graham states1 that we would predict that ‘neurologically normal subjects (if tested appropriately) should show better retrieval of older episodic memories compared to those of their more recent past’ and ‘that patients with semantic dementia should show a similar pattern of performance to control subjects on tests of autobiographical memory’, with the proviso that memory will be impaired overall. Although
Conclusion: the multiple-trace theory vindicated
Investigations of episodic memory loss in semantic dementia address the question of the role that neocortical semantic processes play in episodic memory. We have argued that the pattern of deficits observed is at least as consistent with the multiple-trace theory of memory as with the traditional consolidation model. Indeed, we believe the evidence favors our theory. Predictions based on the multiple-trace model can account for the fact that memories formed within the very recent past, that is
References (16)
Semantic dementia: a challenge to the multiple-trace theory of memory consolidation
Trends Cognit. Sci.
(1999)- et al.
A reversal of the temporal gradient for famous person knowledge in semantic dementia: implications for the neural organisation of long-term memory
Neuropsychologia
(1998) - et al.
Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(1997) - et al.
Hippocampal contributions to cortical plasticity
Neuropharmacology
(1998) - et al.
Consolidation and the hippocampal complex revisited: in defense of the multiple-trace model – Discussion point
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(1998) Visual object agnosia, prosopagnosia, achromatopsia, loss of visual imagery, and autobiographical amnesia following recovery from cortical blindness: case M.H.
Neuropsychologia
(1993)- et al.
Reports of mental imagery in retrieval from long-term memory
Conscious. Cogn.
(1996) - et al.
Levels of processing: a framework for memory research
J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav.
(1972)
Cited by (53)
Patterns of autobiographical memory impairment according to disease severity in semantic dementia
2009, CortexCitation Excerpt :The reminiscence bump is observed in elderly subjects and corresponds to the surge of episodic memories involving vivid and important memories from adolescence and young adulthood, which are more easily accessible (Conway and Rubin, 1993; Rubin and Schulkind, 1997; Piolino et al., 2006). According to some authors (Moscovitch and Nadel, 1999; Nadel et al., 2000; Westmacott et al., 2001), evidence of such remote memories would be sufficient to prove that remote episodic memory is relatively preserved in mild SD, though limited by restricted verbal skills and a deficit of access as demonstrated by their poor spontaneity score. In fact, studies which tried to compensate the patients' retrieval deficits owing to semantic deficits or executive dysfunction yielded preserved autobiographical memories whatever the time period (Westmacott et al., 2001; Moss et al., 2000, 2003; McKinnon et al., 2006; Piolino et al., 2003b).
Chapter 1.1 Perspectives on episodic and semantic memory retrieval
2008, Handbook of Behavioral NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :On the Autobiographical Memory Interview (AMI; Kopelman et al., 1990), semantic dementia patients retrieve memories from recent time periods significantly better than memories from childhood and early adulthood (Snowden et al., 1996; Graham and Hodges, 1997; Hodges and Graham, 1998). One proposed explanation of this finding is that semantic knowledge is a critical component of episodic memory that provides common information about an event (Moscovitch and Nadel, 1999). Impairments in semantic memory like those seen in semantic dementia will thus impair retrieval of event memories, particularly remote memories for which some loss of spatial-temporal detail has occurred over time (Moscovitch et al., 2006).